Something that no one has commented on is the hurricane that lay offshore on 9/11 near New York City, Hurricane Erin. Even Wikipedia listed it as the
longest lasting hurricane of the 2001 season. Yet despite this, it was not reported on in the media.
Source and pic here
I feel I must bring this forward because Canadians watch the weather systems like hawks and the maritime provinces especially watch and report on
everything that can impact them. No surprise there, they are avid fishermen and pay very close attention to such things. However, it is a
characteristic of the US media to stop reporting on a hurricane event as soon as it leaves US waters, even though that same system can hit land and
kill people further north, cause injuries and devastate properties in the Canadian maritime provinces. Not meant as criticism, I'm just stating the
usual media procedure.
So even as I monitored the airwaves for inclement weather, there was nothing mentioned about it after it passed Bermuda, even though that sucker
headed up the coast and sat in wait outside New York for a few days, increasing in intensity from a category 1 to a category 3 with winds of 120 mph!
To me that is nothing short of astonishing. Suddenly it began to move, following an unusual path. It veered east, not a smooth turn, but a sharp
sudden turn of over 180 degrees. Then it corrected to the west a little to follow the north gulf stream passage.
Illustration of path here
For those of you who somehow might not know, there was a military project back in 1996 called ‘Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in
Source and pdf file here
To suppose that the military was unaware of Erin requires a serious rethink. It ias not even a debatable point. The US military most definitely knew
about it because it was one of their stated objectives to know about weather and to control it since years ago. Of course someone will come along and
point out with some accuracy that I don't know for certain that they altered the course of that hurricane, but there is nothing to say that they did
not try (and succeed, I might add.) C'mon, it was hushed in the media. I won't impose a you Tube video on you about it, but feel free to do a YT
search for them, as there are a few on the subject.
In 2006, CNN reported here
that China's weather
bureau was planning to stave off rain for the Olympics in 2008. And in its latest 5 year plan, China announced that it plans to increase rain by 10%
in the next four years. So it's quite obvious that there is some serious attention being paid to weather modification.
Tesla was a Russian whose discoveries over a hundred years ago were known to Russia. Think they haven't developed weather control stuff?
Now as for weaponry, did you know Senator Pell of Rhode Island was quoted in The Providence Journal Bulletin, 1975 as follows:
"The U.S. and other world powers should sign a treaty to outlaw tampering with weather as an instrument of war. It may seem far fetched to think of
using weather as a weapon but I'm convinced that the U.S. did, in fact, use rainmaking techniques as a weapon of war in Southeast Asia. We need a
treaty now to prevent such actions...before military leaders of the world start directing storms, manipulating climates and inducing earthquakes
against the enemies. The basic idea of environmental warfare is simple.....if a nation can learn to trigger natural events it can inflict terrible
damage on an enemy through rainfall, flooding, tidal waves, earthquakes and even climate changes that could devastate an enemy nation's
In the following year,1976, the United Nations Treaty against using weather modification weapons as warfare against other nations was signed on Dec
16th. That's right, nineteen seventy-six. The cover letter can quickly be viewed
here Click on first item.
Sorry, computer problems. Have to stop here for now.