It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ldyserenity
reply to post by Cassius666
I don't know I apply to these jobs and ask for 10.50 an hour...they have the right to not call me, or they have a right to negotiate, I have the right to tell them to stick their jon too, if they want to pay me too low.
Oh yeah but that's another "leftist" thing, refusing to take crappy pay and waiting until someone actually will pay you what you are worth...
I'd rather have not two pennies to rub together than lower myself to working at Burger King or Taco Bell...I guess I just have an "entitlement" issue.
Originally posted by Cassius666
If the company can give you the option to take minimum wage or go live under a bridge...
Originally posted by UmbraSumus
reply to post by Cassius666
Its an interesting Avatar you have when you consider that this man ...... fired the air traffic controllers on strike in 1981. Believed to be a seminal event for the legal right of private employers.
.........
To your question.
I think that workers need all the leverage they can get in organising the best deal for selling their labour. Corporations have become so behemoth and well resourced...its hardly a level playing field. But trade unions can get a little power hungry and corrupt too given enough time.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Some people would decry that as leftist and what not. How is that leftist? If the company can give you the option to take minimum wage or go live under a bridge, shouldnt workers organize themselves and push for higher wages, by confronting the company with the possibility of bankruptcy?
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Cassius666
If the communists and leftists were truly for the worker, then they'd fight for less taxes taken from the worker.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Cassius666
If the communists and leftists were truly for the worker, then they'd fight for less taxes taken from the worker.
So essentially what you're saying is that when a company willfully provides poor wages to their workers, and poor working conditions, atleast compared to other companies, all for maximizing profit, the blame should solely be put on the government? The worker who is suffering must go and complain to the government? Because the generalization is that it's always the government's fault? Right.
And I suppose, after all those tax cuts, if the business continues treating it's workers poorly, they should continue complaining to the government?
Right.
Originally posted by spinalremain
What union are you affiliated with that you know these leaders and exactly what they want? I'm just curious. You often speak about union this and union that. How much first hand experience do you have?
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
So essentially what you're saying is that when a company willfully provides poor wages to their workers, and poor working conditions, atleast compared to other companies, all for maximizing profit, the blame should solely be put on the government? The worker who is suffering must go and complain to the government? Because the generalization is that it's always the government's fault? Right.
And I suppose, after all those tax cuts, if the business continues treating it's workers poorly, they should continue complaining to the government?
Right.
Originally posted by WTFover
Originally posted by Cassius666
If the company can give you the option to take minimum wage or go live under a bridge...
Maybe, that's the most significant problem. What could workers earn, if there was more competition in wages? Now, the government permits employers to keep wages down, rather than have to compete for quality employees, with competitive wages.
Another problem, obvious to customers, is that minimum wage produces minimum work.
Originally posted by Mikeyy
As it's already been said, Every living example of a communist/Leftest society, has resulted in big goverment, and the loss of personal freedoms.
With Government spending out of control till the point said government simply collapses.
Years ago I got into a fight with a liberal who argued tooth and nail that Communism was the way to go. When I offered the examples of the Soviet Union and China, he just choose to ignore them as not being "true" Communist Societies.
It's very easy to fight and argue your personal veiw with you choose to deny all the facts all day long...
yes Democracy has some serious flaws, but it really beats the hell out of everything else. We seriously need to STOP our goverment from expanding and controlling everything.
Your job at Taco bell wouldnt suck so bad if the government didnt spend us into oblivion and depreciate the dollar so much.
taco bell is a bad example, but say a grocery store. In the 70's working in a grocery store was Considered good money. So much so that in some cases you had to know somebody to get a job there.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
So essentially what you're saying is that when a company willfully provides poor wages to their workers, and poor working conditions, atleast compared to other companies, all for maximizing profit, the blame should solely be put on the government? The worker who is suffering must go and complain to the government? Because the generalization is that it's always the government's fault? Right.
And I suppose, after all those tax cuts, if the business continues treating it's workers poorly, they should continue complaining to the government?
Right.
Where did you get that???
