......but
none-the-less I think it is important to note that all the real studies of such "remedies" keep coming up with the same sort of conclusions. Of course there is a well established conspiracy here -
Gilbey said people were paying big money for products and therapies that did nothing.
but because it is a real conspiracy of course it's no fun at all to investigate - there's no reason to speculate or theorise about it
As for those small number of alternative remedies that ARE effective - the article notes that
"The difficulty for people is, which are the 5 per cent of products and therapies worth trying? Use the ones with evidence behind them.
"The problem is people go on the internet, which is not reliable."
People often assumed a product or therapy worked because reputable people endorsed it in advertisements, he said.
and it is actually difficult to find any rational evidence for effective natural remedies - I've been loking for a bit before writing this, and the 'net is simply overflowing with anecdotal accounts, advertising, etc - I haven't actually been able to find any such documentation at all outside of the Cochrane Review pages linked to - and for herbal medicine that concluded:
Less that half the Cochrane reviews on vitamins and minerals conclude that there is a possibly positive effect or promising results in connection with the tested products.
The majority of the reviews call for more and better research in their field. This is due to the fact that often there is insufficient evidence on which to draw conclusions about the effect of the vitamins and minerals in question.
There are seldom reports of any severe adverse effects.
www.stuff.co.nz
(visit the link for the full news article)
edit on 15-1-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



