Are you for or against Americans jobs being outsourced?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 14-1-2012 @ 04:27 PM by ldyserenity
reply to post by Diablos



This ought to be interesting.There are so many here at ATS that would gladly bend over and kiss the "Godly" corporation's posteriors, dunno if they're really shills, but they're definately neo facists...and love bending over and taking it in the posterior that this ought to be a truly funny thread by the time it grows...
As for me, totally against it you want to outsource, that's fine, then call yourself a Indian/chinese/mexican/african company, don't call yourself American, because what they do is about as unamerican as it gets!


reply posted on 14-1-2012 @ 05:03 PM by SurrealisticPillow
Outsourcing is not necessarily a bad thing, but when it is rampant it is a sign of unhealthy imbalances in the international market.
The problem with these sort of questions is that the answer can only be as simple as the question, when the problems actually run much deeper. The real question is, what sorts of policies create the financial incentives to outsource? Why is it profitable? Why would it be necessary for survival in a competitive market?
The answer in a nutshell is that a global economy was shoved down our throats. This global economy only benefits the biggest corporations under the current trade agreements.
First, no American business should have to compete with a foreign business that DOESN'T MEET U.S. LABOR STANDARDS.
Period.
This alone would solve a lot. You simply ban the import of those goods until said country has fair labor standards meaning a living wage, standardized hours and working conditions.
Secondly, you have to actually regulate Wall Street brokerage firms and investment banks. They have the financial tools whereby ruthless CEO's and CFO's can mortgage the future of the business for big time cash today, putting the business under serious debt. This makes the business unable to compete, and these criminals get rich in the process. LBO's, leveraged buyouts. # can these "options", they should be criminal.
Lastly, get educated. Everyone. This crap will not end until we know HOW, WHY, WHEN and by WHOM we are getting screwed. Until then, just keep bending over.


reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 03:21 PM by syrinx high priest
reply to post by Animal



if a foreing nation passsed laws making it illegal for them to send jobs to the US, how would the US respond ?

simple logic actually


reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 07:42 PM by Diablos
Originally posted by nuttin4U
Let me laugh for a second... Ok...now that i've gotten that out of the way...let me just say: "Your j.o.b.s.? How so? Are you the owner of Nike, Sharp, Chevy, etc, etc...so on, and so forth? So, how can you say YOUR, anything? You are just an EMPLOYEE. Your EMPLOYER doesn't have to be loyal to you; your EMPLOYER has to be loyal to his/her BUSINESS because, if they don't, they also will be UNemployed.

No one is saying that an employer shouldn't have the right to outsource, but if they want to take advantage of the extremely low overhead costs then they should keep all of their business there. By the time all of these companies outsource their jobs, Americans won't even be able to afford their products at the reduced cost. No American is willing to design a commercial jet plane at rates as low as 2 dollars/day. Every other developed country uses tariffs to protect the jobs of its citizenry.

Originally posted by nuttin4UNow, let's say you have a business...and Joe Schmoe wants $5 an hour, for his services, but Jack Wong will take $4 dollars for his services, who are you going to hire? Well, that's what has happened in America. Joe Schmoe is too EXPENSIVE to keep, when Jack Wong will do it for less the price. That's called SMART BUSINESS. It's "nothing personal", it's just BUSINESS.

Yet, Joe Scmoe most likely has among the best education in the world, while Jack Wong has probably paid his way through school and examinations (rampant in China, many engineers do not even take exams and have family/friends pull strings for them to get out). With no labor regulations or benefits, companies will always take Jack Wong because he is willing to work in a very hazardous and unregulated work area with no benefits. China has also been unfairly manipulating its currency.

There is a reason why American products last 3-5 times as longer than Chinese ones. When you can buy yourself an engineering degree in China, it says something. Greedy employers couldn't careless though because they can hire 100 Chinese engineers on the same budget that an American engineer would be charging. This will only bite them in rear eventually when Americans can no longer afford to even buy basic necessities due to being unemployed let alone their cheap quality products.



reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 08:43 PM by Animal
reply to post by syrinx high priest



Hello again syrinx.

As Diablos pointed out I said nothing about passing laws preventing corporations from manufacturing goods over seas and sending those goods to the USA - or as you put it, making it illegal to send jobs to another country.

What I am talking about is the type of economic policies we had in place up until about 30 years ago when president after president, both republican and democrat, forged policy in favor of globalization - or a global economy.

Or of a sane tariff structure such as those during the industrial revolution - 20% to 44% - a time period where this country (usa) saw unprecedented growth in wealth and quality of life, link.

By ending our requirement to participate in global trade treaties and by increasing the tariff on imported goods and services we would begin to see jobs and industry begin to develop on US soil once again.

What I support is US policies that protect the US. I think globally people are coming to realize the globalization experiment has failed the people and benefited the global corporations.

Our monetary system is already essentially set up to extract resources (wealth) from the lower strata of society and carry them to the top strata (money created by the top strata, to be lent at interest, to the lower strata). Adding globalization into the mix simply exponentially increases this movement of wealth - from the bottom to the top.

My 00.02.

edit on 15-1-2012 by Animal because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 08:56 PM by madhatr137
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reply to
post by Animal



if a foreing nation passsed laws making it illegal for them to send jobs to the US, how would the US respond ?

simple logic actually


American politicians would react with faux-anger, making speeches about how evil whatever nation was making such laws was and how it was detrimental to all the hardworking Americans that need those jobs; but really, they'd be laughing when the cameras turned off because what they know is that nation can make rules like that anymore...because in a globalised economy, nations no longer make the rules.
edit on 15/1/12 by madhatr137 because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 3 days ago with 36 member flags
Bill C-38 protest has 13,000 websites going dark
  Posted 1 days ago with 26 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 4 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 15 days ago with 3 member flags