It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran: We have proof US behind assassination

page: 14
36
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 08:26 AM
link   
While we wait for SAVAMA to cook up their evidence, I thought I'd post this interesting tidbit from the estimable Presstv:


On November 29, 2010, Shahriari and Fereydoun Abbasi were targeted by terrorist attacks; Shahriari was killed immediately but Dr. Abbasi, the current director of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, only sustained injuries.

Iran says as the UN Resolution 1747, adopted against Tehran in March 2007, cited Abbasi's name as a "nuclear scientist," the perpetrators were in a position to trace their victim.


www.presstv.ir...

Someone doesn't want Iranian scientists talking to the IAEA, especially if it results in further sanctions.




posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   
I really hope the US and Iran don't come to blows. I don't want to see 5.00 a gallon gas...



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 08:53 AM
link   
reply to post by travis911
 


Going to be more then that, and here in Canada 5/gal gas isn't anything new.



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 09:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by travis911
I really hope the US and Iran don't come to blows. I don't want to see 5.00 a gallon gas...


The hell with the price hike in fuel. I don't want to see millions of men, women and children dead in a seconds moment when Israel and the US start in with their Nukes!!



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 10:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by daaskapital

Iran: We have proof US behind assassination


www.ynetnews.com

Iranian officials claim Tehran obtained credible documents providing conclusive evidence of CIA involvement in murder of nuclear scientist

...

According to an Iranian statement broadcasted on the Islamic Republic's official TV Channel, Tehran has conclusive evidence that the United States plotted the assassination of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan last week.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said his country has obtained "credible documents that prove the terror attack was planned
(visit the link for the full news article)

I know we're not supposed to make one line posts, but after reading all this... It comes to mind to ask that very dangerous question... So What?





posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 11:10 AM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 


Ok...fine...have it your way.



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 12:20 PM
link   
I think it's time for ATS to make a category just for Iran related events...

I still believe that it was Mossad who did this attack, but I'm not surprised to see Iran pointing their fingers at USA.....



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 12:27 PM
link   
reply to post by travis911
 
5.00? try 8 to15$ a gal 8 for unleaded and 15 for diesel. This would be an air/ navy war, they use more fuel than ground troops.



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 12:38 PM
link   
reply to post by jhn7537
 
yea well they did it to day as seen here they also say Britain was in on it www.cnn.com...

Iran will hold "the U.S., Britain and the Zionist regime accountable for their actions," said the deputy chairman of Iran's Joint Chiefs of Staff, Brig. Gen. Massoud Jazayeri.

Jazayeri said the assassination would not hinder Iran's progress towards strategic technologies, the government-run Press TV reported Sunday, following an interview with him on Saturday.
does any one see the give away to the inside job? no read this then think

Jazayeri said the assassination would not hinder Iran's progress towards strategic technologies, the government-run Press TV reported Sunday
still think it was not a blame game on the US Israel? or was it a CIA MOSSAD and SAS? if we did do it would we not target one to make major set backs , and delay there plan by oh say 5 to 10 years if not longer? and why the weak tone

said the assassination would not hinder Iran's progress towards strategic technologies
would not stronger words convey the message?



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by travis911
 
5.00? try 8 to15$ a gal 8 for unleaded and 15 for diesel. This would be an air/ navy war, they use more fuel than ground troops.



Thank god I can work out of my home office the majority of the time
......If I still had to drive 150 miles (to and from work) every day, I would be a very angry man...



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by jhn7537
 
you fail to see the big picture , the truck that delivers food to the store that you get your food from needs fuel so who pays for this , you and me is this way of rising food prices and other goods that are delivered.



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Here in the UK we are already paying £6.50 + a gallon, so in Dollars that must be $10.00. You Americans don't know how good you still got it!



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 01:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by jhn7537
 
you fail to see the big picture , the truck that delivers food to the store that you get your food from needs fuel so who pays for this , you and me is this way of rising food prices and other goods that are delivered.



Yea, I see your point, a rise in gas prices affects practically everything in the world.....But I am thankful that I dont have to spend a considerable amount on my own personal gas use....



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 01:07 PM
link   
Then WHY dont they release the damn proof! It would only look good on them if they did and heck they might gain some credibility. Now they just look like idiots.



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 01:07 PM
link   
Forgive me if this theory based already been mentioned ...we know the CIA are always knee deep in dung wherever conflict and social unrest is.......CIA> helping Iran to develope nuclear // other weapons> scientist starts feeling morally bankrupt n guilty> begins to crack> CIA whacks him out and leaves "evidence" that points to other government entity..spec.ops. state dept..etc... after all CIA is a for profit corporation reg. In delaware



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 01:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by PhantomPlague
Forgive me if this theory based already been mentioned ...we know the CIA are always knee deep in dung wherever conflict and social unrest is.......CIA> helping Iran to develope nuclear // other weapons> scientist starts feeling morally bankrupt n guilty> begins to crack> CIA whacks him out and leaves "evidence" that points to other government entity..spec.ops. state dept..etc... after all CIA is a for profit corporation reg. In delaware


Why are you guys making this so complex?
This is asymmetrical warfare implemented on IRAN.
Its that simple.

They have been assassinating generals and other scientists, attacking bases, and leaders for the last couple of years. Not to forget sanctions. They are trying to provoke IRAN to strike back so they can have an excuse to use the death of a few American soldiers for a full scale attack.


According to Professor Francis Boyle with reference to the ongoing showdown between the US Navy and Iran in the Persian Gulf:: “Once again, it looks to me like what FDR did in 1941 when he sacrificed the Pacific Fleet and its men at Pearl Harbor—except for the carriers—in order to get the USA into World War II despite the fervent desire of the American People and Congress to stay out. Déjà vu all over again. Back to the Future ” (Francis Boyle, January 13, 2011, email communication to author)



Only the blind do not see that the US government is preparing to attack Iran. According to Professor Michel Chossudovsky, “Active war preparations directed against Iran (with the involvement of Israel and NATO) were initiated in May 2003.”



Military Deployment
Iran is the target of US-Israel-NATO war plans.
Advanced weapons systems have been deployed.
US and allied Special Forces as well as intelligence operatives are already on the ground inside Iran. US military drones are involved in spying and reconnaissance activities.
Bunker buster B61 tactical nuclear weapons are slated to be used against Iran in retaliation for its alleged nuclear weapons program. Ironically, in the words of US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Iran does not possess a nuclear weapons program. “Are they trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No.”
The risk of armed hostilities between the US-Israel led coalition and Iran is, according to Israeli military analysts “dangerously close”.



A third factor is to deter or slow China’s rise as a military and economic power by controlling China’s access to energy. It was China’s oil investments in eastern Libya that led to the sudden move against Libya by the US and its NATO puppets, and it is China’s oil investments elsewhere in Africa that resulted in the Bush regime’s creation of the United States Africa Command, designed to counter China’s economic influence with US military influence. China has significant energy investments in Iran, and a substantial percentage of China’s oil imports are from Iran. Depriving China of independent access to oil is Washington’s way of restraining and boxing in China.



www.prisonplanet.com...’s-agenda-politics.html
www.prisonplanet.com...



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 02:11 PM
link   
Yeah I am with Iran on this one. Down with the CIA! I can't believe how long these shadow governments have been allowed to murder and steal from the entire world. I am an American, but those people are not my leaders and they are going down.



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 02:42 PM
link   
I honestly would prefer the United States to deal with the issues going on at our border dealing with the Mexican cartels before getting involved in another war in the middle east...If anything, I feel that the cartels are a more immidiate threat to the United States...



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by jhn7537
I honestly would prefer the United States to deal with the issues going on at our border dealing with the Mexican cartels before getting involved in another war in the middle east...If anything, I feel that the cartels are a more immidiate threat to the United States...



Ah what you don't get is. The USA is a threat to the USA and the rest of the world! Because the butthead puppet presidents are doing a Thunderbirds thing and doing what they are told by the Paedophile masters..... The Zionists.

And if any American thinks that they are voting in their favourite candidate for presidency then they are very STUPID and or mind controlled!!



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 04:06 PM
link   
reply to post by superman2012
 


I just sat down, and will give you a detailed response on how I feel the US was forced into being the global police. You wont like it, since it was morals that forced us to be what we have become.

I was actually feeling as though you might be able to enlighten me on some things. I did think.... "So many people have this same opinion of the US, maybe this guy can lay it out for me"


Then you decided to say that there are several countries that could give the US a run for it's money. You just showed your true colors there my friend.

There is NOT ONE single country on this planet, that could do more than defend themselves against a ground invasion by the US. NOT ONE single country could project power clear to our border. To say otherwise is a blatant lie. FACT!

Could they defend themselves, making a ground invasion impossible? Of course.... Could they defeat the US in a war, absolutely not!




top topics



 
36
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join