Jan.19 CNN/Southern Republican Debate Discussion Thread 8 pm ET, page 40


Pages: <<  37    38    39    40    41  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 02:00 AM by mcdgray129
Originally posted by mcsandy
reply to
post by mcdgray129



If I had access I would funnel an absentee ballot to you mate. You have a better understanding than many citizens of the US.

Mickey Mouse signed one for the primaries......and where is Obama now.....in Disney, thanking him for his vote.

Thanks star for you hahaha. And Ron Pauls message touches so many people, thats why so many people even outside of America likes him .


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 05:30 AM by vkturbo
reply to post by TupacShakur



Obama might do slightly better but who cares how much coverage has RP had compared to the likes of the rest if RP is only a few points behind that isn't bad in my eyes when he has has has a very small percentage of news feed


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 05:35 AM by BO XIAN
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady



I thought Perry bowed out and is supporting Newt???

I'm a little curious . . . how many on this thread, see Newt as I do . . .

a dyed-in-the-wool globalist RINO???

And . . . Ron Paul as a . . . globalist wild card???


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 08:43 AM by Praetorius
reply to post by colbe

It's God's teaching forever. He decides life and death not us, He created you and and He decides when He will take you home, the littlest, most innocent home to Him too.

So why are you using - with all due respect - a failed and imcomplete understanding of this one issue to shoulder aside a candidate who defends indisputable life, for those who advocate war, sanctions that kill, and all sorts of limits on liberty otherwise? Rick Santorum is a fear-driven warmonger, and the rest fall not far behind him - you speak of pro-life, but operate in the most backwards understanding of it.

A miscarriage is God's action. Contraception is a selfish act for pleasure. Sex is for marriage and procreation, both.

I have to disagree - if you're going to attribute a miscarriage to God's direct action (which doesn't even apply to lack of fetal implantation in the uterus, two very different things), then you have to say that every chance thing is his direct action, which I have to argue. Yes, god designed these processes, but they are natural processes and I do not believe that he personally crafts every one specifically - otherwise he is equally responsible for every cast of the dice, every spin of the wheel and every other chance thing that happens in the world - has quite a lot of atrocities to answer for directly, as that also makes him directly responsible for tubal and ectopic pregnancies, children being born without brains, all the deformed children being born in Iraq and other places (which I would much rather attribute to the chemical effects of DU ammunition used in the area, or something else we've introduced directly to cause the rise of such), and everything else.

Yes, he's the ultimate author of life and its processes, but I do not believe he actively crafts every single things that happens in our reality. There is also will, and there is also chance - despite the Psalm's lovely poetry.

You repeat the same thing not understanding what it is...a "fertilized egg." Life begins at conception.

Agreed - the process of life, that ends in a human. Conception, however, does not equal a human nor a soul. You can continue to insist on your belief and faith for saying such, but that is the only thing you'll have supporting such a claim.

You do "see" though, a change of "morality", yes, the times, accepting grave sin as not being a sin at all now!

Like accepting fear-driven warmakers over the sons of god trying to make peace?

What are you talking about friend, "no evidence?" Have you ever seen a ultrasound and the modern fetal photography the time lapsed? It's been divinely revealed, at the moment of fertilization, there is a new human person with a body and a soul. "I knew you before you were born" and
"I knit you in your mother's womb" such loving verses from Scripture.

Yes. I've seen ultrasounds and I'm very well familiar with fetal development - meaning I also know that a morning-after pill used with 48 hours of fertilization that we have no way if knowing has even occurred and has a very good chance of not naturally implanting anyway affects in no way, shape, or form anything resembling a human body or soul.

For clarity, here's what we're looking at at THREE WEEKS from fertilization:
Week 3
Gestational age: 2 (whole) weeks old. 15–21 days from last menstruation.
Embryonic age: Week nr 1. 0 (whole) weeks old. 1–7 days from fertilization.
1) Fertilization of the ovum to form a new human organism, the human zygote. (day 1 of fert.)
2) The zygote undergoes mitotic cellular divisions, but does not increase in size. This mitosis is also known as cleavage. A hollow cavity forms marking the blastocyst stage. (day 1.5–3 of fert.)
3) The blastocyst contains only a thin rim of trophoblast cells and a clump of cells at one end known as the "embryonic pole" which include embryonic stem cells.
4) The embryo hatches from its protein shell (zona pellucida) and performs implantation onto the endometrial lining of the mother's uterus. (day 5–6 of fert.)
5) If separation into identical twins occurs, 1/3 of the time it will happen before day 5.[7]

We have...cellular division. What we're talking about here, abortionist propaganda about later stages aside, is literally an actual clump of cells, at most. No formation, no differentiation, nothing. And very much likely to pass without implantation, all on its own.

