It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Oh, the old trick of quoting centuries dead founders. Too bad that is not the law.
You mean to act like civilized humans instead of wolves? Everything I do is not so I can profit one way or another because that is what an animal does, not a sentient being.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by chr0naut
Your country holds the keys to the destruction of the world and has shown irresponsibility in use of that power.
Please think about that.
But you're fine with adding another nuclear stockpile?? Because allowing Iran to move forward will accomplish exactly that, friend. Iran is a country whose leaders chant DEATH TO AMERICA, DEATH TO ISRAEL, DEATH TO ENGLAND, DEATH TO THE WEST. I think they've demonstrated their intent to use them....at least enough for me.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by TsukiLunar
Oh, the old trick of quoting centuries dead founders. Too bad that is not the law.
The Supreme Law of the Land in the United States of America is the Constitution for the United States of America and all subsequent legislation must be harmonious with that Supreme Law of the Land or it is null and void. This remains as true today - in spite of what your easy to read and dubious Wikipedia articles might tell you - as it was when those ever tricky centuries dead Founders were alive.
You citing legislation subsequent to the 2nd Amendment with the intent of refuting the 2nd Amendment was your most egregious legal argument, but certainly not the only idiotic one you have made.
The fact of the matter is that no distinctions were made as to what type of arms We the People could arm ourselves with, and Congress, nor any other governing branch has any lawful authority to repeal, or amend that Amendment.
Originally posted by chr0naut
This is what Wikileaks and Anonymous are doing, passively resisting.
Me too.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by chr0naut
This is what Wikileaks and Anonymous are doing, passively resisting.
Me too.
Meanwhile Wikileaks has exposed the fact that Iran's neighbors want nothing to do with Iran developing Nuclear weapons and have each covertly pressed the US to take action [Which was refused] so now what?
As a matter a fact there were distinctions made. I linked them in a post addressed to you, but obviously did not read.
Originally posted by chr0naut
This is what Wikileaks and Anonymous are doing, passively resisting.
Me too.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by chr0naut
This is what Wikileaks and Anonymous are doing, passively resisting.
Me too.
Meanwhile Wikileaks has exposed the fact that Iran's neighbors want nothing to do with Iran developing Nuclear weapons and have each covertly pressed the US to take action [Which was refused] so now what?
Originally posted by Wookiep
I say stay out of it. We're broke. If Mexico had nukes would we ask Russia to take care of it? Just curious, If Israel felt threatened enough to ask for our help, would you be opposed to getting congressional approval, getting the job done, then getting out?
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by TsukiLunar
As a matter a fact there were distinctions made. I linked them in a post addressed to you, but obviously did not read.
As a matter of fact, the Second Amendment makes no distinctions as to what type of arms We the People can keep and bear. Try to keep up, Bub.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Then there is a time and place to man-up and kick some ass.
Man, you keep repeating that, but its still illegal to own a nuke. No matter what you say you absolutely will not get away with it and you will absolutely be charged by the law. End of story. Do I need to go over what illegal means?
How does not letting you posses nukes infringe upon this right? You can still have your guns. You can bear arms. Also, your not a militia by any stretch. Much less a well regulated one.
Originally posted by chr0naut
... but why the US? Why not the UN?
Why not an alliance of nations opposing nuclear proliferation and pursuing a de-nuclearization of the world.?
... and what of North Korea in all this? Why doesn't the US stop their atomic ambitions?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Wookiep
I say stay out of it. We're broke. If Mexico had nukes would we ask Russia to take care of it? Just curious, If Israel felt threatened enough to ask for our help, would you be opposed to getting congressional approval, getting the job done, then getting out?
I'm not advocating an attack on Iran but let me ask you this?
Israel has had nukes going back longer than the present Iranian Regime been around. Why haven't they attacked or nuked Iran and esp when Iran and Iraq were going at it? It's obvious from some replies [Not yours] that simply discussing the issues is for them an example of being "Brainwashed"
pffft.
No one has the right to own nuclear weapons. Not any individual, nor any government ordained by individuals.
Man you keep repeating that, but the fact still remains that no authority has been granted to any governing body within the United States to declare such ownership illegal.
More importantly, your continued focus on who can own nuclear weapons only reveals your utter zeal for the existence of them.
I will say it for a third time, even if it goes over your poor, poor, pitiful head; No one has the right to own nuclear weapons. Not any individual, nor any government ordained by individuals.