Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by Illustronic
Exactly what is your point?
My point is that when you posted:
Powered landings is the ultimate #1 reason the Russians didn't send men to the moon after Apollo, they barely got a robot to land safely
without crashing
it looked like the Russians (or, more correctly, the Soviet Union) had only landed safely one robot, when in fact they landed
seven, some of those, I think, with powered landings.
That's all.
Is it that hard to understand?
I think the term being sought is "rover."
Soft Landings (as opposed to impacts) and rovers:
Russian soft landings
Moon: Seven landings (but Luna 23, almost)
Luna 9, 13, 16, 17, 20, 21, 24
Venus (Venus loves Russians) -
Ten landings (Venera and Vega)
Venera 7 (sort of-- it fell over), 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
Vega 1, 2 (Vega 1 landed, but instruments on board failed prior to landing)
Mars (hates Russians)
zip.
Successful Rovers:
Lunokhod 1 (Moon, Russian)
Lunokhod 2 (Moon, Russian)
Sojourner (Mars, USA)
Spirit (Mars, USA)
Opportunity (Mars, USA)
So far, so good... Curiosity (en route to Mars, USA)