And you refer to fetal photography - but we're not even at the fetal stage until about week 10. We're in completely different worlds here.

con't....


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 08:50 AM by Praetorius
reply to post by Praetorius

continued response to colbe....

Contraceptioncauses an abortion of a fertilized egg! You reject this
because most of the world today want to deny life and take the pleasure of the act.

I haven't rejected it, actually, aside from arguing the proper use of the term abortion - I've just confirmed that this doesn't have much of anything to do with a human body or soul, given the development involved and the natural odds of the exact same thing happening anyway.

I could care less about denying life or taking pleasure in the act, I'm not philosophizing, I'm merely discussing the realities of fertilization, contraception, and development themselves...and pointing out how silly it is to compare contraception to abortion, in addition to supporting war candidates over peace candidates based on such.

Are you a man, may I ask? You don't have to say. People like anonymity.

This isn't opinion, it's a revealed Truth for 2000 years Remember our discussion when the Great Warning takes place.

Yes, colbe, I'm a man, I don't mind answering. But I would also prefer you not take that information to make some baseless assumption as to my motivations. I am also a child of god and a firm believer, and I used to share your opinion until I put a lot of thought, study, and prayer into it, as well as consideration of a good many other things I had previously accepted in this life.

I will definitely remember this discussion - but I do not find myself falling back to return to your belief here. You can say it isn't opinion, but you are casting your own interpretation on the scriptures, and specifically have only mentioned one which was likely David crying out to god - not god revealing any truth to David.

You're definitely welcome for the discussion - I'm sorry we can't agree on it but I mean no offense to you or your beliefs with it...just reasoned disagreement.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 08:53 AM by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to
post by ugie1028



I thought Santorum would be the next to fall also, but now that the news came out today that he won Iowa, how do you think that will affect the primary?




Gingrich and Santorums Days are Numbered , It will Only be Romney and Paul Next in Virginia , the other two will become Old News Soon.......


Newt will win the primary in South Carolina.

The race is wide open now.

Rick Santorum won Iowa.
Mitt Romney won New Hampshire.
Newt won South Carolina.

Time to move on to Florida.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 08:56 AM by Eurisko2012
reply to post by Praetorius



The number 1 issue for South Carolina is the economy. 9.9% unemployment is
unacceptable. The Boeing / NLRB mess has everyone running away from
Obama - The Food Stamp President.



reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 05:05 PM by macaronicaesar
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to
post by eLPresidente



I hope you aren't claiming those are lies.

One is just plain fact...he did use his left over campaign funds to create the Ron Paul Campaign For Liberty Convention.

And the other is my opinion...opinions can't be lies...sorry.


Try again.


Opinions stated as absolutes are, in fact, lies, that's without considering how off that opinion is.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 06:04 PM by sageofmonticello
reply to post by Grimpachi



What do you think is going to happen if we leave Korea?

What I think. Absolutely nothing. It may have been necessary during the cold war but that has been over for more than 20 years.

But lets say I am wrong and something does happen. I am pretty sure congress could declare war and go back there pretty quickly.

As far as the insults... supporters of all the candidates throw around and play the insult game. I don't like it either but are you really saying that only the RP crowd does it? gimme a break. Supporters of all the candidates do that and it is ugly no matter who they back.

Personally I see RP supporters getting insulted much more than they insult.


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 06:13 PM by sageofmonticello
reply to post by Byrd



When did you check the numbers?

I have checked the numbers and RP has $95,000 donated to him from the military with Obama having $72,000 donated to him from the military.

If you have different information I would love to see the link.

www.examiner.com...

hotair.com...


reply posted on 20-1-2012 @ 06:28 PM by sageofmonticello
reply to post by Grimpachi



Ron Paul just made a point that we should bring our troops home and put them on our borders which is unconstitutional. Somebody should call him out on that.


That is incorrect, Ron Paul said we should use those resources to protect our border, not use the troops. Resources.

Resources means money. Sorry not picking on you just found two different posts you made that I had something to say about.
Pages: <<  37    38    39    40    41  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags