Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha

Originally posted by Starchild23

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha
Anti-Whites still won't take the anti-White challenge. This is........hmmmm i have lost count.......the EIGHTH time i have asked this. Here it is again:

Do you agree that all races. Be it Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, or Whites in Europe, have an equal right to ensure the survival of their own race and cultures in their own countries?

I'll add another for the hell of it:

Why do anti-White think White children are just expendable assets to be sacrificed at the alter of "multiculturalism?"

Remember folks the anti-White mantra of "Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for EVERYONE" is simply genocide. Its a crime and justifying and denying it implicate anti-Whites.

I think the white countries for everyone thing is because whites are the only ones who don't regard foreigners as potential terrorists...or at least try not to. And of course not every race has an entirely equal chance...but that does not mean we have to support racism.

You can think what you like but you are either brain washed with PC, a cultural Marxist or being disingenuous.

Whites in EVERY single White nation on this earth are being brow beaten into accepting this. There has been no voting on this, no voting is allowed to stop this, every poll suggests the majority of White people want immigration to stop and if anyone speaks out against it they are smeared and shouted down with Marxist control words called a "nazithatwantstokillsixmillionjews" and are in risk of losing their job, publicly smeared by the media or thrown in jail. That is JUST like the Soviet Union. We live under second generation communism.

Its INCREDIBLE people on a NWO/Conspiracy site haven't worked this one out.

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White.

I repeat: YOU - ARE - RACIST

Why? Because nothing in what I said supported racism, and yet you are accusing me of being racist. Psychology states that you, in turn, must be racially discriminatory.

I don't talk to racists. Have a good day.

Originally posted by Starchild23

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha

Originally posted by Starchild23

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha
Anti-Whites still won't take the anti-White challenge. This is........hmmmm i have lost count.......the EIGHTH time i have asked this. Here it is again:

Do you agree that all races. Be it Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, or Whites in Europe, have an equal right to ensure the survival of their own race and cultures in their own countries?

I'll add another for the hell of it:

Why do anti-White think White children are just expendable assets to be sacrificed at the alter of "multiculturalism?"

Remember folks the anti-White mantra of "Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for EVERYONE" is simply genocide. Its a crime and justifying and denying it implicate anti-Whites.

I think the white countries for everyone thing is because whites are the only ones who don't regard foreigners as potential terrorists...or at least try not to. And of course not every race has an entirely equal chance...but that does not mean we have to support racism.

You can think what you like but you are either brain washed with PC, a cultural Marxist or being disingenuous.

Whites in EVERY single White nation on this earth are being brow beaten into accepting this. There has been no voting on this, no voting is allowed to stop this, every poll suggests the majority of White people want immigration to stop and if anyone speaks out against it they are smeared and shouted down with Marxist control words called a "nazithatwantstokillsixmillionjews" and are in risk of losing their job, publicly smeared by the media or thrown in jail. That is JUST like the Soviet Union. We live under second generation communism.

Its INCREDIBLE people on a NWO/Conspiracy site haven't worked this one out.

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White.

I repeat: YOU - ARE - RACIST

Why? Because nothing in what I said supported racism, and yet you are accusing me of being racist. Psychology states that you, in turn, must be racially discriminatory.

I don't talk to racists. Have a good day.

That Marxist control word has lost its bite pal. You are sitting here posting anti-White rhetoric and that makes you anti-White

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White geez get with it.

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha

Originally posted by Starchild23

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha

Originally posted by Starchild23

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha
Anti-Whites still won't take the anti-White challenge. This is........hmmmm i have lost count.......the EIGHTH time i have asked this. Here it is again:

Do you agree that all races. Be it Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, or Whites in Europe, have an equal right to ensure the survival of their own race and cultures in their own countries?

I'll add another for the hell of it:

Why do anti-White think White children are just expendable assets to be sacrificed at the alter of "multiculturalism?"

Remember folks the anti-White mantra of "Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for EVERYONE" is simply genocide. Its a crime and justifying and denying it implicate anti-Whites.

I think the white countries for everyone thing is because whites are the only ones who don't regard foreigners as potential terrorists...or at least try not to. And of course not every race has an entirely equal chance...but that does not mean we have to support racism.

You can think what you like but you are either brain washed with PC, a cultural Marxist or being disingenuous.

