"Racism" is 100% natural, and is not evil. Homogenization is.

page: 3
59
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 07:56 AM
link   
reply to post by mr1alphaalpha
 


My post above yours was my reply.

I know, and my post below yours was my reply to it.


You can clearly tell i am addressing your points.

Perhaps it seems like that to you, but you are really talking past them.


reply to post by Dark Ghost
 


Would you say the same thing ("them's the breaks") if it were Asian people continually being reminded about how much bad stuff "they" did in the past?

Assuredly. Would you like some Asian examples? Check out the behaviour of Japanese occupying forces throughout Asia, and particularly in China, and specifically in Manchuria, during the Second World War. Or consider the Turkish genocide of the Armenians. Or the Turkish massacre of Jews, Greeks and others in Smyrna. Ethnic and religious riots in India? The bloody horrors of Partition, the trains full of corpses? The endless, multipolar ethnic wars of the Golden Triangle? The killing fields of Cambodia?

And why stay with Asia? Do not the people of Rwanda have to live with the memory of the massacres there? How about the Maoris genocide of the Moriori, the native inhabitants of the Chatham Islands? Man's inhumanity to man knows no geographical or ethnic bounds.

Do you think the perpetrators and the victims of these atrocities, and their descendants, don't have to live with the historical burdens of them? Incidentally, many of these horrors were (rightly) brought to the world's attention by white historians. So who's rubbing whose faces (deservedly) in what?

And that ethnic war in my own country I mentioned earlier? I have forebears of both races. So I have to bear the guilt and agony of both sides as part of my cultural heritage.

Satisfied?


Some people believe there is indeed a conspiracy to promote anti-white sentiment in the West and throughout the world and it is not just based on a whim either.

People believe a lot of false, wicked things.




posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 07:56 AM
link   
reply to post by mr1alphaalpha
 


If you still cannot figure out that there is just ONE race and that everyone has a right to earn a living then you are even more lost than I figured. Take care.



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 07:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by InfoKartel


. Your statement here is one of fear, as you project your own belief onto the straw man "African" that you just created while the scenario you painted is literally IMPOSSIBLE without genocide.





So you admit genocide is possible but then claim there is no such thing as race LOL

Thanks for bringing up genocide though. There is an ongoing program of genocide against my race. Its not an accident that every white country and only White countries are being flooded with other races and everyone is forced to assimilate.

There will still be Africans in Africa
There will still be Asians in Asian
But my race, the White race will be blended out of existence in EVERY White country and ONLY White countries

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:00 AM
link   


Assuredly. Would you like some Asian examples? Check out the behaviour of Japanese occupying forces throughout Asia, and particularly in China, and specifically in Manchuria, during the Second World War. Or consider the Turkish genocide of the Armenians. Or the Turkish massacre of Jews, Greeks and others in Smyrna. Ethnic and religious riots in India? The bloody horrors of Partition, the trains full of corpses? The endless, multipolar ethnic wars of the Golden Triangle? The killing fields of Cambodia?



But no one is demanding that any of those countries listed above should be flooded with other races because of events from the past.

Anti-Whites ONLY use events from the past as justification for flooding EVERY White country with other races and forcing everyone to assimilate.

This is simply genocide.

You prove yet again anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
edit on 13-1-2012 by mr1alphaalpha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:07 AM
link   
reply to post by mr1alphaalpha
 



So you admit genocide is possible but then claim there is no such thing as race LOL


Do you have another word for genocide? It's just a word...funny you mention that I'm applying semantics while it is clearly you.

I believe ONE race exists. A human race. There are millions of ignorant and ill informed people that believe there exist more than one race. They choose who is not part of their own perceived race and murder those whom they perceive to be of a different race. That is a reality and the word genocide describes that reality. Because the word genocide exists does not mean there is more than one race around...


Thanks for bringing up genocide though. There is an ongoing program of genocide against my race. Its not an accident that every white country and only White countries are being flooded with other races and everyone is forced to assimilate.


He-he. I can read a confused white supremacist from half the globe away through sentence structuring and argument formulating, you owe me a second beer.

You do know the reason why people flock to the West is because it is more wealthy and offers more opportunities to people? And do you know why that is possible? Because the West raped and pillaged the valuables from the countries these people are from. Reality sucks but this is it. No need to be delusional and make your insecurity-issues worse by thinking up a conspiracy. Think a little instead of parroting others.


There will still be Africans in Africa
There will still be Asians in Asian
But my race, the White race will be blended out of existence in EVERY White country and ONLY White countries


Wow, you really are delusional...


Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White


You really like calling yourself white huh...(the need to belong to a group, superiority complex that is fading...sure I can see why you have these issues you talk about in this thread...but they are illogical and exist only when you are fearful)



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by InfoKartel


You do know the reason why people flock to the West is because it is more wealthy and offers more opportunities to people? And do you know why that is possible? Because the West raped and pillaged the valuables from the countries these people are from. Reality sucks but this is it. No need to be delusional and make your insecurity-issues worse by thinking up a conspiracy. Think a little instead of parroting others.

.



So you believe that ONE race exists but THEN you go on to clearly identity non Whites as being distinct from Whites because their countries were "raped and pillaged" in the past. LOL

Could it be you are just another brainwashed anti-White individual that believes in the ethnic displacement and genocide of the White race? I think so.

You prove my point

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White

Cheers



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:16 AM
link   
reply to post by mr1alphaalpha
 



So you believe that ONE race exists but THEN you go on to clearly identity non Whites as being distinct from Whites because their countries were "raped and pillaged" in the past. LOL


Boy you must be lost when a different culture or way of life means different race.

I wish you well.

(btw last of my replies to you, either read what I write and try to understand it or just make yourself out as the xenophobe).

Edit:


Could it be you are just another brainwashed ...


Brainwashed...you're barking up the wrongest tree for that one little man.
edit on 13-1-2012 by InfoKartel because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha

Originally posted by InfoKartel


. Your statement here is one of fear, as you project your own belief onto the straw man "African" that you just created while the scenario you painted is literally IMPOSSIBLE without genocide.




There will still be Africans in Africa
There will still be Asians in Asian
But my race, the White race will be blended out of existence in EVERY White country and ONLY White countries


LOL, maybe you should step out of your own little circle and read a little geography of the 21st century.

As for the "white countries" from the words of Russel Peters "You can't invade my country, live for 500 years then leave!!! We are coming with you!" lol



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:21 AM
link   
reply to post by luciddream
 


Cool! Another anti-White. Care to take the challenge? No one has won it yet! All we need is a simple yes or no answer. Ready???? Here goes........

Do you agree that all races. Be it Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, or Whites in Europe, have an equal right to ensure the survival of their own race and cultures in their own countries?

Cheers
edit on 13-1-2012 by mr1alphaalpha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by mr1alphaalpha
reply to post by luciddream
 


Do you agree that all races. Be it Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, or Whites in Europe, have an equal right to ensure the survival of their own race and cultures in their own countries?

Cheers


So your problem is, you can't come to my turf because you are different?

Its a little too late to tell all the black people to go back to Africa after all the white men sucking up all the resources and ruining the country. and.. what the fudge is Asians? Indian, Chinese, ... its a big continent.. anyway.

If this was before invasion and "conquering" of Africa and some blacks decided mass immigrate to Europe than you could get offended.

If Everyone stayed in their own country from the start, then this would not have happened, and now its too late to say "sorry you can go back now". I don't remember "multicultralism" about 1200 years ago.



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:39 AM
link   
Lets not forget
the OP could be black, white, asian, a jew..

Op is speaking for any race
and I somewhat agree with op.



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by mr1alphaalpha
 


Do you accept your distant ancestors left Africa ? Did they have milky white skin under an unforgiving sun ?



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:01 AM
link   
reply to post by luciddream
 


You are using the old "Because of colonization" strawman.

As i said before The Zulus in Africa conquered and nearly wiped out the Hottentots.
But nobody says the Africans need to accept and integrate with millions of non-Blacks for this.
The Ottoman empire and Moorish empire stole large parts of Europe and made the Christians slaves.
But nobody says the Muslim countries need to accept and integrate with millions of non-Muslims for this.
People only say this about ALL White countries and ONLY White countries. But then we ALL know that THESE people are anti-White. They support the genocide of White people and at the same time call themselves “anti-racist”

I notice you sidestepped the question. I'll repeat it again for the 6th time. Come on someone must want to win the challenge. A simple yes or no answer is all i ask:

Do you agree that all races. Be it Blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, or Whites in Europe, have an equal right to ensure the survival of their own race and cultures in their own countries?



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:04 AM
link   
reply to post by UmbraSumus
 


Irrelevant straw man. As i keep saying no one would say any of that nonsense to a Chinese, Japanese or Jewish man to try and justify flooding their country with other races. Any sane Chinese, Japanese or Jewish man would realize this was just double speak that attempted to deny the genocide of his race.

