Originally posted by nyk537
I'd be more worried about the mans foreign policy (or really lack thereof) if I were you.
Food-stamps won't do you much good if he were to let Iran get a nuke and start WW3 by wiping Israel off the map (like they have promised to do).
Yeah, sorry nyk, but I'm going to have to jump on this one as well. *To my knowledge*, Paul is the only candidate who has been endorsed by multiple
(some/all former) military intelligence, CIA, and terrorism experts, as well as agreed with by Israeli current and former intelligence as well,
specifically FOR his foreign policy views.
You can find some information on this in my signature thread So Ron Paul's foreign policy is crazy?, but as confirmed by Israeli intelligence, Iran
is only seeking a bomb - if in fact they are - as a defensive measure to dissuade us from messing with them. And, even if they get a bomb, Israel
acknowledges it's not an existential threat anyway (first off, even if Iran DID want to wipe Israel off the map in contradiction of their own
survival instinct, constitution, and religious faith - they WOULD NOT want to kill the palestinians who would also be caught up in such a situation,
even if their concern for non-aggressor civilians otherwise in light of muslim dictates were discounted. Coupled with the fact that they are likely
well aware Israel is more than equipped to strategically turn them into a smoking hole in the ground, this is effectively a non-issue, initial
silliness of the idea aside). Israel has said time and time again they are strong enough to handle their own problems - as they have also proven
multiple times - and would rather not be hampered by us limiting their own options when it comes to what they feel is necessary for their defense.
I'm not sure why people confuse "not causing problems for yourself while continuing to have the most advanced and well-funded military on the
planet" with "not having a foreign policy." Granted, Paul would otherwise subscribe to the (wise) dictates of those who founded this nation for
good reason and not impose our will on or interfere with the internal actions or self-determination of other nations, but that doesn't mean not
having intelligence capabilities or not responding to acknowledged threats or actual aggression. As it stands now, we have so much overlap,
jurisdictional squabbles, and various other inefficiencies in our intelligence gathering and reporting processes that even valid threats we find are
lost in the shuffle or have otherwise simply been ignored by our administrations (e.g. 9/11 - intelligence being disregarded, agency investigations
essentially shut down, CIA forcing offices to provide visas to terrorists, etc.) that a trim is NECESSARY to streamline operations as well as put the
fear of job loss into these people so the shenanigans cease.
As Robert David Steele (former Marine Intelligence and CIA case handler) says in his youtube video on Santorum & Paul, Paul is the ONLY candidate
actually serious about national security and with any actual knowledge of what he's talking about.
Take care.