To this day there is ZERO LEGITIMATE (Non-Zionist) sources that suggest Iran is after a nuclear weapon
Our calculations show that Iran's plan to enrich uranium to 20 percent in a single cascade is likely not the best option for fuel production, but it's also hardly a great advancement toward a weapons capability. If Iran wanted to quickly produce the amount of material needed to fuel the Tehran Research Reactor, it could legally use the entire 23 cascades currently operating at the Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz, where it would take only four months to produce the 115.8 kilograms required to fuel the reactor for about 20 years. It would take less than another month to produce enough 20 percent material to make bomb-grade uranium, ultimately reducing the time to a weapon by one-half. But Iran has shown no indication that it wants to expand that capacity.
www.thebulletin.org...
In 2010, Iran said it had increased the enrichment of uranium from the 3.5% needed for commercial nuclear reactors to the 10-20% needed for a research reactor near Tehran
Weapons-grade uranium is at least 90% enriched
www.bbc.co.uk...
20%, and 90%. There is a HUGE difference so calm the $#% down because if Iran were really after the bomb their enrichment of Uranium would be taken much more seriously
How many times do some of you idiots buy into this form of fear SO easily? Even if it's been proven you've been lied to in the past, and by the same people!
weapons of mass destruction, evil terrorists, axil of evil, weapons of mass destruction, they hate American's, 911, aaaand weapons of mass destruction
5. Iran should not have a nuclear weapon, it poses a danger to the entire world
EVEN if Iran was after a nuclear weapon, they have every right to as a party member of the NPT
The current Iranian regime is stupid.. but not stupid enough to perform an action that would result in their inevitable annihilation
Do you seriously think they would use a nuclear weapon against anyone?
Ever heard of mutually assured destruction?
Does that ring a bell?
Or only when its used in the context of the cold war ?
IF Iran were after a nuclear weapon it would be for the sole purpose of its own defense. Foreign bloodthirsty and oil-thirsty countries like US and Israel wouldn't have a chance at Iran's natural resources if it were ever to posses a nuclear weapon
Look at the history, Iran has been consistently violated of it's stability and resources by western powers. It has not attacked a SINGLE country in the past 100 years, and has only been attacked BY western forces in the past 100 years
If anything, the most dangerous country in the entire world to posses a nuclear weapon, includes the same people trying to prevent Iran from having one: The United States of America. The only country to ever use a nuclear weapon on people resulting in the deaths of almost 200,000 civilians.
Ask yourself how many wars has the US started in the past 10 years?
And don't tell me it's because of 911 because your a disgrace to the motto of this website if you believe the official story
-------------------------
Now I'm personally not for Iran or anyone obtaining a nuclear weapon, but nor am I for hypocritical imperialists preventing others from having them to expand their never-ending theft of natural resources from foreign countries
It is sad to see that, although some see past the paradigm the elite have forged to keep us divided, they still remain oblivious to the reality that EVERYTHING they force down our throats is a LIE. The point is, it doesn't matter if Iran is after nuclear weapons or not! Western powers are after the regime of Iran to achieve total and indefinite domination of the middle east to further their plans of establishing their New World Order, which is the real enemy of humanity, not the ordinary citizens of the nations of this world!
edit on 17-1-2012 by seenavv because: (no reason
given)
