If someone has noticed odd trails in the sky and their search for answers has brought them here, they have come to a place where they can see active
debate by both sides of the argument, which is what anyone seeking answers would want of course.
However, in my personal opinion and experience, Their initial state of 'not knowing' is exactly what the Chemtrail trollers (those who repeat the
same false claims over and over, despite having things explained to them personally and them never having refuted any of it) rely on. They seem to
descend like moths to a flame to try and indoctrinate the unwary.
The average lay person, with no direct interest in aviation, cannot be expected to know much about air routes and traffic frequency, neither are they
going to pay too much attention to what happens higher up in the atmosphere beyond what affects us directly, such as is it raining etc. They can
realistically be expected to know even less about changes in aircraft fleets and engine types, that is definitely the area of expertise for
professionals and geeks.
Therefore it is of little surprise that noticing a big, loitering 'X' shape, or other,in the sky appears strange and raises questions. They search the
net, finding, or even looking for, Chemtrail discussions and wander in like a baby deer into a field full of Lions.
I find those who then swoop, professing to know with absolute certainty that this is caused by a mysterious and secret spraying operation by persons
unknown for reasons unknown (yes, absolute certainty). That this has been going on for years, that this is proven merely by the fact the trail is
there and no other physical evidence is needed, to be, at the very least, mischievously dishonest.
Their dishonesty is compounded when known fake evidence is presented, only to be debunked for the umpteenth time. I remember one person defending such
an action, in all seriousness, by claiming that even if it is fake, it only illustrates the point!
When they then try to validate their own fantasy theories by attacking fellow members who are actually professionals in the field and trying to
discredit their perfectly sound explanations with wild accusations of being paid agents etc, they take on a much more sinister look.
It must surely, by now, be abundantly clear that anyone who has regularly contributed to this board over a time that STILL uses the "contrails don't
persist" line are deliberately trolling. Even the Chemtrailers-in-chief are now accepting that trying to deny that contrails exist just makes their
position look stupid, but some on here still cling to it.
Likewise we see mention of the Northrop B-2 and it's "anti contrail" tanks, deliberate trolling. It has been discussed in full on here, we know it
DIDN'T WORK and so the detector system that tells the crew when to reduce altitude so as to remain visually stealthy when they are on an operational
mission was introduced instead. No link to chemtrails AT ALL. This is just one example of misrepresentation of known facts, see also the roping in of
water bombers and cloud seeding to try and nail this flimsy story into some kind of solidity.
Then there is the magical power to look up and know a Chemtrail from a contrail, or the temperature and humidity 6 miles up or the height and speed of
disparate aircraft, all from the eyeball. Deliberate trolling, or utter stupidity? It's got to be one of em.
There have even been posts/threads on here calling for anyone who doesn't believe the Chemtrail hoax to LEAVE the forum! Someone obviously doesn't
want anyone making their own mind up from reading both sides, why would that be?
What is the motto here? "if the facts aren't there, make some up"?
Anyone questioning something they don't understand or are concerned about is one thing, and it's a good thing.
BUT those select few on here that choose to ignore true facts, choose to dismiss credible sources and choose to attack anyone trying to pass on some
background knowledge (as opposed to theory) and attempt to discredit them through ridicule would appear to have a much more sinister and evil
They seem to WANT people to worry and fret about something that isn't even there, and that is quite different from "truth seeking". What for?
Still, all anyone can do is read both sides of the debate with an open mind and decide for yourself. That's how I first came to this board and I
remain here to share what I know, and to see if something g solid and credible does emerge, never say never.
edit on 13-1-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)