It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dreamer99
reply to post by Starchild23
I don't trust him. I have never heard of a politician who had so many people rooting for him.
What you're seeing there is people cheering for the constitution, and liberty. Ron Paul is just the current voice of the people that don't want their Liberties taken from them.
Originally posted by 6Eyengineer
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
I think mossme89 was just making an observation, and stating his opinion, which I'm pretty sure is acceptable for a forum like this.
Also I'm fairly certain he was directing his question to RP supporters, which guessing by your response, you are not.
... there are some folks who are unrelenting and obsessive in their attacks on RP.
Originally posted by Starchild23
Originally posted by Dreamer99
reply to post by Starchild23
I don't trust him. I have never heard of a politician who had so many people rooting for him.
What you're seeing there is people cheering for the constitution, and liberty. Ron Paul is just the current voice of the people that don't want their Liberties taken from them.
No, what I'm seeing is a POLITICIAN seeing what the people want and agreeing with them so they'll think he's the best man for the job.
All men talk, but not every man walks.
Originally posted by jaws1975
I think what frustrates a lot of RP supporters is the ignorant and stupid things people say like he's the antichrist because he's just to good to be true, or he's just like Obama promising the moon and not gonna come through with the promises. I am all for a discussion on the issues, if you don't like RP because of his actual stance on the issues fine I can respect that. Just don't come across like an uninformed pot stirrer, or somebody is gonna eat your lunch!
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by Dreamer99
reply to post by Starchild23
I don't trust him. I have never heard of a politician who had so many people rooting for him.
What you're seeing there is people cheering for the constitution, and liberty. Ron Paul is just the current voice of the people that don't want their Liberties taken from them.
See? Arrogance. I know NO ONE in real life that even likes Paul. Are they not the American people? Cause Paul sure the hell aint their voice.
Originally posted by jaws1975
I think what frustrates a lot of RP supporters is the ignorant and stupid things people say like he's the antichrist because he's just to good to be true, or he's just like Obama promising the moon and not gonna come through with the promises. I am all for a discussion on the issues, if you don't like RP because of his actual stance on the issues fine I can respect that. Just don't come across like an uninformed pot stirrer, or somebody is gonna eat your lunch!
See? Arrogance. I know NO ONE in real life that even likes Paul. Are they not the American people? Cause Paul sure the hell aint their voice.
Originally posted by mossme89
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
It's not really you. At least you back up what you say with facts. But it's other people who just say random things like "Paul sucks" or "He's unelectable" or "he's obviously a fraud." Things that can clearly be debunked.
Like this guy a few posts back:
See? Arrogance. I know NO ONE in real life that even likes Paul. Are they not the American people? Cause Paul sure the hell aint their voice.
edit on 16-1-2012 by mossme89 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by mossme89
Well I appreciate that. Unfortunately, I don't think all of your fellow RP supporters share your view of me.
And you have what you describe on both sides. You have those that pop in, say a one liner hit on Ron Paul and leave. You also have those that pop in, say "Ron Paul 2012" with a picture or a video and leave. Neither contribute to the discussion and both are part of the problem.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by mossme89
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
It's not really you. At least you back up what you say with facts. But it's other people who just say random things like "Paul sucks" or "He's unelectable" or "he's obviously a fraud." Things that can clearly be debunked.
Like this guy a few posts back:
See? Arrogance. I know NO ONE in real life that even likes Paul. Are they not the American people? Cause Paul sure the hell aint their voice.
edit on 16-1-2012 by mossme89 because: (no reason given)
What the hell did i say that can clearly be debunked?
Originally posted by android18957392
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by Dreamer99
reply to post by Starchild23
I don't trust him. I have never heard of a politician who had so many people rooting for him.
What you're seeing there is people cheering for the constitution, and liberty. Ron Paul is just the current voice of the people that don't want their Liberties taken from them.
See? Arrogance. I know NO ONE in real life that even likes Paul. Are they not the American people? Cause Paul sure the hell aint their voice.
This is comical. Nobody likes Paul? Why is he at the top of the straw polls and online surveys, yet the digital voting just doesn't add up? And I suppose you see Romney, Santorum or Grinch making more positive changes? Wait, I already know the response to that. "I wouldn't vote for any of them" yet you will expend energy to bash Paul? Once again very fishy.
Trolling is absolutely happening. View the post history of those profiles that drift into paul threads and post obvious inflammatory comments. Their other posts follow zionist thinking as well. So, if they aren't paid to do it, it really doesn't make a difference. Either way they are representing more of the same, and they seem to be ok with that. Most people are not ok with more of the same. Obvious trolling is happening.
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by Mescalito
Sure thing, friend, and no worries - that's what I'm here for. For a summary from the man himself, I'd suggest checking out a thread of mine linked in my signature, which links to his full "My Plan for a freedom president" that fairly sums up his goals and limitations.
For the quick summary - he wants to restore the government to its constitutional scope and authority/limits (basically shrink it back to the role it was founded to fill), leaving the rest up to the states & people to craft as they see fit; restore privacy to the people and reverse the roles we've grown into (government being afraid of the people so there is liberty, and not people being afraid of the government so that it practices any form of tyranny); stop bad military and foreign policies that make us more likely to be targeted while also being less able to effectively defend ourselves; let the people and states keep more of their own money since big government just keeps getting bigger while becoming less efficient; and restoring more of our former dignity on the world scene by practicing the international policy of our founding fathers: peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.
As far as his limitations in office, which he acknowledges, a good part of what he aims for (mainly changing our domestic and financial policies here at home) would require cooperation of Congress. However, there is quite a lot he can do on his own as president - the list I usually run down is:
1) order the troops home, end the wars, stop the involved money from being wasted, and prevent further loss of civilian life and lessen desire for retaliation against the US.
2) revoke all prior overreaching and unconstitutional executive directives.
3) order the DOJ to stop interfering with states' rights regarding their own laws on medi MJ, foods, and the rest.
4) pardon non-violent "offender" victims of the drug war.
5) shrink big government by refusing to fill non-essential position vacancies (attrition).
6) use the bully pulpit of the Executive Office to educate the american people and push for rational change via their representatives
7) restore some dignity to the office finally - no crappy gifts to foreign heads of state that don't even work in their nation, no bowing to foreign leaders, HONESTY AND FRANKNESS WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE for a change, no Bush-style embarassments...ugh, bushisms...
8) I suppose it's important to add one of the most obvious powers in vetoing unconstitutional, unhelpful, or stupid legislation as well as unbalanced budgets.
There are probably a few little things I'm missing, but those are the big things that fall primarily to the discretion of the executive branch itself - and they are very significant and needed, at this point.
Let me know if I can provide anything else - take care.edit on 1/16/2012 by Praetorius because: (no reason given)