It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Appreciation definitely is a good vibe, but I'm not sure if appreciation and love can really be said to be the creator of the universe. How would that work?
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Life and the universe are one and the same if you ask me. A living being is just as much the universe as an inanimate rock. That is why I think the essence of life itself is what God is.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
I think God would be the most neutral singularity there can be. Everything is in God, so that includes good and evil.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Appreciation would be the way to a higher quality of life though.
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by thruthseek3r
Ok, I want feedback though. Why do you disagree?edit on 19-1-2012 by arpgme because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by restrain
Wouldn't this "creation" that we exist in be even more beautiful if it were self-creating? Wouldn't the total randomity of this universe be a vastly more magnificent concept, than that of a divine creator? (A creator, which, when invoked brings about an infinite regression, mind you)
So in short: yes, I disagree with your post. In the sense that, God is not needed to appreciate anything. In fact, in my honest opinion, without a divine creator, there is much, much more that we can come to appreciate.
Originally posted by restrain
Sir,
I have to ask this:
What do you define as God?
Originally posted by restrain
You say that God is "forming things from himself." Is this true for objects that destroy themselves, or that are complete failures?
Originally posted by restrain
what proof do you have?
Originally posted by restrain
Wouldn't this "creation" that we exist in be even more beautiful if it were self-creating?
Originally posted by restrain
Wouldn't the total randomity of this universe be a vastly more magnificent concept, than that of a divine creator?
Originally posted by restrain
yes, I disagree with your post. In the sense that, God is not needed to appreciate anything.
Originally posted by restrain
In fact, in my honest opinion, without a divine creator, there is much, much more that we can come to appreciate.
The concept of God reassures us in troubling times that all is well and all is orchestrated to a perfection that we are mostly unaware of. So when you fall away from appreciation, God is there to remind you that you have everything to be thankful for. The concept of divinity lets people know that existence is infinitely beautiful beyond comprehension. Even if there isn't a God, I would like to think there is.
You make it sound like it is either or. Even if a creator didn't exist, that doesn't mean that things are automatically random...
Originally posted by restrain
And if God is the simplicity creating the complexity, wouldn't the roles change? Wouldn't we be God to this "god?"
Originally posted by restrain
As for God being the universe, that's a claim. And your evidence for your claim is that since A is B, and B exists, A has to exist? Again I have to ask, what proof do you have to show that A is in fact B?
Originally posted by restrain
I'm not saying God does not exist with absolute certainty because that's ridiculous, it's simply that the evidence in favor of a God is seriously lacking.
Originally posted by restrain
And depending on what kind of deity (choose one from any of the multitude of religions) you believe in, the evidence could be lacking even more.
Originally posted by arpgme
Originally posted by restrain
And if God is the simplicity creating the complexity, wouldn't the roles change? Wouldn't we be God to this "god?"
You, everything is God, but when I refer to God I am speaking of the quantum universe- the bigger picture and everything is connected through quantum entanglement.
Originally posted by restrain
As for God being the universe, that's a claim. And your evidence for your claim is that since A is B, and B exists, A has to exist? Again I have to ask, what proof do you have to show that A is in fact B?
I'm not just saying that A = B, I'm saying:
A = B; B = A
So the fact that B exists means that A exists since they are the EXACT same thing just different names, or in this case letters...
Currency is money. We know that currency exists because money exist, and since money exist currency must exist.
I just like the term "God" better.
Originally posted by restrain
I'm not saying God does not exist with absolute certainty because that's ridiculous, it's simply that the evidence in favor of a God is seriously lacking.
See above ^
Originally posted by restrain
And depending on what kind of deity (choose one from any of the multitude of religions) you believe in, the evidence could be lacking even more.
A deity is a "supernatural being". The universe is completely natural.
I think if that was so, it would say something like that in the New Testament, so seeing it does not, I would take it that God did not create evil.
God is the sculpture of all that exists. He sculpts the evil and the good, just like the painter paints the beautiful outdoors and the wickedness of the mind.