Chemtrails are nanobots?

Just found this very interesting clip... a guy managed to find a way to actually see the chemtrail fallout which appear to happen during the night.. And they look like they fly around ! Not just fall down but also up and sideways sometime.

His own description:

Read first! This is not mist, snow, dust, bugs, or pollen. This is nano fallout from chemtrails that are being sprayed over your cities. Spraying was heavy at sunset. This is what is mixed in the air we breathe. Notice the patterns arent straight down or up. It varies. Theses particles are living nano bugs. Temp was 47° with low humidity.

Debunk please.

More "nanobots"...

Looks like snow blowing around.

Not to mention that any real "nano-bot" would be too small for the human eye to see.

reply to post by Chadwickus


Yeah who knows? he says it is not bugs, but it may just as well be pollen.

If they were true "nano" sized things, then they would be invisible.

It's most likely one of the things he claims it is not.

reply to post by NeoVain


note - all ridicule in this post is directed at the youtube idiot , noth the ATS thread starter

sigh - this is a clear example of idiots using words they do not understand in an attempt to lend credence and scientific legitimacy to thier idiocy

the most abused such phrases are nano- , quantum- , scalar- and dimensional-

these concepts do have genuine scientific meaning - but in the vast majority of conspiracy theories - they are simply shoe-horned in , to apply a pseudo scientific veneer - one step up from ` its magic ` or ` god did it `

Plus of course the YT poster fails to show that there is a connection between his "nanobots" and any trails in the first place.

the fact that 1 comes after the other doesn't actually mean that the first caused the 2nd, and is a common shortcoming in "chemtrail" "reasoning" - it is known as cum hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin for "with this, therefore because of this") and false cause....which jsut mean that correlation does not imply causation - the fact that things are co-related is not proof - or even evidence - that one caused the other.

Well I guess someone has to say this...

Sorry DEBUNKED......