NASA Debunks Stereo-B Triangular UFO

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 06:02 PM
link   
I wouldnt trust anything NASA says they are the main ones putting all of the disinformation out there. They know aliens exsist but they choose not to telll the masses. By the way hello everyone im new to this site so any help would be appreciated.




posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by hotbread
NASA Scientists have finally debunked claims made here and elsewhere about a triangular pyramid shaped object that was seen a few weeks ago on the Stereo-B, and discussed in this thread:


Seriously? You use NASA to debunk an anti NASA conspiracy?





edit on 19-1-2012 by zorgon because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 
Why don't you come up with a better explanation




posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZeroUnlmtd
reply to post by miniatus
 


no doubt, but even here everyone is a self taught genius on debunkery so i'm still unconvinced


Logic and scientific reasoning is pretty basic, it doesn't require even a GED to subscribe to logic reasoning ..expecting evidence for a claim is a basic .. exclaiming something is evidence when there are valid alternate reaons .. seems also basic .. it's not rocket science, to me.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 11:52 PM
link   
NASA has as much credibility as Sorcha Faal, or less, I would give them less, because some of what Sorcha Faal says has a grain of truth in it.

Just because the liars speak doesn't make it so.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 11:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by hotbread
reply to post by zorgon
 
Why don't you come up with a better explanation



Well on the threads there were probably some good ideas, including TRIANGLE UFO.



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 02:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by hotbread
Why don't you come up with a better explanation


Okay...







posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 09:12 AM
link   
wow it's amazing how people get the "information" about the "ufo" they see. hahah people have an extreamly weird imagenation



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 09:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Slavich
reply to post by hotbread
 


Just goes to show you that all conspiracy nuts pull their crap out of thin air with no actual backing.


So by what you just said, "all conspiracy nuts", doesn't that also include you? If so, why are you even on this website?

It is you that has pulled that conclusion out of thin air.



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Slavich

Originally posted by Bob Down Under
Well if it was not Venus then it would have to be either swamp gas or ballons wouldnt it


Yea lets refute scientific claims backed by science.


Yes lets, because we all know how primitive 'our' science is these days...

Prove this... prove that.... whatever happened to intuition? And knowing you were right/wrong about something.

PSSHHH.



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Where is the video that shows the lens flare? I was expecting the high resolution footage to show the actual flare.


If you want to debunk the triangle, post the video!!



posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by miniatus
I would probably make more than I make as a lowly software developer =)


And you get to blow things up, drop bombs on the moon and comets and smash expensive space craft into heavenly bodies




posted on Jan, 20 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sleepingdeath
wow it's amazing how people get the "information" about the "ufo" they see. hahah people have an extreamly weird imagenation


"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein



posted on Jan, 22 2012 @ 05:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist

Originally posted by Bob Down Under
Well if it was not Venus then it would have to be either swamp gas or ballons wouldnt it



Dear Bob Down Under,

Please give it a rest.





    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    Nah!! Andre It was high flying swamp gas, you should no that ?



    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    Now its time to sit back and wait as it will not be long before the lens flare, lantern, ball lightening and the old swamp gas pops its head up.



    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    The Military would call this SWAMP GAS
    or should I say a weather balloon?.



    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    Have a good look through these photos as there are plenty of what you are calling trash can lids?
    Better than swamp gas I suppose.



    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    Well thats the norm these days but its a bit more modern than shouting swamp gas! balloon! chinese lantern! venus!



    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    Its the new and fashionable skeptic tool, the old swamp gas and weather balloon has had its days.



    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    Well it makes a change from the old weather ballons and swamp gas routine.



    Originally posted by Bob Down Under
    Yep!!! I am with you but dont forget the old swamp gas and balloons? Lol



    I hate skeptics!




[/quote


My HERO!!

You have wasted quite a few minutes of your egotistic little life tracing my related jokeing/ tongue in cheek comments regarding swamp gas etc. so now you have stars for that smart arse post and no doubt now struting around like some poseing rooster.
I rarely answer to smug posts like this but nerds like you need a good smack in the face and get a life and may be some sence of humour





top topics
 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join