Jan.19 CNN/Southern Republican Debate Discussion Thread 8 pm ET, page 22


Pages: <<  19    20    21    22    23    24    25  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 08:36 PM by Grimpachi
Originally posted by squidboy
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Grimpachi
When Ron Paul says things like need to get out of South Korea that's where he loses me as a veteran and having served their I know the importance of why we need to be there and so should he.


So you disagree with your brothers in uniform?
He gets the most active duty donations than everyone else combined


No I dissagree with Ron Paul. I don't care where his money comes from. That should not be the point.


Rather have money donated to a candidate from Vets then corporations and banks. And I believe campaign donations speak highly of the man. Most vets are sick of war (obviously I'm guessing , those that are not stationed in SK).

Really though, We need to be there? Why?

To maintain peace?

What happens when our economy collapses because we overstretched ourselves protecting other nations? What happens then, peace wise?

Either we get out now and try to maintain our own boarders or we continue to overstretch our military arms/ eventually financially self destructing because of it. Either way, we will eventually leave. I'd rather have our own nation remain stability.

I'm not singling you out, I just don't get why people think we can continue to play world police, without compromising our own national security. It's not our job to play world police. We do not need bases in almost every country on earth....

We can't afford it anyways. If things don't change, it's going to get worse here at home.



If we leave South Korea North Korea will attack and they will win unless we go back to war. We have promised to defend South Korea pulling out is not a option. When I was there there were at least three times that North Korea threatened war. The DMZ is a cease-fire scenario technically they are still at war. Still like your cheap cars and electronics and that is only possible because we have troops there. That is only part of the reason but it is enough of a reason.

The idea that I should vote for Ron Paul because other people in the military vote for Ron Paul is antiAmerican. I served my country but I did not give up my right to have my own opinion. The opposite should be true. I have my own idea of why Ron Paul is popular with military. He is not as popular with veterans.

Ron Paul just made a point that we should bring our troops home and put them on our borders which is unconstitutional. Somebody should call him out on that.


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 08:39 PM by Corruptedstructure
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Originally posted by squidboy
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Grimpachi
When Ron Paul says things like need to get out of South Korea that's where he loses me as a veteran and having served their I know the importance of why we need to be there and so should he.


So you disagree with your brothers in uniform?
He gets the most active duty donations than everyone else combined


No I dissagree with Ron Paul. I don't care where his money comes from. That should not be the point.


Rather have money donated to a candidate from Vets then corporations and banks. And I believe campaign donations speak highly of the man. Most vets are sick of war (obviously I'm guessing , those that are not stationed in SK).

Really though, We need to be there? Why?

To maintain peace?

What happens when our economy collapses because we overstretched ourselves protecting other nations? What happens then, peace wise?

Either we get out now and try to maintain our own boarders or we continue to overstretch our military arms/ eventually financially self destructing because of it. Either way, we will eventually leave. I'd rather have our own nation remain stability.

I'm not singling you out, I just don't get why people think we can continue to play world police, without compromising our own national security. It's not our job to play world police. We do not need bases in almost every country on earth....

We can't afford it anyways. If things don't change, it's going to get worse here at home.



If we leave South Korea North Korea will attack and they will win unless we go back to war. We have promised to defend South Korea pulling out is not a option. When I was there there were at least three times that North Korea threatened war. The DMZ is a cease-fire scenario technically they are still at war. Still like your cheap cars and electronics and that is only possible because we have troops there. That is only part of the reason but it is enough of a reason.

The idea that I should vote for Ron Paul because other people in the military vote for Ron Paul is antiAmerican. I served my country but I did not give up my right to have my own opinion. The opposite should be true. I have my own idea of why Ron Paul is popular with military. He is not as popular with veterans.

Ron Paul just made a point that we should bring our troops home and put them on our borders which is unconstitutional. Somebody should call him out on that.


He means with the National Guard


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 08:40 PM by SurrealisticPillow
reply to post by Grimpachi


I was going to stay out of this, but what the heck.
Why in the hell do you suppose it is YOUR duty to "protect" South Korea? Or OUR duty? How do you benefit besides getting a paycheck?
You are protecting the interests of BIG CORPORATIONS, not your own interests, or those of your family, unless you work for these corporations directly. And of course, those same corporations serve only themselves, not the interests of Americans in general.
South Korea can afford their OWN damn protection.


reply posted on 19-1-2012 @ 08:41 PM by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by MysticPearl



Did you hear the crowd's reaction to the question about his ex-wife???

Sure, the talking heads will talk about it...but it will never be a debate question again, it won't be an interview question without him giving the same exact answer, and none of the candidates will pick it up as an attack because of how the crowd reacted.

I thought the story was a big joke after they hyped it up so much and then it came out to just be more dirt about his marriages. So in my opinion...I don't think it was much of a story to begin with.
Pages: <<  19    20    21    22    23    24    25  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags