I want you to do this little "experiment". Don't worry, it's not something you can't do. I think that, even 11-year old kid could do this "experiment".

Take a glass and fill it halfway with water. Then put a few ice cubes in it. Put a line on the glass where is the water level. Leave it to for a few minutes, so the ice cubes you put in the glass can melt. And then see what happened. The water level remained the same, or it raised for a little bit.

Why did i ask you to do this "experiment"?
Because the so-called scientists who are working under the control of elites, want us to believe that if ice on the south and north melt, the ocean level will raise for 100m!
The ice is made of water, but it's also made from air, and since 75% of iceberg are under water, the conclusion is clear.
There is ice and snow on the island, but the same rule applies. Snow thickness 10m produce only 1m of water, maybe less.
There is no chance that the see level could raise for 100m, even if all ice and snow on the world melt!
If see level raises for 100m, more than 90% of the land would be under water.
But this so-called scientist are saying that, if see level rises for 100m only coastal towns would be flooded.

This is my little contribution to the truth!
If I missed the right section, please mods, be free the move it to the one.

Do you know how much ice and snow are on the poles? Have you done the math to see how many gallons of water that would be? If you don't know that, then you can't say for sure that it won't.
Edit: also, you are assuming that all of the frozen water in the world is floating in the ocean, which it isnt. See: glaciers

I understand your thoughts about ice that is already in the ocean, but there is a great deal of ice that is not, it is on land, and when that melts, it very well may raise the level of the ocean.

If there is global warming, I don't believe it is something done by man, but by the sun. Just my six cents (adjusted for inflation).

Sorry but I think your wrong.

All of the ice above water level would add to the water. Therefore making it higher. Your icecube test is of cubes that only sit a tiny bit higher than water level when floating.

I-used-scotch-whiskey-instead-of-water-and-by-the-time-the-ice-melted-the-glass-was-empty
Tried-a-few-more-times-but-the-result-was-the-same.
The-moral-of-the-story---there-is-nothing-you-and-i-can-do-about-it-except-enjoy-our-time-here-before-Waterworld

(i-think-you-should-try-this-experiment-with-salt-water-for-a-more-accurate-result)

There is ice and snow on the island, but the same rule applies. Snow thickness 10m produce only 1m of water, maybe less.

And every thought is welcome!

What about the ice that melts on land? Not all ice is floating ice - Glaciers

Well-I'll-have-to-agree-with-12Volts-on-this-one-for-some-strange-reason-his-post-grabbed-my-attention-the-most

Global-warming-is-real-its-just-the-amount-man-is-contributing-to-the-factor-is-not-worth-mentioning.
Sea-levels-have-been-rising-pretty-fast-over-the-past-decade-and-in-the-next-20-to-30-years-its-predicted-to-rise-7-meters-globally...sht that was hard

I'm doing this right now while drinking my Kool Aid.

Neat little experiement to try. While I don't think the sea level would rise as much as many are prediciting, I don't think it will rise so little as what you are saying. I think it would be somewhere in middle ground. And to the person who said they were throwing in their six cents - for inflation...

You have made my day.