It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As best as i can tell,if any two countries are going to ignite ww-3,its going to be pakistan and india,who border eachother,who basically hate eachother and they both have nuclear weapons...
Originally posted by victor7
reply to post by Observor
I don't think that Russia should pre-empt an attack on US-NATO. I would be a blunder. However by 2015 or so, if Russia has not developed a technology to cancel out the ABM system in Poland and Czech republic and rest of Europe, i.e. in other words, watch its own nuclear deterrent cancelled out, then Russia should aggressively have this system removed. Given the US-West approach of not yielding an inch unless their own house is threatened with calamity, the matters can go real hot and even some shots might be fired. It would also be a blunder on Russia's part to sit on a pile of nukes which do not have the responsive i.e. deterrent capability anymore.
Russia might have to place its missiles in friendly nations also in order to tit-for-tat this ABM system. We are talking Cuban missile crisis again. We might even see the weaponization of space, whereby satellites and space stations are loaded with nukes and other killer systems to attack other countries. I think currently there is a treaty out there to 'not weaponize the space' but if matters heat up and alternatives are not there, then countries will go onto space to seek deterrent type protection. However that would be extremely risky as these satellites etc. can fail, burn up and fall into earth and rest is only a matter of wild imagination.
I don't think that Russia should pre-empt an attack on US-NATO. I would be a blunder.
However by 2015 or so, if Russia has not developed a technology to cancel out the ABM system in Poland and Czech republic and rest of Europe, i.e. in other words, watch its own nuclear deterrent cancelled out, then Russia should aggressively have this system removed.
Given the US-West approach of not yielding an inch unless their own house is threatened with calamity, the matters can go real hot and even some shots might be fired.
It would also be a blunder on Russia's part to sit on a pile of nukes which do not have the responsive i.e. deterrent capability anymore.
Russia might have to place its missiles in friendly nations also in order to tit-for-tat this ABM system. We are talking Cuban missile crisis again.
We might even see the weaponization of space, whereby satellites and space stations are loaded with nukes and other killer systems to attack other countries. I think currently there is a treaty out there to 'not weaponize the space' but if matters heat up and alternatives are not there, then countries will go onto space to seek deterrent type protection. However that would be extremely risky as these satellites etc. can fail, burn up and fall into earth and rest is only a matter of wild imagination.
Originally posted by blocula
Which ever country,the USA or Russia,has the better top secret weapons,will be the country that feels confident enough to provoke war by assaulting the other with those weapons.Imagine "if" Russia and China were able to knock out all US military communication satellites,that would be really bad news,the US would be more or less thrown back into the early 1950's.
Originally posted by Observor
Originally posted by blocula
Which ever country,the USA or Russia,has the better top secret weapons,will be the country that feels confident enough to provoke war by assaulting the other with those weapons.Imagine "if" Russia and China were able to knock out all US military communication satellites,that would be really bad news,the US would be more or less thrown back into the early 1950's.
West has been forever trying to expand its hold on the world through military might, while others are merely trying to retain the control on their own territories by their military strength.
Even if either Russia or China were to surpass the West in military capability, neither would be initiating an attack on the West. However if they were to lose their capability to resist a Western expansion into their territories, they would be sitting ducks and the West would overrun them militarily to impose its own will. China doesn't face that prospect immediately, but Russia does.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
You guy's are kidding right? The only thing that is going on is that Russia is pissed off that so many X-Territories of the Former Soviet Union are desperatly trying to become a part of NATO because of the way they were treated for over 40 Years.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by victor7
Today missiles need not be sitting on launchers to be deployed. Lots of cruise missiles and anti ship missiles can be covertly in place without more than a dozen people knowing about them. The point is right i.e. which country would want to take enmity with West for Russia. Russia might have to devise technologies to counter the western aggressive posture and abilities that threaten to negate Russia's nuclear deterrence.
Atleast regarding Iran and Syria, Russia should covertly deploy some real sharp weapons for just in case scenario.
Originally posted by victor7
While Russians are behind the west in technological terms, they are not so much behind that they would not know that a super advanced ABM has already been deployed that would cancel out their offensive capability in terms of nuclear missiles. If that was the case, Russians would have gone crazy out of fear and started throwing all sorts of efforts to cancel this system out.
Originally posted by blocula
All that needs to happen is a few meetings,a few signatures and a few firm handshakes and Russia,China and North Korea are allied as one and its game over for the USA...
Originally posted by victor7
If such a military alliance like SCO is made then many other countries like Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Iraq, India, Venenzuela, Brazil, and several many others will not only beg but also pay to join in. The world only respects the strong and brave.
The Warsaw pact lost out due to the economic and social system it followed which was no match for the free and market oriented economy of the west. With mostly similar system at place already a SCO type alliance can trample on the US-NATO and leave it in ruins.
Originally posted by blocula
Invade and occupy the "oil" countries,thats what Russia,China and North Korea could do together as allies and that would instantly drag the USA and maybe Israel and England into the conflict and as i showed above,the so called "bad guys" would out number the so called "good guys" like 10 to 1 in troop strengths...around 35,000,000 to 4,000,000 actually...Not good at all...
Sounds like your talking about the USA,who exports most or all or its alaskan oil to other countries and then invades the middle east under false pretenses to try and forcibly obtain theirs...
Originally posted by Observor
Originally posted by blocula
Invade and occupy the "oil" countries,thats what Russia,China and North Korea could do together as allies and that would instantly drag the USA and maybe Israel and England into the conflict and as i showed above,the so called "bad guys" would out number the so called "good guys" like 10 to 1 in troop strengths...around 35,000,000 to 4,000,000 actually...Not good at all...
Russia is an oil and gas exporter. China can buy all the oil and gas she needs. Not sure why either of them would be interested in military adventures for something they already have or can so easily obtain.