Well, I keep on wondering what the essential question of this interesting research is.
The stars of the Seven Seers are supposed to move perceptibly in contrast to other stars?
Or is it merely that the change of the angle of the ecliptic over great historical spans of time would posit them at different angles to the circle of
the nakshatras?
I will re-read your interesting source until I grasp the essence.
It would be great if you elaborated on the exact question you brought up.
I am a Vedic astrologer and I studied the nakshatras extensively and apply them in everday astrology. In my humble experience during the past decade,
the ayanamsha of Lahiri was pretty close from the POV of sankranthis - entrance of grahas to signs or nakshatras.
In my understanding it is not the "wobble of the Earth's axis" that causes precession because the planets are also seen as preceding - Jupiter and
Saturn, thus the whole Solar System is in the - approximately 25,920 year-long - cycle. (Dhruva in ancient times was said to be Vega.) If you divide
25,920 years by 27, you get 960 years - this may be what the scripture alludes to.
I think it would also help other readers less well-versed in Jyotish or astronomy if we explained or translated a few thoughts to plainer language.
I will check back shortly.




