Thanks for this post, pretty interesting stuff,

however in my opinion I would take what this guys says with a pinch of salt

Originally posted by ecksalin
Thanks for this post, pretty interesting stuff,

however in my opinion I would take what this guys says with a pinch of salt

Is there any specific reason why you say this?

Originally posted by VeniVidi

Originally posted by ecksalin
Thanks for this post, pretty interesting stuff,

however in my opinion I would take what this guys says with a pinch of salt

Is there any specific reason why you say this?

I agree with ecksalin and while I can't speak for ecksalin's reasons for saying this, I can give you mine.

The letter implies that the fog seen in some cities is artificial. This is an extraordinary claim, which without extraordinary evidence, lacks any credibility.

Also the claim to have identified the unidentified flying objects is another extraordinary claim, especially the part "I do assure you these objects of the sky will never bring harm to anyone", another extraordinary claim.

As Carl Sagan said, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", and since there's virtually no evidence at all any of these claims in the letter are true, it's hard to take the letter seriously at all. If you read many threads on ATS you find plenty of people making claims with no evidence at all, and I'm sure it happened 60 years ago as well as today, the main difference being 60 years ago they didn't have the internet so you didn't hear about them as much.