"Area 51" the book by Annie Jacobsen has left me feeling, WELL............., page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 12-1-2012 @ 05:38 PM by Ops4Ops
..........Weird. Ok let me explain from the beginning. My Mission: To begin collecting and reading books about my internal affliction and irrational obsession with the infamous Area 51. My Goal: To learn as much as my human brain will allow me too at the time. (Seeing as to how we only have access and use only a small percentage of our brain, on this earthly realm of ours.) After doing some searching I decided my first book would be "Area 51" by Annie Jacobsen. Reasons being it was new, (published in 2011) and the reviews and descriptions describe it as a timeline of Area 51. Starting from the picking of the perfect place,(Groom Lake) all the way through the construction phase (that still seems to be going on), and interviews with people that actually worked there and how they get there (Janet), and so on up to the present. Most all can be discussed now because of our kind government's declassification of some of the OLD documents. (some they can't deny anymore after getting sued)
**I also invented a new drinking game while reading this book. Directions: Everytime the author has to write/use
the qoute "On A Need To Know Basis" when talking about anything security at Area 51, TAKE A SHOT OR SIP OF COCKTAIL OF CHOICE. Guarentee want take but a few minutes and you probably want remember the rest of the night, but don't worry, in the morning the hangover will remind you!.
The book also made me change one of my main opinions about the Roswell Incident. Now I am thinking it was a spy plane shaped like some kind of capsule, built by the Horton Brothers, and thats why they didn't want us to know because they did not want to admit that the other side was way more advance'd than we were in aeronautic department.
I would also like to say how weird it made me feel to know that they took foreign Scientist (Many worked for Hitler) brought them to Area 51, and put them to work with nuclear weapons and Top Secret Operations. I know if I were taken prisoner by another country and put to work developing machines and weapons that could cause Mass Destruction and destroy my homeland as well, I'm pretty sure "not working to my full potential" and "not exactly doing it correctly" is an Understatement.(Only one episode speaks of this happening in the book by a Russian Scientist.
So Finally, Please let me know how this book made you feel and if you have any suggestion's on books that would be great for my mission! I hope you enjoyed my thread and look forward to conversing with you!!


reply posted on 12-1-2012 @ 06:09 PM by chr0naut
reply to post by Ops4Ops



Ah the "wall of text while playing drinking games" approach.

I'm not exactly sure of your point in this post?


reply posted on 12-1-2012 @ 06:19 PM by Ops4Ops
reply to post by chr0naut



What I am looking for is people who wanna discuss this book and how they felt about it and what they got out of it about A51, and suggestions of other good books out there that would be a good read for me on this subject.



reply posted on 12-1-2012 @ 06:29 PM by FosterVS
Originally posted by Ops4Ops
reply to
post by chr0naut



What I am looking for is people who wanna discuss this book and how they felt about it and what they got out of it about A51, and suggestions of other good books out there that would be a good read for me on this subject.


Try doing a search here for Annie Jacobsen, particularily comments from "Shadowhawk", and you will find out how much she is reviled for her "book". Or check out comments directly from TD Barnes and Peter Merlin on the Dreamlandresort website message board.


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 08:15 PM by Ops4Ops
reply to post by chr0naut



I have been adopted now, and have been told what the "wall of text" means. I apoligize, this was like my 2nd post and I am just learning.


reply posted on 14-1-2012 @ 02:29 AM by chr0naut
Originally posted by Ops4Ops
reply to
post by chr0naut



I have been adopted now, and have been told what the "wall of text" means. I apoligize, this was like my 2nd post and I am just learning.


S'OK, I'm just a bit too sarcastic at times.

Please forgive me.


reply posted on 16-1-2012 @ 05:01 PM by Shadowhawk
Jacobsen's book is full of factual errors as well as evidence of her fear and misunderstanding of nuclear issues. I wont go into all of the problems with her book right now, but I will address a few issues.

First of all, there were no nuclear tests (explosions, rockets, etc.) at Area 51. The nuclear engine tests took place at Area 25 (Jackass Flat) near the southern end of the Nevada Test Site. You can see the test stands today from Highway 95. I have toured the entire area several times, including the test stands. Yes, a small rocket engine reactor was intentionally blown up for the purpose of measuring radiation levels for accident modeling, and to develop clean-uptechniques. Remember, this is the Nevada Test Site where both above ground and underground full-scale nuclear explosions took place, along with numerous smaller radiation experiments. The small reactor explosion would have been relatively inconsequential.

