Russian Scientists Mock U.S. Radar Theory on Mars Probe, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 19-1-2012 @ 06:17 PM by SLAYER69
Well...


So much for WW-III. I know many here will either dismiss this report and some will feel vindicated over this announcement. Either way, I thought it was worth posting


Take it for what it's worth.

Russian Scientists Mock U.S. Radar Theory on Mars Probe

The theory that Russia’s Mars mission failed due to emissions from a U.S. radar is extremely “exotic,” Russian scientists said on Tuesday.

Phobos-Grunt, Russia's most ambitious planetary mission in decades, was launched on November 9 but it was lost due to a propulsion failure and fell back to Earth on Sunday. Soon after the failed launch, the Russian space agency Roscosmos said a rocket motor should have started up to push the probe into higher orbit, but it failed to fire for unknown reasons.

The crash could have been caused by a powerful electromagnetic emission from a U.S. radar in the Pacific Ocean, which could have interfered with the probe's electronics, Kommersant daily reported earlier on Tuesday citing an unnamed source in the Russian space industry. The source stressed that it was more likely an accident rather than an act of sabotage.



reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 06:39 PM by DrumsRfun
reply to post by SLAYER69



Phobos-Grunt, Russia's most ambitious planetary mission in decades, was launched on November 9 but it was lost due to a propulsion failure and fell back to Earth on Sunday. Soon after the failed launch, the Russian space agency Roscosmos said a rocket motor should have started up to push the probe into higher orbit, but it failed to fire for unknown reasons.


Looks like human failure that is given the denial treatment.

The source stressed that it was more likely an accident rather than an act of sabotage.


Yup...looks like it.

He suggested the theory was just a blind to cover up some people’s mistakes.


Yup...sure looks like it.

According to NASA, Russia has failed in all 17 of its attempts to study the Red Planet close-up since 1960. The most recent failure before November 2011 occurred in 1996, when Russia lost its Mars-96 orbiter during launch.


I will not rule this out though...
Consider the power of the impact. I don’t think the Americans have radars capable of ensuring such power at such an altitude [about 200 kilometers],” said Alexander Zakharov of the Russian Academy of Sciences Space Research Institute, where the Phobos equipment and research program were developed.


My source...www.abovetopsecret.com...






reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 06:56 PM by tvtexan
reply to post by SLAYER69


The ruskies might mock our "Radar", but everyone knows that OUR Radar kicks butt!
This guy could single handedly take down an entire country, or get you 200lbs of bacon!
GO IOWA!


For the younger folks here... google MASH
edit on 19-1-2012 by tvtexan because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 07:16 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by DrumsRfun



Here is one from a while back before the latest run on the story


Russia says foreign power may have caused spy satellite loss
From: Moscow (AFP) Feb 14, 2011

The Russian space agency suggested Monday that a foreign power may have been behind the space accident that disabled one of the country's most modern military satellites earlier this month.

Russia on February 1 launched a high-tech Geo-IK-2 craft to help the military draw a three-dimensional map of the Earth and locate the precise positions of various targets.

News reports said the satellite was a vital part of Russia's effort to match the United States and NATO's ability to target its missiles from space.

But the craft briefly went missing after its launch only to re-emerge in a wrong orbit that left the craft unable to complete its assigned task.



reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 08:07 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by michael1983l





I appreciate the feed back and details.
That's one in the vindication column.


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 10:15 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by Cosmic911



Would you mind elaborating on what you mean please?

Sounds interesting.


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 03:41 AM by Cosmic911
reply to post by SLAYER69



It may be difficult to articulate this post for me because I do not understand a great deal about radar but I meant that if some of our most sophisticated space-faring equipment can be devasted by things like radar unintentionally (or intentionally :puz, or other devices and what not, then we still have a long way to go to understanding these principles before space exploration really becomes routine and safe.

Does that make sense? I know I this thought isn't completely organized yet but I'm still contemplating it.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 17 days ago with 87 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 11 days ago with 79 member flags
Proof ATS is being watched!
  Posted 1 days ago with 67 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 13 days ago with 59 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 18 days ago with 57 member flags