It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You're following the Christ, an alleged man who lived, but there is no archeological evidence to support his existence.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Jesus was not recording a movie, events in history aren't usually recorded until AFTER the event has happened.
You seem to have a very poor understanding of history...
And Vlad the Impaler was 1400 years after Jesus, hardly something you can use for your argument.
Originally posted by Ravenheart
reply to post by FugitiveSoul
Tiberius Caesar existed parallel to Jesus. However, why would he write about Jesus while he lived? Especially if he had nothing to prove if the man clearly existed before his eyes. I for one don't follow my friends and co-workers around writing about their life just in case they die and for some odd reason a historian needed a burden of proof that unequivocally proved their existence.
Keep in mind, there were no digitized obituaries of the time period to keep a record of deaths like we have today. Everything was written. There were no notebooks to carry around, they had large parchment or papyrus. Not exactly convenient for travel. Even if his disciples wanted to follow Jesus around and document his life it would have been a pretty difficult task. Also, even if Tiberius did not account for Jesus' life until after death, why write about this man at all, especially being a secularist? Tiberius was not a Christian and was a Caesar. What did he have to gain, speculation aside?
Your friends and co-workers don't walk around claiming to be the son of god. If they did, I'm sure it would show up on your facebook status. Don't give me the "difficult to document" argument. By then the Jews already had their bible, writing wasn't as exotic as people would have you believe. Scribes traveling around with the romans was common place. These guys followed around the emperor and/or armies writing everything they saw. This is another reason I'm skeptical. The Romans wrote about everything. EVERYTHING. Why wouldn't they have detailed accounts of Christ, his trial, death, and especially the after party spectacle?
I won't argue with you there, if my co-worker was walking around claiming to be God and healing the blind. I would probably write about it. However, the first leg of the Christ journey did have access to scribes as the Roman military did, but Tiberius Caesar was an emperor of Rome whom had 10 authors all accounting for the life, death, and miracles of Christ. Do these not count for "The Romans" that wrote about everything? And their names were; Josephus, Tacitus, Suetonius, Seneca, Paterculus, Plutarch, Pliny the Elder, Strabo, Valerius Maximum. I took out Luke to provide further proof from a secular point of view.
Originally posted by Ravenheart
reply to post by FugitiveSoul
It would be awesome to sit down and talk to you about these things over coffee, but this is the internet. I'm not really an internet forums kind of person, but I was compelled to jump on this forum. I'm an artist at a game studio and I'm between assignments, but work is catching up to me and I don't think I'll be able to provide the educated responses your questions need. Which sucks. But, this is a great website with sources and proper citations that might answer a lot of your questions. (I Hope) But I wanted to say thanks for being respectful, and I wish you blessings in your search for truth.
CARM | Mithra prove Christianity False?edit on 18-1-2012 by Ravenheart because: typo
Coming from the guy who thinks Noah and the family gave birth to every race on the planet. Okayyyyy.
Someone writing a lot of stories about a guy, 2000 years ago or 600 years ago makes no difference. Vlad did some note worthy stuff. People wrote about it. People blog about Criss Angel and his feats are mere mortal parlor tricks. People wrote about the adventures of Jesse James during his life.
People put up graffiti on the walls of ancient Rome talking about the battle of Gladiators, yet no one felt the need to put up a sketch or jot something down about Jesus, the miracle man? I don't buy it.
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
The problem that you and many others have is, you believe that if someone "understands" the bible, that there is no way they would be able to be anything but a Christian, and that's just not the case. We do understand the bible. We just don't agree with it. We may agree with the moral teachings, but that doen't mean we have to accept Christ, or the stories portrayed by the authors of the bible as literal truth. As I've said, these morals have existed for thousands upon thousands of years, and they are endemic to civilization, and just because Christ adopted these ideas, doesn't make them Christian.
edit on 18-1-2012 by FugitiveSoul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Yes I trust the Word of God. Unless you can prove that we are not descendants of Noah why should anyone listen to you?
1600 years ago makes a huge difference. Even so there is still probably more evidence for Jesus Christ then there is for Vlad the Impaler. Although I am not denying Vlad existed.
How do you know they didn't?
Originally posted by sacgamer25
Following the Moral teaching of Christ is the only true requirement for me to call you brother. Although I still hold to the faith that God has more to show you if you would believe that Jesus is THE Son of God. Not just a son of God. With love and prayer for you and for all.
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
"Don't hate christians because of what religion has done"? Isn't that like saying "don't hate the player, hate the game?" What a cop out.
Christianity has a lot to answer for. Should christians be held accountable for that? 50/50. Perhaps if christians today make more of an effort to be less like the narrow minded power hungry christians that were responsible for the Cruisades, than other people might treat them with less disdain. What you put out there is what you get back and I've seen christians do some very petty, evil, nasty, hateful, vindictive stuff. In the name of god no less.
People did that. Christian people both as individuals and religeous zealots. 50/50.
Being willing to die on the cross, proving both that he loved the father enough to be subject to crucifixion and also that he loved his enemy enough to forgive them on the cross. This kind of love is perfect, a love that all of us should aspire to but one that none of us are likely to perfect.
. . .those who preach against the law would be "lowest in the kingdom of heaven"
You seem to have a very poor understanding of history..