NASA Officially confirms: Cold Fusion(LENR) is REAL, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 102 times


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 02:04 AM by PutAQuarterIn
I had never heard of LENR so I searched it and found some reading.....I don't have a horse in this race but for anyone like me just hearing this term This seems to be a good starting read....or maybe someone more well versed in this can tell me if this info is less than creditable...
edit on 13-1-2012 by PutAQuarterIn because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 02:16 AM by mileysubet
Originally posted by NeoVain
Originally posted by MastaShake
reply to
post by NeoVain




this video gave me goosebumps. its one thing to have a person claim to have discovered cold fusion but its another to have nasa verify it


After the research i have previously done on the Rossi E-cat, i already knew it was real. This NASA confirmation just helps confirm it to at least some of the unbelievers who still choose to doubt everything they come across.
edit on 12-1-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)




You use the word confirm way too much when there was no confirmation of any such thing you claim in your sources.


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 02:54 AM by Longshots
reply to post by NeoVain



Very interesting to see NASA coming out with info on this. I would think this development would be top priority for our nation. Just think how great this would be for us and the world.



reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 02:54 AM by NeoVain
reply to post by mileysubet



Oh one post on semantics and one on snake oil... got it.

Maybe your 3rd post will be constructive?


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 04:00 AM by mileysubet
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to
post by mileysubet



Oh one post on semantics and one on snake oil... got it.

Maybe your 3rd post will be constructive?



Nice deflection.

When it comes to semantics: in science it can make or break the "proof".

Snake oil? absolutely. They use to sell this cure all to the gullible and still do apparently.

My three post have been more in touch with reality than all your post combined.


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 04:11 AM by NeoVain
Originally posted by mileysubet
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to
post by mileysubet



Oh one post on semantics and one on snake oil... got it.

Maybe your 3rd post will be constructive?



Nice deflection.

When it comes to semantics: in science it can make or break the "proof".

Snake oil? absolutely. They use to sell this cure all to the gullible and still do apparently.

My three post have been more in touch with reality than all your post combined.


Guess not..


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 04:38 AM by TOMFROMOZ
reply to post by NeoVain



Thanks for that I've just checked back for any replies to my request so I'll check it out now. Onya!


reply posted on 13-1-2012 @ 04:49 AM by mcdgray129
reply to post by NeoVain


Dont worry many of this people seem to want it on paper before they can believe it .
And this is great news , the video showed me real hope for our world if we can move from fossil fuels to this .
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Starship Enterprise could be a reality by 2032, engineer says
  Posted 15 days ago with 77 member flags
TV Networks Say You\'re Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials
  Posted 2 days ago with 39 member flags
Schoolboy \'genius\' solves puzzles posed by Sir Isaac Newton
  Posted 3 days ago with 21 member flags
I want to build a free energy generator! Suggestions?
  Posted 18 days ago with 20 member flags
World’s longest-running experiment now with webcam
  Posted 16 days ago with 19 member flags
Bye Bye Co2 and global warming
  Posted 8 days ago with 16 member flags
Big Oil Vs. Plasma Battery Technology - Guess who is winning?
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags