It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ARandomAfflictionOfSense
I wonder how religious folk would feel if a group of atheists started a campain to teach science in Sunday School.
Originally posted by predator0187
reply to post by ARandomAfflictionOfSense
To compare atheism and religion is ignorant.
Did I compare the two in your veiw?I'm sorry but I think you miss understood me.Non religious don't impose their views in religious class so religious views need to stay out of science class.That is all.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Richard dawkins is an idiot. I have a degree in physics and a lot of what he states can be debunked, not only that he makes ridiculous analogies.
The unicorn is one example. Unicorn is a mythical creature by definition, whereas God is not.
Also scientific evidence is NOT a prerequiste for proof.
The most accurate theory in physics is QED, and it is still an approximation. Sixty years ago people thought the atom could not be split, yet here we do it every day. This guy is extremely ignorant and does not understand that most people who know physics know that there is an underlying designer.
Originally posted by ARandomAfflictionOfSense
Originally posted by predator0187
reply to post by ARandomAfflictionOfSense
To compare atheism and religion is ignorant.
Did I compare the two in your veiw?I'm sorry but I think you miss understood me.Non religious don't impose their views in religious class so religious views need to stay out of science class.That is all.
Originally posted by troubleshooter
Dawkins is just selling popular books ... he has not been taken seriously by any real scientists and none of his books have gained favourable reviews. He is a scientist by profession who has failed to seriously address real philosphical and religious issues. Dawkins popularity and influence will not outlive him for long.
To know a thing is wrong you need to show a thing is wrong and why.
Under the new agreement, funding will be withdrawn for any free school that teaches what it claims are "evidence-based views or theories" that run "contrary to established scientific and/or historical evidence and explanations".
Originally posted by Barcs
Originally posted by troubleshooter
Dawkins is just selling popular books ... he has not been taken seriously by any real scientists and none of his books have gained favourable reviews. He is a scientist by profession who has failed to seriously address real philosphical and religious issues. Dawkins popularity and influence will not outlive him for long.
Huh? What do you mean he hasn't been taken seriously? He is a SCIENTIST, and does not NEED to address philosophy or religion. Science is about physical evidence, not philosophy and guesswork.
Originally posted by skonaz
reply to post by Astyanax
Surely evolution could be designed intelligently ?
So do I, I'm open to it myself. It's just that in school the place to discuss these sorts of ideas is comparative religion or history classes, where they can be understood in their proper context as ideas stemming from religious belief which have their origins in historical societies. With any luck, if the child wishes to learn more, their proper place then becomes philosophy...
Originally posted by HappyBunny
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Astyanax
Can you be an evolutionist who believes in a creator and not get flamed even if you do not think that religion or creation should be taught in schools? I certainly hope the world of enlightened men are open to that.
edit on 18-1-2012 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
I think a lot of evolutionists are open to that idea.
One of the most important things to get to grips with when discussing the current scientific theories about the origins of the universe, and for many people one of the most difficult, is that many of us cannot understand those theories despite the fact that what we have heard about them is a dumbed-down version intended for popular media. In a way it's no wonder that so many people think that the theoretical physics of the origins of the universe, evolutionary biology and creation myths are all ideas which can be compared to each other.
Originally posted by bargoose
Originally posted by HappyBunny
Originally posted by kingofmd
This is the equivalent to Stalin claiming a victory over his dissenters, when he sent them to the gulags. Why not win the debate in an actual debate. Pretty sad when the only way your worldview will be accepted is when you completely silence the opposition.
You're not silenced. You still have the opportunity to go to church and practice your beliefs. But those beliefs have no place in a public school science classroom and you don't have the right to force them on other people's children.
Well then evolution and the big bang shouldn't be taught in a classroom either. It is only a theory. A belief. Just like someones belief in creationism.
I mean, the idea that nothing produced something, and then that some thing decided to organize itself into a highly complex universe for no real reason, is as absurd to me as the idea of creationism is to you.
Originally posted by borntowatch
as a Christian taxpayer who wants my taxes to represent me and my family I would like to see the stupid religion of evolution stopped being taught.
I know that wont happen so as a taxpayer I would like to see ID taught alongside evolution.
To all the peculiar people who would like to accept the earth was seeded by aliens, please tell me where did those aliens come from.
Evolution doesnt happen. it cant.
This absurd suggestion that taxpayers dont want to see ID taught in schools is fallacious and inane.
We dont live in a dictatorship....yet!
Originally posted by colin42
Originally posted by borntowatch
as a Christian taxpayer who wants my taxes to represent me and my family I would like to see the stupid religion of evolution stopped being taught.
I know that wont happen so as a taxpayer I would like to see ID taught alongside evolution.
To all the peculiar people who would like to accept the earth was seeded by aliens, please tell me where did those aliens come from.
Evolution doesnt happen. it cant.
This absurd suggestion that taxpayers dont want to see ID taught in schools is fallacious and inane.
We dont live in a dictatorship....yet!
So given that you believe evolution to be a stupid religion and you want it to be stopped being taught then you must accept others think your religion is stupid and should also stop being taught?
What religion out the the many do you class as the correct one that should be taught. Good luck with that one.
You are happy for ID to be taught in biology classes, Are you just as happy to have alchemy taught in chemistry class? Should we teach how lightning is made by angry gods in physics class?
Why not fill all the empty churches in the UK and teach ID there in its proper place if you believe there are many people clammering to be taught it?
You pay taxes because you are required too and you probably dont live in the UK if you have to ask if we live in a dictatorship.