posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:47 AM
(Sorry if this is the wrong forum, mods)
If Mitt wins the nominee they might have to make Rand his vp just so they can capture the Ron Paul voters and independents.
This statement happened on a discussion earlier today and it got me thinking. I'd want others to talk on it on their own opinion.
In my opinion, I never thought of it, but it makes damn good sense.
It's just so unusual of a thought though. I mean, has Ron Paul attacked Romney that much? I forget. And it's turning out that Rand Paul is making
his move for 2016, as Ron will be retiring after this. And Ron himself is a bit too old to be more than a party moderator, though I would live it if
Thing is, the neocons are dying. So....Is Romney a Neocon? I'm not so sure if the public neocons are attacking him. Are his nefarious backers all
that cut off from the idea however?
A Romney-Rand band would just about propel enough force to win.
But it's so strange. The union of liberty and corporate hegemony. I almost don't want to think it possible, but if Romney wants to win, does he
really have any other choice? Can he hope to gain much beyond 40% of the vote without the Paul followers behind him?
This is strange. And personally I don't think it's out of the question, but just that. Strange. It sort of just throws everything up in the air.
I think this is the only possible way for the republicans to win, otherwise Rand will likely run in 2016 and that will really be a game changer for
Anyway, enough from me. Thoughts?