It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking News: Newt Gingrich's campaign is about to implode

page: 15
59
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow
 

I'm not going to touch that if/until a more credible source comes forward.

edit on 19-1-2012 by Jason88 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:39 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:41 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:42 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow
 


That story sits next to: China's Savage War With Space Aliens

enough said.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jason88
I think there is some confusion here. First, it's never good to cheat on your spouse, but as world leaders prove again and again, power leads run away sexual desires.

The republicans have a real problem - family values. That's a real difference between them and democrats. They picked family values to appeal to conservative America. The democrats went after the minorities instead. The democrats never claimed family values as a platform, but since the republicans did, it has castrated the current crop of candidates (Romney, Paul exceptions - so far).

On the flip side, Obama never had a family values issue - he is surrounded by his wife and kids all the time.



It's not that Republicans "picked" family values. It's that Democrats embraced the radical feminist agenda and abortion and many Republicans remained pro-life. I remember when Dick Gephardt went pro-Choice. 3rd Disctrict St. Louis.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:47 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:50 PM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 


Is that really the way you look at poltics? Like it's a horse race?

See, I disagree with that sort of "I'll go with who has the most momentum - I wanna be the one to pick the winner" philosophy.

I look at it as a contest of merit. I want to vote for the one that I think has the most merit.

I don't care if I am the only person on the world that realizes the merit in my candidate. It's about my own integrity too.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


It would be if it was true. It was not. Click the link I provided. It was all right-wing slander (ala McCain's Negro baby).



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:56 PM
link   
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
 


Yes, embraced women's rights and women's choice. The republicans hedged their bets on pro-life, but found it has zero to do with a candidates electability, what they'll do in office (nothing), or really impact the voting base. This is a Christian ideal, that except for a minority in a loud echo chamber, don't really care about as an issue. That's a family problem, not a government one - as the republicans want it to be. See the double standard there.... republicans inserting government in the family process.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by hadriana
 


Its not how I personally choose to vote, but it's how most people tend to vote. Strategically. People tend to not pay much attention and tend to vote along party lines. In the US I haven't seen a republican I can vote for with a clear conscious for... Well forever. So I tend to vote Dem. Like I said earlier though, American democracy is corrupted by business, primarily, and as such needs to be fixed. Not replaced.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:01 PM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 

It has NOT been debunked, because you cannot debunk the testimony of others, often under oath. You cannot debunk the deaths of and imprisonment of the parties mentioned, they did die/get killed, and the people WERE imprisoned.
Until you face the fact that these people are criminal, you will never be able to understand their actions.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:09 PM
link   

ATTENTION!!!



This is the topic:

Breaking News: Newt Gingrich's campaign is about to implode



Not Obama and his past, Clinton, Reagan or any other President or their misdeeds.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:13 PM
link   
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow
 


It has been debunked. The information explaining it all away is littered all over the Internet. It was a political hit piece paid for by hard core right wingers and extreme Christian evangelical groups and distributed by Jerry Falwell. Fallwell himself has said he doesn't know if it's true. And he's the main source of the VHS copies. 

The director wasn't a journo but a Baptist minister. 

Here's all sorts of links:

www.snopes.com...

conwebwatch.tripod.com...

www.factcheck.org...


Put it like this, if the fact that the director of this crap shared a bank account with millions in it with the CEO of Newsmax doesn't make you think twice, nothing will.

The Clinton Chronicles is debunked political propaganda. Nothing more.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by WhiteDevil013
 





Obama has so many things that they've refused to report on and simply swept under the rug, leaving us conspiracy theorists to look stupid when we bring it up because no one knows about them.


Can't argue with you there,

Clinton was a philanderer, Kennedy and his brothers were philanderers, everyone seem to still like them.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jason88
reply to post by Indigo5
 


Thanks for that very clear and insightful post. It is like republicans adopted family values and have become just the opposite, and once they all out abandon family values to simply "win" they have already lost. As a christian, it saddens me that so much of this country is only told what they want to hear by sheep in wolves clothing.


As my preacher father always says "People like to get their ears tickled". They don't want to really live the life. Heck, I know atheists that live holier lives then these hogs with ears running for office these days.

We need to wait until the interview however as ABC is only giving out preview clips right now. There may be a lot more to it.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 

Truth is truth, it doesn't matter who brings it or why.
I have read the so-called "debunkers" material. They debunk nothing, they just try to show nefarious intentions on the part of the producers. I don't care about their intentions, I just take the side of truth.
Period.



posted on Jan, 19 2012 @ 02:31 PM
link   
ahahaha.

As if there was any hope for his campaign in the first place?

Its all a big fat publicity stunt.



new topics

top topics



 
59
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join