It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Y2KJMan
Here is a montage of RP today... courtesy of the Daily Paul
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by WhereAreTheGoodguys
OutKast
The boo's came during questions about War and what not. If you are still around I'd like to ask you what is your personal stance on War in general and then the War on Terror ... and if you have time the NDAA ?
I'm not for war...which is why I'm not a Republican. I agree with Ron Paul on his foreign policy...it's his domestic policy that I think is crazy.
Ron Paul getting boo'd for his anti-war stance at a Republican debate should be expected...but for some reason Ron Paul supporters think that since Ron Paul said it, the Republican base should throw out their foreign policy platform and bow down to him.
I've said it so many times now...Ron Paul has a duplicity issue. Conservatives like his domestic policy and hate his foreign policy, Liberals like his foreign policy and hate his domestic issues.
There is a very small minority that actually agree with both...that is his passionate base (10-15%). The rest of the votes he gets are Conservatives that are willing to sacrafice their beliefs in foreign policy to support his domestic policy or Liberals that are willing to sacrafice their beliefs in their domestic policies to support his foreign policy...this is another 5% or so.
This is why Ron Paul won't ever be elected.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
I've said it so many times now...Ron Paul has a duplicity issue. Conservatives like his domestic policy and hate his foreign policy, Liberals like his foreign policy and hate his domestic issues.
There is a very small minority that actually agree with both...that is his passionate base (10-15%). The rest of the votes he gets are Conservatives that are willing to sacrafice their beliefs in foreign policy to support his domestic policy or Liberals that are willing to sacrafice their beliefs in their domestic policies to support his foreign policy...this is another 5% or so.
This is why Ron Paul won't ever be elected.
Originally posted by snowcrash911
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
I've said it so many times now...Ron Paul has a duplicity issue. Conservatives like his domestic policy and hate his foreign policy, Liberals like his foreign policy and hate his domestic issues.
There is a very small minority that actually agree with both...that is his passionate base (10-15%). The rest of the votes he gets are Conservatives that are willing to sacrafice their beliefs in foreign policy to support his domestic policy or Liberals that are willing to sacrafice their beliefs in their domestic policies to support his foreign policy...this is another 5% or so.
This is why Ron Paul won't ever be elected.
That all sounds very insightful and compelling, until you realize that under Obama, "liberals" are asked to sacrifice both their domestic and foreign policy principles for the sake of "not being too leftist".
They fact is, Obama is so far to the extreme right that if Ron Paul's foreign policy is all "liberals" are going to get out of him, they will.
That's why Ron Paul could indeed get elected. All this "unelectable" propaganda from Fox must have infected your brain through repetition. I'm no fan of Ron Paul, but the fact is, there are large segments of the American populace willing to vote for him out of sheer desperation.
Obama is a sell out, a coward, a two-faced hypocrite, a pathological liar and a tool, who has sought after and executed the betrayal of his own base to perfection.
Originally posted by buni11687
In my opinion, this debate was....so-so. It started out pretty strong, especially with all the attacks against Romney. I think Gingrich, Santorum, and Perry did better than expected.
Romney took some hits tonight. My favorite was when Santorum called him out for avoiding the question in the beginning of the debate. Im not sure how much these attacks will affect his numbers though.
As a Paul supporter, I think he did very good. But when he was asked about the Bin Laden raid, the audience was very torn during that part. I dont think it will hurt his current support (Obviously I still support Paul) , but Im not sure how well it will go over with other Republican voters in SCedit on 16-1-2012 by buni11687 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by snowcrash911That all sounds very insightful and compelling, until you realize that under Obama, "liberals" are asked to sacrifice both their domestic and foreign policy principles for the sake of "not being too leftist".
They fact is, Obama is so far to the extreme right that if Ron Paul's foreign policy is all "liberals" are going to get out of him, they will.
That's why Ron Paul could indeed get elected. All this "unelectable" propaganda from Fox must have infected your brain through repetition. I'm no fan of Ron Paul, but the fact is, there are large segments of the American populace willing to vote for him out of sheer desperation.
Obama is a sell out, a coward, a two-faced hypocrite, a pathological liar and a tool, who has sought after and executed the betrayal of his own base to perfection.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by samcrow
So this November 2012 you will voting for ABO?
Anybody But Obama
Originally posted by Nite_wing
reply to post by samcrow
I had to look up the meaning of neo-Randian. It think it fits well.
Ronald Paul has sponsored 421 bills since Jan 7, 1997 of which 418 haven't made it out of committee and 1 were successfully enacted.