Not that anyone will go with my qualifications or physics theories -- but I'm here because people at Slashdot seem to be a little TOO FULL of the
ideas of others, so occasionally, I have to blurt out my own theories somewhere.
>> I have three ways of FREE ENERGY that I can think of;
I do think some kind of Fusion can be done -- but not with any of these methods. I predict that the bose-einstein condensate will be enhanced by what
I would call a "matter laser" -- basically, you cool not by removing all energy from the mass, but my synchronizing frequencies -- the same near
absolute zero temperatures can be reached because "uniform motion" does not produce heat like random motion -- but you can convert residual energy
into pattern energy.
Matter can be fused this way but it would kind of fly in the face of current theories.
Matter Lasers would bleed off any non-harmonic frequencies (heat for normal matter) likely as larger packets of energy, either soliton em fields or
"hot pockets" -- as I visualize the interactions in this strange state would cause "random states" to pool up like oil on water. Much like when we
see non-newtonian fluid experiments typically form stable "globs" whenever their frequencies are disrupted.
>> SECOND, I predict a kind of sub plank length energy source. It's my rejection of Quantum Physics - not that I don't think the math is sound, and
Quantum Physics has years of a proven track record at being able to explain observed phenomena -- but the visualization of how things actually work is
off track. It's a particle model, and I believe everything can be explained with fields and soliton vacuums (like a tiny black hole -- they just
don't have a billion stars of energy to expand them -- a black hole is merely in essence, an accelerated proton -- this does not mean that it would
have a super powerful net positive charge, for those who buy into that "electric universe" stuff).
Anywho, the REASON I think Quantum Mechanics LOOKS real, is because these fields (that appear as 3D particles in our 4D universe because they are
interactions in 12 dimensions), only interact at synchronous peaks. For example; Quantum theory states you cannot both know a particles location and
speed a the same time and that "observation" collapses probabilistic states. Also, that electrons are either in one orbital around an atom's
nucleus or another -- they can quickly change position but never be found in an intermediate state.
If you ever vibrate a glass of water such that it's frequency MATCHES the radius of the glass container, you can create a stable waveform much like
the orbitals I imagine around an atom. The Electron "shell" is one of those stable waves. Since all our test equipment is made up of photos and
other atoms -- any interaction with an atom, is only going to occur at these wave peaks. The "packet" nature of Quantum Physics can be entirely
explained by energy levels -- anything that DOESN'T have both the correct frequency and enough energy is NOT transmitted nor does it interact.
This predicts the behavior of Neutrinos and Tachyons -- since they can pass through whole stars and planets and their chances of "interaction" are
very, very rare. It has to do with the energy level and frequency being too high for the normal matter. They may have mass, but only with other
"particles" like Neutrinos and Tachyons -- which I would explain with an alternative theory of gravity.
I'm not saying there aren't particles -- these fields "might as well be" -- but that's only because we SEE in 4 dimensions and are made up of
>> The point of this alternative theory is that I predict you can "bleed off" all the energy you want from what is now
or Zero Point Energy.
The key difference is; I think that any energy exchanged below a Planck length "cheats" the accounting system. Our Newtonian perspective is that you
burn some oil, and the chemical reactions in it release stored energy as oxygen is bonded with the hydrocarbons -- it too energy to create that, and
all you can do is burn things and get more complex substances and harness the energy released. You don't get to "decomplexify matter" or put it in
a higher potential energy state without energy used.
The trick is creating some "form" of structure that can harness atomic motion without interacting with the "peaks" -- which turns out to be
shorter than a Planck. Which is, impossible for "normal" matter. The solution goes back to one of the thought problems that sent me on this track;
Why are things solid? Based purely on the space occupied by matter, they shouldn't be.
Atoms that form bonds, are also creating stable fluctuations in "space-time". If you can fluctuate space time-- you can create solids without atoms
(force fields)... anyway, I've droned on long enough.
Someone else a 100 years from now, might do something with this, as I'm not going to have a lab to do it.