It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by FlyersFan
Wrong. The Catholic church was against people reading 'scripture' that was not accepted by the church. That's totally different than saying the Catholic church was against 'the reading of scriptures'. Oh .. btw ... not many people could read back in the day either ..
Wrong? Wrong.
The council of Trent in 1565 stated All the faithful Catholics must agree I shall never accept or interpret scripture otherwise in accordance with the unanimous concept of the fathers. “ the office of interpreting scripture is totally entrusted to the teaching Majesterium of the church. There are only 8 passages Rome claims they can interpret that no one else can.
In a similar manner the Pharisee’s claimed they alone had the right to interpret and enforce scripture, and that is when everything went wrong. Trouble followed when the right to read and study were in the hands of the few, instead of the many. When Jesus rebuked the Pharisee’s it wasn’t because they didn’t understand tradition, but because they didn’t understand the word of God.
www.letusreason.org...
For centuries it was a mortal sin to possess and read the Bible in one’s own native tongue. But the Bible read was the Latin Vulgate which virtually no one but trained priests could understand! Pope Innocent the 3rd 1200 A.D. Forbade Bible reading in the common language so people had to learn Latin before they could even pick up the book. The council of Valencia (1229), the Council of Trent (1545) and Pope Clement XI (1713) Issued a papal bull to forbid letting people have the Bible in their own language and reading it for themselves. Likewise Clement the 11th 1720 issued a Papal Bull against Bible reading. Leo the 12th 1821-1829 Condemned all religious freedom, Bible societies, and Bible translations.
Even the Catholic dictionary records this fact “In early times the Bible was read freely by the lay people...New dangers came in during the Middle Ages...To meet those evils, the Council of Toulouse (1229) and Terragona (1234) forbade the laity to read the vernacular translations of the Bible. Pius IV required bishops to refuse lay persons leave to read even Catholic versions of Scripture unless their confessors or parish priests judged that such reading was likely to prove beneficial.” (Catholic Dictionary, p. 82).edit on 21-1-2012 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by Greatest I am
What does bleated mean?
If it means attacked... nothing new.
In any case.... bring the noise
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Because it suggests a Creator and they cannot accept this. Why does religion have trouble with science? They don't. They have a problem with the man in the relationship refusing to admit he is wrong.
]
I do not agree.
Science and those who follow it over religions will never mind admitting they are wrong when those who believe in fantasy, miracles, magic and a super God prove they are right.
Science also rejects whole heartedly a genocidal son murdering God.
You not only have to prove your God is real but also that it is right for man to follow an alien God who is without morals.
Regards
DL
you realize that there is little to no proof of any historical "exodus" ....
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
reply to post by Akragon
you realize that there is little to no proof of any historical "exodus" ....
Are you sure about that?
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Originally posted by Greatest I am
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Because it suggests a Creator and they cannot accept this. Why does religion have trouble with science? They don't. They have a problem with the man in the relationship refusing to admit he is wrong.
]
I do not agree.
Science and those who follow it over religions will never mind admitting they are wrong when those who believe in fantasy, miracles, magic and a super God prove they are right.
Science also rejects whole heartedly a genocidal son murdering God.
You not only have to prove your God is real but also that it is right for man to follow an alien God who is without morals.
Regards
DL
If you have the perspective of the overall story, you can begin to see our place. All of what you state above can be seen by reading my articles. Start with my most recent. Careful study through the information will allow you to tie it in with what is happening in our world today. We are in Egypt and in bondage. First, they will take our money with an oppressive tax. Next, they will take our property. In most cases, they already have. The last step is slavery. We are nearly there. Compare this to Joseph being sold into slavery. This is the picture of Israel. Then follow this to the fact that the brothers didn't recognize him when they returned to Egypt for help. Follow the story from there and you see our world today. We are gearing up for the exodus in the wilderness.
[[/url]
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by Greatest I am
Interesting! I bookmarked your link for later perusal.
(And btw thanks for the acknowledgment earlier)
Can you tell us a little background about your personal theological journey?
Strange that you would read literally and historically what the Jews, the authors of the O T, do not.
They have more real authority than you so you might want to rethink.
www.raceandhistory.com...
It would be foolish to not recognize that it is myth we are dealing with here.
Do not be so mentally lazy.
Regards
DL
How much B S are you willing to eat from your Church hierarchy to maintain the delusion that you believe in an invisible miracle working absentee super God?
Gnostics believe in the God within and apotheosis without a church hierarchy to lead us to God.
What is the truth of God? Nothing that I ever read and having suffered apotheosis, I know that there is no one truth of God. No proof of course.
All revealed religions tend to say that God is unknowable.
They then proceed to write volumes of what they know of the unknowable.
Hmm. Sounds like someone is lying.
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
reply to post by Greatest I am
I see this exact post here:
www.theforumsite.com...
So either you claim to be GreatestIam2 ( user name there) or you plagiarized.
Copy cat or maybe you just think your opus magnum needs to be discovered by the masses.
Gee, how did I figure that one out? Just call it a little pursuit of knowledge, actually google.
My faith belongs to me and who are you to judge me when you don't know me? Why should I have to defend statements that other people make, in this case Martin Luther, if it's not what I believe?
I do not feel obliged to defend my faith to every Tom, Dick and Harry that wants to bash it. Maybe others do, but I'll take a pass.
Thanks anyway. GreatasIam/GreatasIam2. In other words, this little Christian isn't going waste her time on yet another bash the Christians thread.
Why don't you start a thread about why being a gnostic christian is the greatest thing since cherry pie?
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
I encourage you to truly study Christ and the Bible. See if you can find fault with him, and when you can't, let Him into your heart. Let us not lean on our own understanding but on the understanding of truth in God as we know Him through our one and only true example, Jesus the Christ of God.
edit on 23-1-2012 by HeFrippedMeOff because: typo
Let's do that if you like.
Jesus said, let no man put asunder. IOW, there is no divorce.
Would you tell some wife who gets beat twice a week that she cannot divorce her husband?
Was Jesus offering a fair and workable policy?
Regards
DL
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
reply to post by Greatest I am
I would never consider myself a great mind. I am very thankful for a simple mind with faith and a heart that loves. The title of your post is inflammatory and judgmental. I have no desire to discuss Christianity with you because of your mindset.
Regards,
Annedit on 1/23/2012 by sad_eyed_lady because: (no reason given)