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:22 AM
link   
reply to post by CaticusMaximus
 


Beautifully said.
I'd give you a million flags and stars if I could.
If only they would teach this in schools and promote it on TV instead of the creeping mutual anhiliation currently being promoted.



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:23 AM
link   
reply to post by mr1alphaalpha
 

I will answer your question, even though you didn't address me, as soon as you would kindly answer mine.

I am a product of imperial conquest, colonialism and the triangle trade. My mother's side is 100% Native American, my father's side is African American / Creole.
I do however, now live abroad, in an "all-White" country.

Now, my question is - Could you kindly direct me to my racially designated country, where I can live unbothered by other races?

If I were to go by just one half of my racial makeup, (and I will pick the Native side, for lack of knowledge of the exact origin of my Black side, due to the Europeans' negligent human cargo book keeping), I would have to say, I have NO right to live in my country, unbothered by people of other colors or creeds.
I would however, by your theory, have the natural right of helping everybody who wrongfully occupies my territory, to pack and take their behinds back to wherever they came from.
That would make for a LOT of insanely over-populated, crowded "all-White" countries, wouldn't it?

I'd like to ask you another question, if I may. Would you have a problem with other White people, coming to live in your country?
Like let's say a bunch of Polish, Romanian and Ukrainian people, given they are all White and of some type of Christian faith.

One more thing, the reason why nobody talks about the Zulus and the Chinese and whatever example you might want to bring up is simple! They only colonized/killed/oppressed/destroyed ONE, maybe 2 other, (mostly neighboring) nations.

The White People, (I will just generalize here like you do), actually went out and ventured across oceans and continents and managed to colonize/kill/oppress/destroy EVERYBODY they encountered.
So, naturally, a lot more people may have been left p*ssed and complaining .

Do I have a problem with Whites in general? NO.
Do I think they should be actively punished for their ancestors' guilt? NO.
Is it something they will just have to deal with? YES! As we, the rest, have learned and try to deal with the outcome of their AND our ancestors' deeds.



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:28 AM
link   
reply to post by VivaLaEvolution
 


Going to the gym. I'll address this fully when i get back

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-white

Cheers



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:49 AM
link   
I cant believe that you would even post this, I haven't read it, not going to, the title alone suggests that you are in support of racism, if this is not the case you should have chosen your words more carefully, if racism was natural that would make me and indeed everybody racist which I can assure you we are not.
You could argue that discrimination is natural which comes from the tribe mentality of "us" and "them" which would see us providing for us to preserve our tribes longevity and survival so that our genes will be the ones that are passed on, this in a nutshell is natural selection and the reason for evolution.
The other tribe or "them" may be just like us in every way but they are not "us" and do not contribute to our long term survival. Observe the animal world for examples of this, or read Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene or something similar. Whatever you do do not post with titles that give the un-evolved an excuse to continue in their ignorant and racist ways. Thanks.

Just to clarify- This was my boyfriends post. I really should log out or make him and account of his own!
edit on 13-1-2012 by Bex33 because: Reasons



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by MalusLupus
reply to post by CaticusMaximus
 


i understand your point.. but its not wise to insult people just to get in the headlines...

u should not resort to sick word play and misinformation to get views..

I suggest you change your title to something more appropriate that gets your point across.. because insisting in one line that everyone is inherently racist is a horrible insult and throw civil right back decades


The only ones Ive insulted are the PTB, saying they are poisonous goo that has coagulated at the top of our societal power structures. While insulting, its also very truthful


I said everyone was "racist". In quotes, meaning in the now standard colloquial sense, not the more literal, strict dictionary definition. I think that "racisms" expanded meaning is dangerous. I try to explain why. Others have added to that.

No misinformation, maybe a touch of word play to illustrate a point, but I think its the very unpolitically correct context and idea that is upsetting people. Its contrary to their programming



posted on Jan, 13 2012 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bex33
I cant believe that you would even post this, I haven't read it, not going to, the title alone suggests that you are in support of racism, if this is not the case you should have chosen your words more carefully, if racism was natural that would make me and indeed everybody racist which I can assure you we are not.
You could argue that discrimination is natural which comes from the tribe mentality of "us" and "them" which would see us providing for us to preserve our tribes longevity and survival so that our genes will be the ones that are passed on, this in a nutshell is natural selection and the reason for evolution.
The other tribe or "them" may be just like us in every way but they are not "us" and do not contribute to our long term survival. Observe the animal world for examples of this, or read Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene or something similar. Whatever you do do not post with titles that give the un-evolved an excuse to continue in their ignorant and racist ways. Thanks.


"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"





new topics
top topics
 
59
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join