Government takes peoples money. Government should not take peoples money. It's really that simple. Corporations don't actively FORCE people to give them money.
Only government does that.
And. . . .
If you don't like what a company pays you, find another job.
Why cloud the issue?
Originally posted by Mikeyy
Your job at Taco bell wouldnt suck so bad if the government didnt spend us into oblivion and depreciate the dollar so much.
Originally posted by mastahunta
And what of all the people who have to survive in this world with jobs that pay so little?
And why do so many of you friends want to end the tax system which attempts to
make the lack of money more manageable for the average worker?
Most actuaries I have read state that flat taxes will shift the actual cost of society on the workers
even more than the current graduated model.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Cassius666
If the communists and leftists were truly for the worker, then they'd fight for less taxes taken from the worker.
But they aren't. They could give a damn. They want power. They want larger government.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by mastahunta
Then those people need to either live within their means or advance themselves so that they earn more.
What you are ignoring is that this trend of continually lowering the means for the majority
of people is unsustainable. Why can't people demand better wages? Why are you always
for management/elites and the big guy? In every equation you think top down, I see it
consistently with you and your gang. Guess what? You make sure the little guy is earning
well, guess who takes his money anyways? Thats right, the big guy will see an increase in
profit, if the little guy has more to spend each month. Prove that wrong.
Taking money from others who work (taxes) and giving it to people who don't have as much is wealth redistribution.
Making money out of thin air and lending it to people who actually WORK to earn their money is
exactly what constitutes the backbone of this economy, so do talk to me about redistribution.
That is goofy, it like worry about the fire pit and sanctioning the forest fire with your silence.
Really? Making things fair and equal across the board is abhorent to you?
Fair and Equal?
What is fair and equal about getting free money based upon your position and then charging
people compounded interest based upon a title and a large reserve of cash? I am done with
pretending that I don't see this farce for what it is, you are talking as if we are all hanging back
in a Disney Movie. You damn well know this whole this is a scam, but you make believe everything
A ok so long as it benefits the ideas you think are equatable. Look around you man;
This country is about as equal as a bean stock with DDD boobies
I can imagine how some would find paying equally a terrible idea. With the mind-set of many in this day and age, getting something for nothing is more the norm.
Are you talking about bankers? or what?
No... Of course not, you are talking about the people who actually have to stand on their feet and work
yet can't afford to see a fricking doctor when they are sick, even though they work as long or longer than
the banker who does nothing but put this country into further debt and future servitude.
Originally posted by Mikeyy
As it's already been said, Every living example of a communist/Leftest society, has resulted in big goverment, and the loss of personal freedoms.
With Government spending out of control till the point said government simply collapses.
Years ago I got into a fight with a liberal who argued tooth and nail that Communism was the way to go. When I offered the examples of the Soviet Union and China, he just choose to ignore them as not being "true" Communist Societies.
It's very easy to fight and argue your personal veiw with you choose to deny all the facts all day long...
yes Democracy has some serious flaws, but it really beats the hell out of everything else. We seriously need to STOP our goverment from expanding and controlling everything.
Your job at Taco bell wouldnt suck so bad if the government didnt spend us into oblivion and depreciate the dollar so much.
taco bell is a bad example, but say a grocery store. In the 70's working in a grocery store was Considered good money. So much so that in some cases you had to know somebody to get a job there.
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by ldyserenity
reply to post by Cassius666
I don't know I apply to these jobs and ask for 10.50 an hour...they have the right to not call me, or they have a right to negotiate, I have the right to tell them to stick their job too, if they want to pay me too low.
Oh yeah but that's another "leftist" thing, refusing to take crappy pay and waiting until someone actually will pay you what you are worth...
I'd rather have not two pennies to rub together than lower myself to working at Burger King or Taco Bell...I guess I just have an "entitlement" issue.edit on 14-1-2012 by ldyserenity because: holy BEEP gd
Yes, you do. And the first step is admitting you have a problem. Assuming you're unemployed because you refuse to demean yourself by making an honest wage, who's paying for your living expenses? Us. Way to contribute to society.
/TOA