The search for life evidence on Mars., page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 14-1-2012 @ 02:25 PM by Char-Lee
reply to post by arianna


That is the thing, we can't tell for sure. Things here on earth many times look artificial and are not. Unless we have someone to pick it up and look how will we ever be sure? we could speculate forever.

Personally i am of the opinion that yes there are many many artificial structures on Mars and there is life forms still there now both plant and animal and maybe intelligent also.


reply posted on 14-1-2012 @ 09:11 PM by Chamberf=6
reply to post by arianna





Do you have any opinions about the objects showing in the view?


Rocks, weathered rocks, and shadows.


reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 07:59 AM by VonDoomen
reply to post by LonelyGuy



Nasa stated that it was not fossilized martian microbes.

I have a thread pertaining to life on mars and even emailed noted nasa scientist chris mckay.
He replied that nasa has no proof of current or even past life on mars.

did nasa just admit to extraterrestrial life?



email from mckay:



(name witheld) this a misquote (or I messed up). Here is what I think:
1. We have direct evidence of fluvial features on Mars.
2. These strongly imply the stable flow of liquid water on the surface for extended periods of time early in Mars' history.
3. It seems to us that for liquid water to flow the pressure must have been higher. maybe 100x the present.
4. We also surmise that the temperature might have been higher too. Maybe as warm as -10C average. (today is -60C).
5. Together these suggest that life may have been possible.
6. When we look at the history of life on Earth we see evidence for life very early in the fossil record. So even a short window of habitability on Mars may have been enough for life to get started. Hope this clarifies things -Chris
edit on 1/15/2012 by VonDoomen because: (no reason given)
edit on 1/15/2012 by VonDoomen because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 08:30 AM by Blister
Hi ArMap, yeah I'll come back to you on that. Will need some detail to explain it...

Just dropped back for a sec to give an interesting post at
hirise.lpl.arizona.edu...

Here is a sub-sample of the main pic:



The location of the sample can be found here:



Zooming in we can see a very strange thing:


Closer:



Make of the pic/s what you will. The original orientation has been preserved. The scene is what can only be described as an extremely steep slope (bottom is down the slope).

ArMap I will catch-up tommorrow about that. (3.30am here)

edit on 15-1-2012 by Blister because: correct address




reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 08:59 AM by VonDoomen
reply to post by Blister



that looks like a dark hole. Just like the countless other ones I can see in this photo. Theres no smoothness to it or anything about it that makes it look artificial.

Why do you focus on this dark spot versus the other ones? Im curious cause i just dont see anything out of the ordinary here.


reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 10:08 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by Blister



To me, it looks like a shadow, all shadows point in that direction.


reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 02:57 PM by Frira
reply to post by arianna



Left to right from top left:

* Cow patty
* Armadillo looking out from his burrow.
* A rock
* Nothing at all-- just soil
* Young Juniper
* Probably another cow patty

Lower left to right:

* sand and wind eroded rock.
* air scoop from a broken model airplane.

Wait a minute-- that's not Mars-- that's the view out my back window!

edit on 15-1-2012 by Frira because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-1-2012 @ 09:29 PM by paperface
reply to post by Blister



Facinating picture,all the humanoids on Mars are very different,this one posted a few weeks ago was also an intriquing subject.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 15-1-2012 by paperface because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-1-2012 @ 03:11 AM by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by LonelyGuy



Try again. There is no conclusive proof evidence of life was found, it is easilly explained without life being needed and life was not even a likely culprit. We took notice, it was interesting, but certainly was not proof and was far more likely to not be due to life.
Edit: Others already beat me to it.
edit on 17-1-2012 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^