Whites in EVERY single White nation on this earth are being brow beaten into accepting this. There has been no voting on this, no voting is allowed to stop this, every poll suggests the majority of White people want immigration to stop and if anyone speaks out against it they are smeared and shouted down with Marxist control words called a "nazithatwantstokillsixmillionjews" and are in risk of losing their job, publicly smeared by the media or thrown in jail. That is JUST like the Soviet Union. We live under second generation communism.

Its INCREDIBLE people on a NWO/Conspiracy site haven't worked this one out.

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White.

I repeat: YOU - ARE - RACIST

Why? Because nothing in what I said supported racism, and yet you are accusing me of being racist. Psychology states that you, in turn, must be racially discriminatory.

I don't talk to racists. Have a good day.

That Marxist control word has lost its bite pal. You are sitting here posting anti-White rhetoric and that makes you anti-White

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White geez get with it.

edit on 13-1-2012 by mr1alphaalpha because: (no reason given)

And you are delusional. Have fun with your paranoia.

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha
Anti-Whites still won't take the anti-White challenge. This is........hmmmm i have lost count.......the EIGHTH time i have asked this. Here it is again:

Do you agree that all races. Be it Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, or Whites in Europe, have an equal right to ensure the survival of their own race and cultures in their own countries?

I'll add another for the hell of it:

Why do anti-White think White children are just expendable assets to be sacrificed at the alter of "multiculturalism?"

Remember folks the anti-White mantra of "Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for EVERYONE" is simply genocide. Its a crime and justifying and denying it implicate anti-Whites.

Lemme take a swing at this...

Firstly I won't say I'm anti-white at all. I believe the people you refer to with that title aren't either, what they are is anti white-is-the-only-race-that-matters. People such as yourself view this as being anti-white. What you complain about happening to whites happens to all races. However since it has BEGUN happening to whites it is now a problem for you.

I'll kill your point with one simple thing: It doesn't matter about your little culture in your little corner of the world. There is only one culture, HUMAN culture. Any one preaching other is an agent of separatism and confusion.

White children also aren't the only victims of multi-culturalism, everyone else faces it too. There are black and asian children also assimulating to this cultural melting pot.

Mr1alphaalpha:

If ALL and ONLY Black countries in 1965 opened their borders and let hundreds of millions of non-Blacks into their countries, and then 90 years later, Blacks are expected to be minorities in the countries that let non-Blacks in; that’s not done by accident. It’s obviously a plan to wipe out the Black race. AKA genocide.

This is what’s been done to my people, White people. It IS genocide.

Thank you for your attempt to answer for the person I was actually speaking to, but you're wrong...again, and it simply shows how faulty your logic is.

If ANY race opens their borders to millions of other people of different races, and those races - over time - become the majority, it is not only likely not an 'accident', it is TO BE EXPECTED. When you are a certain demographic, and you open yourselves up to MANY OTHER demographics, it is only reasonable that your SINGLE demographic may become a minority (ESPECIALLY if those cultures began to bear children).

If you are a black man, and you open your house to a multi-national neighborhood, it is likely that a few Asian, Euro-Caucasian and Australian people will come in. Over time, once those cultures begin to mix, it is only to be expected that the fundamentals of each culture will be somewhat diminished over time. Bam. You are now a minority, and it is not because of a conspiracy, it is because there are more than one race out there, and all you need is to open the floodgates to multiple races before you soon become a minority. Logic, for the win.

Under Article II of the Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

( a ) Killing members of the group;
( b ) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
( c ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part;
( d ) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
( e ) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

And where, under all of this, does simply asking someone to define what they feel a 'white person' is, sit? Under which which one of these does asking someone to clarify the definition of white constitue Genocide?

Also, I fine letter E to be quite interesting. Some of you have tried to make the point that interracial relationships are being forced upon the white man (which is ridiculous). My child is mixed. She is half white, half black. Are you saying that my relationship with her mother - and our subsequent child - were part of some anti-white conspiracy? Again; paranoia and xenophobia take center stage. The fact is that not everyone in this world is racist, so when you allow multiple races to mingle (which places like America really have no choice but to do, at this point), interracial children are to be expect. I'm sorry if that upsets some of you, but that is the way human nature works.

