It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sandman80
perhaps people should look into Susan Lindauer's account on how vans were coming into the WTC garages in the middle of the night for a week and a half prior to 9/11.
Lindauer was found mentally unfit to stand trial in two separate hearings
Originally posted by Sandman80
Taking into account other fires in skyscrapers and even planes crashing into them... no other buildings have collapsed. Let alone two in one day and a third... that wasn't even struck by a plane... yet these buildings, two of which were designed to take 'such impact' go down...
And the numerous independent reports that have led many to believe nano-thermite was found amidst the dust and wreckage... this would be the so called "evidence suggesting such" maybe?
Or is it that you would need an official government agency or investigation to state such?
Well, if 9/11 "was" an inside job... one might assume that such government agency or investigation would never work in a conflicting manner. IF it was an inside job, don't you think they would do EVERYTHING in their power to make sure it stays that way.
Think for yourself. Ask questions. Question authority.
15). Posting: You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.
Originally posted by pteridine
How do you know how buildings constructed like the WTC buildings would collapse?
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by Sandman80
perhaps people should look into Susan Lindauer's account on how vans were coming into the WTC garages in the middle of the night for a week and a half prior to 9/11.
Why should anyone believe a mentally unfit person making stories up?
Lindauer was found mentally unfit to stand trial in two separate hearings
www.washingtonpost.com...
www.seattlepi.com...
www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by pteridine
Taking into account skyscrapers constructed like the WTC that have had large planes crash into them at high speed and burned we have two collapses.
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by spoor
You're a liar. I just checked all of those pages, and not one mentioned WTC7. In fact, the report ends on page 567, and you said 570.
Spoor is a confirmed liar who knowingly spreads disinformation...
Originally posted by Sek82
Confirmed indeed, looked through the report myself and very surprisingly, WTC 7 is not mentioned at all in the 9/11 Commission Report,
Originally posted by TupacShakur
Do you really think I'm that stupid?
Originally posted by TupacShakur
But yes I see that WTC7 is indeed mentioned in the report.
Originally posted by pteridine
....
If this was an "inside job" as you say how do you think it would be done? Have you ever planned a miltary operation? The first principal is to minimize moving parts and keep things simple at each step. Make sure the plan can't be tracked back to you. Involve as few people as possible.
Here's how it would have been planned:
1. Allow the hijackers to think it was their idea.
2. Allow the hijackers to train as pilots.
3. Allow the hijackers to get to the plane.
4. Make sure no air marshalls were on the planes.
5. Allow the planes to hit targets.
6. Stand back and let things happen.
The complicated Rube Goldberg plots are just for entertainment and minor bilkings of a few suckers who really need a conspiracy. No planner would have put explosives in the buildings because explosions are obvious and wiring 100+ stories would have far too many risks of discovery.
Get smart. Think for yourself. Ask questions. Question the truther sites.
.
Yeah WTC7 wasn't even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. Is one of the only three skyscrapers to collapse from fire damage in history collapsing not important or something? It didn't get hit by a plane or anything, but whatever, they just felt that it wasn't worth mentioning.