reply to post by Ookie
It does make a lot of sense when you are working for Walt Disney and want to continue to capitalise on Mickey Mouse. This has been one of the main
lobbies that have continue to extend the coverage period of copyright.
I do agree that IP and copyright terms are a bit of mess these days with lawyers in this field some of the best paid. I do consider it reasonable that
an inventor does get a chance to capitalise on their investments. There are many different time periods depending on the product from about 3 years
for drugs to 70 years past the death of the creator for art works.
I do acknowledge that money is important, but when it is said that this is the only reason we do something it is producing some very negative
consequence, like war for example. Generally most of us do work to try and improve our world in some way. Until a more accurate picture of the
motivations and why we do what we do is developed, the IP scene will continue to be a mess.