Well, since my question didn't get answered, could someone post up the pic that Standing said he'd give us here at ATS to look at?
I'm a photographer, so, I'm all about the pictures.
I think it's it's pretty thin gruel if he's only giving one pic for us to analyze.
Why so miserly?
If he's got pictures, why not post them all? What's there to hide?
When I do nature shoots, I come away with hundreds of frames of material. If I run into something fleeting, something rare, something exceptional, I
machine-gun the hell out of it for dozens and dozens of frames.
Here, this guy only has a few still photos to offer?
He said he has a Canon 60D. I'm a Canon guy. 60D is good camera. It's not 1D, or 5D, but, it'll get the job done and do so quite well.
If all he's got to offer for examination is one thin frame, I find this suspect.
I thought it was a bit dodgy when he deflected interest in taking an experienced ATS member out on an expedition by stating that they're not taking
skeptics out anymore.
I'll be keen to see if anything ever develops from lab analysis of scat, or, if that ever even happens.
All in all, Standing talks a good game, but, I've yet to see any pudding to find proof in.
Fun interview. Thanks ATS Live!
edit on 14-1-2012 by nineix because: (no reason given)