I'll kill your point with one simple thing: It doesn't matter about your little culture in your little corner of the world. There is only one culture, HUMAN culture. Any one preaching other is an agent of separatism and confusion.

White children also aren't the only victims of multi-culturalism, everyone else faces it too. There are black and asian children also assimulating to this cultural melting pot.

Anti-Whites are such outright liars its absurd.

Black and Asian kids may well be "assimulating to this cultural melting pot." in EVERY White country. I have already pointed this out.
HOWEVER Black and Asian kids will still exist in ALL Black African countries and ALL Asian Countries and so will the Arabs and so will the Jews because their countries are NOT being flooded with other races.

There you go. So much for killing my point.

Nice try though

YET again you prove that anti-racism is a code word for anti-White

Originally posted by kaiode1There's a large population of white americans that are pissed off that they can't make blacky go through the back door at restaurants anymore. Threatened because for the first time in a long time they don't feel as if they're at the "top of the food chain" so-to-speak.

Exactly. "Self-preservation" (note the quotation marks: which is also known as ethnocentrism), at it's finest.

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha

I'll kill your point with one simple thing: It doesn't matter about your little culture in your little corner of the world. There is only one culture, HUMAN culture. Any one preaching other is an agent of separatism and confusion.

White children also aren't the only victims of multi-culturalism, everyone else faces it too. There are black and asian children also assimulating to this cultural melting pot.

Anti-Whites are such outright liars its absurd.

Black and Asian kids may well be "assimulating to this cultural melting pot." in EVERY White country. I have already pointed this out.
HOWEVER Black and Asian kids will still exist in ALL Black African countries and ALL Asian Countries and so will the Arabs and so will the Jews because their countries are NOT being flooded with other races.

There you go. So much for killing my point.

Nice try though

YET again you prove that anti-racism is a code word for anti-White

Of course, accuse everyone of lying. One of the first signs of insanity and paranoia. You're obviously the King of Credible now.

I have dated African American women. I have drank with Native Americans. I go to breakfast with the Chinese and Mexicans, and I use the same bathroom as Italians. We call each other brother whenever we pass by, and we all consider each other family. Don't call me racist. You don't know me.

Originally posted by Oneiros247

Mr1alphaalpha:

If ALL and ONLY Black countries in 1965 opened their borders and let hundreds of millions of non-Blacks into their countries, and then 90 years later, Blacks are expected to be minorities in the countries that let non-Blacks in; that’s not done by accident. It’s obviously a plan to wipe out the Black race. AKA genocide.

This is what’s been done to my people, White people. It IS genocide.

Thank you for your attempt to answer for the person I was actually speaking to, but you're wrong...again, and it simply shows how faulty your logic is.

If ANY race opens their borders to millions of other people of different races, and those races - over time - become the majority, it is not only likely not an 'accident', it is TO BE EXPECTED. When you are a certain demographic, and you open yourselves up to MANY OTHER demographics, it is only reasonable that your SINGLE demographic may become a minority (ESPECIALLY if those cultures began to bear children).

If you are a black man, and you open your house to a multi-national neighborhood, it is likely that a few Asian, Euro-Caucasian and Australian people will come in. Over time, once those cultures begin to mix, it is only to be expected that the fundamentals of each culture will be somewhat diminished over time. Bam. You are now a minority, and it is not because of a conspiracy, it is because there are more than one race out there, and all you need is to open the floodgates to multiple races before you soon become a minority. Logic, for the win.

Under Article II of the Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

( a ) Killing members of the group;
( b ) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
( c ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part;
( d ) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
( e ) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

And where, under all of this, does simply asking someone to define what they feel a 'white person' is, sit? Under which which one of these does asking someone to clarify the definition of white constitue Genocide?

Also, I fine letter E to be quite interesting. Some of you have tried to make the point that interracial relationships are being forced upon the white man (which is ridiculous). My child is mixed. She is half white, half black. Are you saying that my relationship with her mother - and our subsequent child - were part of some anti-white conspiracy? Again; paranoia and xenophobia take center stage. The fact is that not everyone in this world is racist, so when you allow multiple races to mingle (which places like America really have no choice but to do, at this point), interracial children are to be expect. I'm sorry if that upsets some of you, but that is the way human nature works.

edit on 13-1-2012 by Oneiros247 because: (no reason given)

Anti-White are quite funny really.