And they did not intentionally drop an unarmed nuclear bomb to see how bad the contamination would be, "and then just left it there." That is nonsense. Project 57 - which took place in Area 13, about 5 miles northwest of Groom Lake - involved an XW-25 warhead on a fixed test stand. A single detonator was fired, destroying the device and contaminating a a previously defined test area that was then used for developing clean-up techniques. The results also provided information on potential nuclear weapon accidents, and allowed trained responders to practice containment and decontamination.

Project OXCART was the A-12, not the SR-71. Evolutionary variants of the A-12 included the YF-12, M-21, and SR-71. A total of 50 airframes were built including thirteen A-12s (one was a trainer), three YF-12s, two M-21s, and thrity-two SR-71s (three were trainers). Of these, a total of 20 were lost in accidents including five A-12s, two YF-12s, one M-21, and twelve SR-71s. I have visited eight of the crash sites.


reply posted on 16-1-2012 @ 07:59 PM by Ops4Ops
reply to post by Shadowhawk



I have read some of your stuff on here, and am very intrigued by your comments!! Thanks for replying to my post! Got any suggestions for good reads on Area 51?


reply posted on 17-1-2012 @ 02:28 PM by Elisha03011972
reply to post by Ops4Ops



Unholy Alliance by Peter Lavenda
www.youtube.com...
The video is long but worth every minute of your time.


reply posted on 17-1-2012 @ 03:06 PM by Shadowhawk
I forced myself to read Jacobsen's book twice. On the second pass, I went over the text page by page to identify factual errors. I found more than three dozen, and other readers (with different subject matter expertise) have since pointed out additional errors.

In a review shortly after publication, authors and Cold War historians Robert S. Norris and Jeffrey T. Richelson described the book as "deeply flawed, and noted that "All too often, Jacobsen’s history of the activities that did occur at the facility is filled with errors of commission and omission. One has to wonder what role her editors played in overseeing this book, and why so many mistakes and preposterous claims survived editorial review."

They charged that "Jacobsen’s command of nuclear history and science is almost non-existent. There are so many mistakes that it is hard to know where to begin."

Aviation writers Jeannette Remak and Joseph Ventolo Jr. had this to say: "Her book is fraught with errors and not recommended reading for anyone serious about Cold War history, UFO and Aviation research, Black programs, and the men and women that participated in them."

This is just covering the basic historical errors. Jacobsen's ridiculous new Roswell tale is a whole other kettle of fish. Numerous authors, historians, and analysts have since thoroughly dissected this bit of fantasy that was supplied to Jacobsen by an elderly nuclear weaponeer who apparently never even worked at Area 51.

Dwayne Day, a frequent writer on overhead reconnaissance history and a senior program officer for the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board at the National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences traced the origins of this bizarre tale to a 1956 short story by James Blish that was published in Astounding Science Fiction magazine. The story, "Tomb Tapper," is about a mysterious Russian craft that crashes and is mistaken for an alien spacecraft. It is piloted by a genetically engineered child whose body is recovered from the wreckage. The parallels between the story related by Jacobsen's source and the Blish sci-fi story are impossible to ignore.

In a review for the Washington Post, historian Richard Rhodes criticized Jacobsen's investigative reporting skills: "In attributing the stories she reports to an unnamed engineer and Manhattan Project veteran while seemingly failing to conduct even minimal research into the man’s sources, Jacobsen shows herself at a minimum extraordinarily gullible or journalistically incompetent."


reply posted on 17-1-2012 @ 11:14 PM by ZEinstein
reply to post by Ops4Ops



may want to check out the new one that came out in december - "groom lake" by bryan o. reviews are good on amazon UK and US.


reply posted on 18-1-2012 @ 07:56 PM by dalek
Originally posted by Ops4Ops
reply to
post by chr0naut



What I am looking for is people who wanna discuss this book and how they felt about it and what they got out of it about A51, and suggestions of other good books out there that would be a good read for me on this subject.



I can't recommend any other books about Area 51 but I can recommend any posts made by Gariac who posts on this topic
here are a few sites that are also useful
www.lazygranch.com...

www.dreamlandresort.com...
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 4 days ago with 8 member flags
\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags
YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 5 days ago with 2 member flags