Democrats Are the Ones Pushing Web Censorship, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 11:03 AM by SurrealisticPillow
reply to post by SaturnFX


I do digital artwork, and I have had pics stolen from websites. I look at is as promotion.
A lady out of Virginia snagged a pic and used it for a label. I guess someone told her the risk, or she felt guilty, but she contacted me to let me know and apologize. Long story short, she sent me a little bit of product and she can now use the art in good conscience. I would probably have never known otherwise.
Piracy is wrong, but the cure can be worse than the illness, and this legislation is. I suspect that far more is at play than piracy, as the web has overtaken the MSM as a source of real news and information, as well as merchandise of all sorts. Advertisers have to hate the web.


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 08:35 AM by SurrealisticPillow
reply to post by thisguyrighthere




The death of these bog box stores and big labels and big everthing might mean we have to pay a little more for our products but it should also mean the products we get should be of a better quality since there isnt enough room to waste dollars and time on a gamble.


These record labels have been screwing the artists for years. Lynyrd Skynyrd even made a song about it, "working for the MCA", I think was the name. Times are changing and they need to provide a real service or go out of business like everybody else, not try to buy Congress.


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 01:33 PM by ofhumandescent
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow



No it's the Congress that claims / labels themselves "democrat" but are southern "Democrats" that are really republicans.

Ombama has his ankles tied with a congress that wears Democratic hats but in actuality are repubicans that vote for the interest of the 1%.

Blast away...............I'm going to ignore ALL INSULTS from the pod people.
edit on 21-1-2012 by ofhumandescent because: spelling



reply posted on 24-1-2012 @ 10:54 AM by booyah23
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow



after reading some of the replys on this matter, no one cares about protecting your published work on the internet, its seems that people don't want facts on who is trying censor or steal your work, music, flims, science research, its the small print in this bill, like the health care bill, it had small print stating the IRS can look at your returns if you did'nt own or buy health insurance, and assess a fine on your tax return, and the jobs bill, it had small print stating big loop hole on suing business owners that refused to hire you because of NO work record, and that would cause more peolple to lose there business, like in the sixies when landlords lost there propertys, because of non rentals to blacks, look at those large empty lots, run down homes, that was your DEMOCRATS in the sixies, Judges protecting thugs in court, Dem judges, Pres. Obama has lost 20 members of congress to retirement because of fail policys, its insider info that sent them running, BUT no one asks WHERE ARE THE JOBS
edit on 24-1-2012 by booyah23 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-1-2012 @ 11:13 AM by booyah23
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow



Its because you did not, state that your work is not open source, plus you may have not ask for credit for work, some sites of old did just that they posted on their sites you must ask in writing via e-mail, to use any part of the story or art work, open source means no copy right portection, your work is protected when you post because of a time stamp, it stamp on everything you publish, on the web, like my replys to your post, anything in writing has a time stamp, every phone call, pictures sent on your cell phone, e-mails, if you have yahoo e-mail look at any e-mail at the bottom, click full headers and see it for your self, the time it was sent, the time the mail server receive it, on sent it along to you. and the spamers real e-mail addresses, not the ones on the reply area, use a watermark on your work,


reply posted on 24-1-2012 @ 02:54 PM by SurrealisticPillow
reply to post by booyah23


Yeah, I use a watermark now. I wasn't too concerned at the time because I had very little traffic. In this case, I got a case of honey out of the deal, so all is good.

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 3 days ago with 34 member flags
Bill C-38 protest has 13,000 websites going dark
  Posted 0 days ago with 16 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 4 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 14 days ago with 3 member flags