When looking at the realclearpolitics
graph of Republican candidates, it really just boggles my mind how unpredictable voters are. Take a look at this image and just look at how erratic
and inconsistent the candidates are (scroll to the right):
First of all, there was a point where Rick Perry was leading.
This guy is retarded! I don't think he's smart enough to be a first grade teacher, but he was actually leading at one point! But
over time his support has declined and he has fallen.
Then out of nowhere, Herman Cain surged and took the lead. I guess repeating "999" 999 times suddenly made his presidential appeal more attractive or
something. This guy was the chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve, the private, central bank that creates worthless money out of thin air, gives
it to countries all over the world in secrecy, and inflates our currency. It's frightening to think that somebody who worked for the beast itself was
actually leading and had a shot at being president. But just like Perry, his support also declined over time, and luckily that snakeman dropped
That's one thing that I don't understand, how can you support one candidate to be president of the United States, and then one day say "Actually,
nevermind, this guy is better." Shouldn't a few debates, YouTube interviews, and 10 minutes spent reading about their positions online solidify
whether or not you want to vote for them? What are people basing their choices off of if they can change so erratically? The candidate who has the
most positive media coverage? I just don't understand it...
So Perry and Cain had their moments of glory, but they fell and are now far from first place, in fact Cain dropped out after leading at one point. So
in a Republicanesque fashion, another candidate who was not leading took first place: Newt World Order Gingrinch. This Council on Foreign Relations
member was leading the polls. This war mongerer who cheerleads unconstitutional legislation and taking away your freedom in the name of fighting
Al-CIAda terrorists was on top of the pack.
It's almost as if some of the worst people I can imagine are running for president, like this is some sort of sick nightmare. A Federal Reserve
chairman, a New World Order cheerleader who supports insane wars and violations of the Constitution that he swore an oath to uphold, and uh....who was
that third guy?
But Gingrich too has been declining, and sure enough
, there's another jokester who is surging. Rick Santorum, the idiot who compares gay people
to napkins and wants to bomb Iran. Is this what our society has come to? People support any clown who waves an American flag and says "kill brown
people or else our safety will be in jeaporady!"? Are Americans just a bunch of cowards who wet their diapers whenever the thought of people hurting
them is even so much as suggested, even when that's nowhere near grounded in reality? Or are they just that susceptible to war propaganda?
We're seeing a literal repeat of what led us into Iran, almost as if I'm having Deja Vu in this sick nightmare of a reality. We were told that there
was undeniable evidence that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction" by some of the highest elements of our government, and that turned out to be
completely false. So here we are again, no more than 10 years later, and we're being told that Iran is trying to develop "weapons of mass
First of all, why don't we call our thousands of nuclear weapons "weapons of mass destruction"? That dysphemism is pure propaganda. And who are we to
tell another country what they can and can't build, what kind of weapons they can and can't have? We have them, so what makes us better than them? Are
people that arrogant, that they think corrupt politicians who are nothing more than puppets for the Bilderberg Group and the bankers that fund them
have the intelligence and moral highground necessary to police the world?
Well whatever reason it may be, Americans are buying into that garbage, and they're now supporting Santorum. I don't understand where this moron came
from either, he was sitting at the bottom of the pack, being stepped on like the little dog turd he is. But here comes another Republican candidate to
rise in the poll numbers.
Unfortunately Romney has stayed relatively high the whole time. He hasn't had a sharp decline that's kept him at the bottom, even though he is
probably the worst of all. He wants more wars, he doesn't even talk about the Federal Reserve because he's nothing more than a puppet, and his
campaign is being funded by all of the major financial institutions that funded Obama. His campaign donations say it all, we don't even need to look
at his platform, because the peoples agenda that he's there to push is the important thing.
So will Gingrich continue to fall? Will Santorum have his moment of glory where he gets all eyes on him, and gets to spread his hateful message of
killing all brown people who so much as look at him the wrong way while proclaiming himself pro-life, but then fall back down just like Perry and Cain
have? I really, really hope so.
Ron Paul hasn't had any sharp ups and downs, because he doesn't get propped up by the media like all of the other pro-establishment candidates that
have surged have. He sure as hell gets negative media coverage, but his supporters see through the blatant propaganda and agenda being played out.
He's had a steady support base that doesn't even so much as consider voting for a war mongering banker puppet who doesn't talk about the Federal
But he's on the rise, as the subtle yet noticeable increase in his support shows. Maybe people are starting to wake up to his message and are
realizing that all of the other candidates offer the same crap, just seasoned slightly differently. One thing that we do know is that Ron Paul
supporters don't suddenly say "You know what, screw Ron Paul, Mitt Romney is my guy. I change my mind about foreign and monetary policy, let's go to
war and inflate our currency some more!"
Will this become a two-man race between Romney and Paul as Gingrich continues to fall, and Santorum plummets back down to the bottom where he belongs?
Pro-establishment vs anti-establishment? I sure hope that's the case. Giving Americans a choice between freedom and tyranny, war vs peace, monetary
debt enslavement or sound money, a corrupt banker puppet or an uncorruptable man whose dedication is to the people and the COnstitution will hopefully
wake them up.
edit on 14-1-2012 by TupacShakur because: (no reason given)