It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Your conclusion contains absolutely no evidence and data - like I provided and continue to provide.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Indigo5
Maine is so full of hippies and retirees occupying double-wides that any mention of cutting the dole brings outrage aplenty.
Originally posted by sageofmonticello
If you can provide a verifiable list of state representation and the criteria of the state by state federal spending from the same year than we would have something to talk about.
edit on 20-1-2012 by sageofmonticello because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Indigo5
Really? That's all you've pulled from my post?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
You love that people are on welfare. You love that we have guns to our head extorting our wages. You love that nothing will ever be right, fixed or even honest.
Originally posted by METACOMET
There is an obvious correlation between states receiving federal dollars also having the largest military bases.
North Dakota, for example, is home to .2% of the US population, yet ND has some of the largest and most expensive military bases in the world, Not to mention our minuteman 3 nuclear ICBM installations.
On the other side, we have Massachusetts, which has virtually no military installations.
Since the federal government is spending $700 billion in its defense budget, states with large military installations are going to be receiving tens or hundreds of billions more than states that dont...edit on 20-1-2012 by METACOMET because: sp
That would fall under Defense Spending, not federal outlays to states.
Originally posted by METACOMET
Originally posted by Indigo5
That would fall under Defense Spending, not federal outlays to states.
Show me that this is the case. Reading through your link, I see no distinction between "federal spending" and "defense spending"edit on 20-1-2012 by METACOMET because: fx
Originally posted by sageofmonticello
that this does not take into consideration the population
Originally posted by METACOMET
There is an obvious correlation between states receiving federal dollars also having the largest military bases.
North Dakota, for example, is home to .2% of the US population, yet ND has some of the largest and most expensive military bases in the world, Not to mention our minuteman 3 nuclear ICBM installations.
On the other side, we have Massachusetts, which has virtually no military installations.
Since the federal government is spending $700 billion in its defense budget, states with large military installations are going to be receiving tens or hundreds of billions more than states that dont...edit on 20-1-2012 by METACOMET because: sp
Originally posted by The Old American
So the most populous states get more money. I get it! You're trying to teach us that mathematics works!