1. "If ANY race opens their borders to millions of other people of different races, and those races - over time - become the majority, it is not only likely not an 'accident', it is TO BE EXPECTED." As i have said NUMEROUS times the people in EVERY White country did NOT vote for this and they can not stop this. Thank you for quite rightly pointed out how this will end up with Whites being made minorities in their own homes and then eventually totally assimilated. I am sure everyone White and normal can see how this is genocide through racial replacement. Nice try at dodging the question shame you inadvertently made my point regarding genocide that much more stronger.

2. I was simply presenting you with the UN Definition because you or some other anti-White tried the old "you have no idea what genocide is" line a few posts ago

3. Read the definition clearly. I'll help you out here "genocide meansany of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group"

We are primary concerned with point C.

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha

Originally posted by Oneiros247

Mr1alphaalpha:

If ALL and ONLY Black countries in 1965 opened their borders and let hundreds of millions of non-Blacks into their countries, and then 90 years later, Blacks are expected to be minorities in the countries that let non-Blacks in; that’s not done by accident. It’s obviously a plan to wipe out the Black race. AKA genocide.

This is what’s been done to my people, White people. It IS genocide.

Thank you for your attempt to answer for the person I was actually speaking to, but you're wrong...again, and it simply shows how faulty your logic is.

If ANY race opens their borders to millions of other people of different races, and those races - over time - become the majority, it is not only likely not an 'accident', it is TO BE EXPECTED. When you are a certain demographic, and you open yourselves up to MANY OTHER demographics, it is only reasonable that your SINGLE demographic may become a minority (ESPECIALLY if those cultures began to bear children).

If you are a black man, and you open your house to a multi-national neighborhood, it is likely that a few Asian, Euro-Caucasian and Australian people will come in. Over time, once those cultures begin to mix, it is only to be expected that the fundamentals of each culture will be somewhat diminished over time. Bam. You are now a minority, and it is not because of a conspiracy, it is because there are more than one race out there, and all you need is to open the floodgates to multiple races before you soon become a minority. Logic, for the win.

Under Article II of the Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

( a ) Killing members of the group;
( b ) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
( c ) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about
its physical destruction in whole or in part;
( d ) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
( e ) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

And where, under all of this, does simply asking someone to define what they feel a 'white person' is, sit? Under which which one of these does asking someone to clarify the definition of white constitue Genocide?

Also, I fine letter E to be quite interesting. Some of you have tried to make the point that interracial relationships are being forced upon the white man (which is ridiculous). My child is mixed. She is half white, half black. Are you saying that my relationship with her mother - and our subsequent child - were part of some anti-white conspiracy? Again; paranoia and xenophobia take center stage. The fact is that not everyone in this world is racist, so when you allow multiple races to mingle (which places like America really have no choice but to do, at this point), interracial children are to be expect. I'm sorry if that upsets some of you, but that is the way human nature works.

edit on 13-1-2012 by Oneiros247 because: (no reason given)

Anti-White are quite funny really.

1. "If ANY race opens their borders to millions of other people of different races, and those races - over time - become the majority, it is not only likely not an 'accident', it is TO BE EXPECTED." As i have said NUMEROUS times the people in EVERY White country did NOT vote for this and they can not stop this. Thank you for quite rightly pointed out how this will end up with Whites being made minorities in their own homes and then eventually totally assimilated. I am sure everyone White and normal can see how this is genocide through racial replacement. Nice try at dodging the question shame you inadvertently made my point regarding genocide that much more stronger.

2. I was simply presenting you with the UN Definition because you or some other anti-White tried the old "you have no idea what genocide is" line a few posts ago

3. Read the definition clearly. I'll help you out here "genocide meansany of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group"

We are primary concerned with point C.

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White

I know, right? You're hilarious too.

The funniest part is how you keep talking about the vindictive and derogatory tendencies of the "Whites" when the only malicious person posting here is you.

Analysis of this entire thread concludes that you are deliberately ignorant, chronically paranoid, and generally a pig-headed moron. That is the most professional result I can deliver.

If that offends you, review your previous posts.

Sorry to everyone else here. The idiocy being displayed here by one user in particular finally got to me. I couldn't hold my tongue anymore. Besides, if we're all racially equal here, that means I can throw accusations too, right?

I'll win this flame-fest.