It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fox News Live Admits Ron Paul Leading by a Large Margin and Romney Sucks.

page: 1
11
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:23 AM
link   
Alright is this really Fox News? I need some fellow ATS members to validate this for me, I think I am dreaming.

This was a twitter poll, but I think this is a very good indication of how people are really feeling about their presidential candidate choices and who they believe in.

Romney is way way below average, as many are the other candidate on a wide array of topics.

This reporter is actually reporting the real time facts, and there responses are open and truthful, as well.

I wonder what is going to happen to these two reporters, maybe new jobs?

Take a look.


edit on 18-1-2012 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:29 AM
link   
Ron Paul came out on top on most of the issues, it is not surprising, but he is getting more and more recognition. He is the turtle in the race against the hares. He is slowly and systematically chipping away at the corrupted foundation one candidate at a time.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:31 AM
link   
"These polls are not scientific, they are people voting for their favorite candidate"


Implying any political polling is scientific.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:31 AM
link   
My god he nearly chocked having to say Ron Paul did the best over all, well done to the female caster for forcing the issue, she probably got sacked this morning lol

Great to see



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Ron Paul came out on top on most of the issues, it is not surprising, but he is getting more and more recognition. He is the turtle in the race against the hares. He is slowly and systematically chipping away at the corrupted foundation one candidate at a time.


Agreed, but I almost fell over when I saw this footage, because Fox has done it's best to ignore, skew, misdirect, lie, cover-up, and distort anything that is associated with Ron Paul.

What is going on here? Seriously.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Realtruth
 


The Reporters name is Harris Faulkner and she pointed out he did the best much to the dismay of her coanchor. Show your support for her on her FB if you so choose. You have the power



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Realtruth
 




The anchor lady MAKES him say that Ron Paul did "the best" not just "well."
He didn't want to say it, but it was the truth. This was a Twitter Poll though, and we know Ron Paul carries the youth quite well.

I have been posting many of these videos to Facebook, and getting good feedback.

To be perfectly Honest, this wasn't Ron Paul's best debate. He rambled, and got flustered a time or two. Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich really stole the show I thought, but Ron Paul is still the best candidate for the presidency in my opinion.
edit on 18-1-2012 by getreadyalready because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:37 AM
link   
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 



Yes, I could see that he was uncomfortable and covering his ass when she weighed in. Classic.

And yes I'll support her. Can you please post a link for us? Thanks.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 10:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by getreadyalready

The anchor lady MAKES him say that Ron Paul did "the best" not just "well."
He didn't want to say it, but it was the truth. This was a Twitter Poll though, and we know Ron Paul carries the youth quite well.



It really restores my faith in the USA when the "Youth" are this much in touch. My hats are off to them, they seem to be able to differentiate between blatant ongoing corruption and lies, and what really needs to happen. The truth and cleaning up of years of corruption.

If this is where the USA is headed, then I have allot of confidence in our very near future.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 11:02 AM
link   
Or maybe fox have never been biased. From what I have seen fox have given each candidate equal coverage.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 11:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Or maybe fox have never been biased. From what I have seen fox have given each candidate equal coverage.


You actually need to turn on your tv to watch fox...your post leaves me to believe you haven't....



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 11:17 AM
link   
That looks like the twitter poll from debate. It wasn't about which candidate they liked. It was about whether the candidate answered the question or dodged the question. The green above the line means the candidate honestly answered the questions. Ron Paul was completely above the green on all of his questions. So yes he was best for that poll but it wasn't about his beliefs, just whether or not the voter thought he honestly answered the questions.

I saw the same thing on Hannity after the debate (can't stand him but watched to see what was said). They never showed Paul in the overall. They did show him on individual sections but not the overall.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 11:17 AM
link   
That clip tells you all you need to know right there.

That guy was absolutely purposely avoiding having to say that Ron Paul did the best.
I mean, he says, "Ron Paul did pretty well too"

Ron Pauls numbers were well above everyone elses and all he can say is "Ron Paul did pretty well too"?!?!?!
It was KILLING him to be FORCED to say he did the best.
He was literally squirming!
If this doesn't prove that these people are bought and paid for I don't know what will.

On the other hand,
How bout his co-anchor???
Where does she get the balls to call him out like that??
Good for her.
Now this raises more questions than it answers.
Why is she not bought and paid for?
Does she still have a job now?
Why is SHE allowed to so clearly go against her masters?

This is truely a revolution of massive proportions.

Now, in order to fulfill my obligations as a card carrying ATS Doom and Gloomer I would have to wonder,......

If this momentum keeps gaining and TPTB see that the people are demanding their freedoms be restored by overwhelmingly backing Mr Paul, thereby ensuring that they lose their grip on the American Presidency, what's to stop them/their puppet Obama from pulling the carpet out from underneath us at the last minute and declaring Martial Law???



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 11:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Or maybe fox have never been biased. From what I have seen fox have given each candidate equal coverage.
That is without question the dumbest thing posted here this year. What do you hope to accomplish making foolish statements like that?



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 11:35 AM
link   
The only thing this shows is that Ron Paul supporters are more active on the internet than the others.

I don't think you need a poll to know this. We have seen for the past year Ron Paul winning internet polls with 80-90% of the vote...but that didn't translate very well to actual voting...did it???

I'll just stick with the credible polls that have been pretty spot on with the first two elections for this primary.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 12:00 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 
When you find a 'credible' poll, let us know. The way they poll anymore, it reminds me of the good lawyer. Never ask a question you don't already know the answer to. Poll results are reported in the msm, and that tells me all I need to know about their veracity.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 12:05 PM
link   
reply to post by dillweed
 


Check out the RealClearPolitics average for Iowa and NH and compare it with the actual results.

Here is Iowa:
www.realclearpolitics.com...

Here is NH:
www.realclearpolitics.com...


Yes, I'd say pretty darn accurate. It's never going to be perfect...and the polls couldn't capture the end of Santorum's surge in Iowa...but I will trust these any day over a "twitter poll". Or any other internet based poll.

Romney will easily win SC...and it is looking like he will have a big win in FL. Ron Paul is fighting for third place in SC, and he won't even contest FL...where he will being fighting for third place as well.

You are free to use any poll you want, or any type of gauge to see who will win these elections...but I am going to use the ones that match the closest to reality.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 12:08 PM
link   
Haha, that was classic!

"Ron Paul did well too"... Umm, no dude, Ron Paul OBLITERATED the others in almost every category.

To be fair, this co-anchor is obviously good at his job - deflection.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 12:10 PM
link   
Remember, this was not a poll, those meters were to determine who was answering questions directly and who was dodging them as the debate carried on. Not who did the best, not who people preferred the most, etc... Just to be fair. I did not expect them to put that up there afterwards though, with Ron Paul at the top of it and all.



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 12:33 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast SearcherAm I to believe that you intend to vote for the most 'popular' candidate, based on polling data? I know in your case that's not true, because you obviously take Obama pills, but many uninformed voters do. I would love to see pollsters banned as part of election reform.
 



new topics

top topics



 
11
<<   2 >>

log in

join