Q&A Session with John Lear, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 11:15 AM by johnlear
Originally posted by partykid
John, believing your story, we are an experiment and ETs, whoever they are, made us to think that we are the only intelligent lifeform in the universe, but we don't .. That could mean the experiment probably is gone wrong? Also you didn't answer the q. i asked previous, about underground cities .. Has anyone you know tried to search for entrypoints, dig? Also, you stated, you tried to find them for yourself, can you share us your story on this matter? In the matter of fact, i belive John completely about underground cities, for example, take an atlas, and look at Antarctica, huge land mass, i doubt that it's empty even nowadays, but i wonder how deep are the cities. Reminds me Zion from "Matrix", actually.



Regarding the experiment going wrong that could be. Evidence indicates that on the last go around around brains were reduced in size I think the figure is 1300 cc's. This still may have been too much because we were supposed to believe unquestioningly in God. They sent (according the the government "Yellow Book" Jesus and 2 others to "organize and pacify" mankind. We were given the 10 commandments, the Koran and other 'rules' specifically so that we wouldn't 'hurt ourselves' during the experiment. Yes, it certainly looks like things aren't going as planned. Murphy's Law states: If something can go wrong, it will." O'Tooles observation on Murphy's Law is: "Murphy was an optomist."

Regarding the underground entry points, yes I have several friends that have searched for them. Cherry Hinkle who was Castellanos (Dulce security guard) contact claimed she once found an entrance and described an elevator to an underground city. The Smithsonian expedition down the COlorado River in 1907 found the entrance to an underground city (no longer inhabited) with giant rooms, artifacts of a race that was well over 7 feet tall and tunnels that extended at least 80 under New Mexico. Of course there is the underground complex at Groom Lake with extends down at least 6 levels and an extensive underground complex under Edwards AFB that extends west to the Tehachapies, south to Grey Butte andd west to Helendale. No one I know who is familiar with the extent of the underground bases was ignorant enough to 'dig'. This is just not feasible or practical. As far my search for underground facilities that was limited to my 2 days in Dulce. It was not that interesting and I will describe it later. I will post a few website that document underground facilities but you can find tons more yourself by reading the Branton Files. Branton was a friend and we used to share information.


reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 11:39 AM by johnlear
Originally posted by Vegas
Hi John,

Can you please give us your opinions regarding David Sereda's ‘ NASA Evidence’ investigations and what were your conclusions to Sereda's outcome?

What are your opinions of the STS-80 footage of the formation of UFO's over North Africa?

Is this not the most ignored UFO footage of all time? Not counting all the other NASA footage. Do you think that NASA are becoming the ‘laughing stock’ of the scientific community, because of their refusal to acknowledge that we are getting visited by other civilizations and have been for centuries?


David Sereda, 'NASA Evidence' was one of the most fascinating and understated videos I ever saw. Very, very interesting. It left me with the thought "What the hell is going on?"

STS-80, of course, was actual UFO's and possibly Star Wars weapons interacting. Ron Madely (now temporarily disappeared) got into NASA to look at the original tapes of STS-80 and found that they had been spliced to take out material. You have to realize that the main reason NASA has so many failures is because 90% of their effort is devoted to covering up what they have found in the other 10% Their job is almost as daunting as that of the National Transportation Safety Board which has to spend 95% of their time trying to figure out how to cover up the real cause of accidents without looking like total jerks to the pilot community. NTSB coverups: Arrow Air, Gander, Newfoundland terroist bomb in rear cargo Canadian NTSB: ice on the wings. UAL (B-737), Colorado Springs, pilot suicide, NTSB: Clear air turbulence. USAIR (B-727, Pittsburgh, pilot suicide, NTSB: yaw damper malfunction. TWA800 (B-747) accidentally shot down by US Navy NTSB: center tank fuel explosion. AA587 (A-300) Belle Harbor, NY terrorist bomb NTSB: vertical fin failure due to excessive pilot rudder input. UA93 (B-757 Shanksville shot down by F-16 using 20mm cannon NTSB: pilot loss of control.

Regarding NASA being the laughing stock of the scientific community we should all be aware that scientists are held on a very tight leash by their scientific associations and organizations. Their reputation and work availability depnd on whether or not they toe the party line. Although they may privately agree what the truth is they cnnopt say it publicly.


reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 11:55 AM by johnlear
Originally posted by lost
john has a lot of questions to answer

including:

if the gov. will never willingly disclose, and there is more to the story than we can guess at; why then dont you fill us in on what we're missing? also, if disclosure is a lost cause why do you visit this site? to watch us run around in circles?

answer when you get to it.

-lost



Why don't I fill you in? First of all you wouldn't believe. Second of all I have already spoken about everything I know on Art Bell, fantasticforum.com and several threads of ATS. You might try typing my name on your favorite search engine. Unfortunately I do not have a website nor have I written any books. The main reason for this is to eliminate the argument, "You got to remember, John Lear is just trying to sell a book." Up to this point I have been able to get along without compensation for the material. An extra added bonus is that I get to change my mind as new facts become available without having to release a 'revised' book.

Why do I visit these sites? A few morons notwithstanding, there are people who are genuinely interested in whats really going on. While I don't know everything or even most everything I do know a little bit which I am happy to share. And it makes it easier for me when I don't have a book or website to peddle, I can say, "Hey, this is what I think, take it or leave it...I have nothing to gain." No, I don't enjoy watching anybody run around in circles. The only argument that really irritates me is when I get asked to "Prove it". I can't prove it, if I could it wouldn't be a secret. I can present facts, I can show pictures, I can speculate....but in most cases I cannot prove anything. And thats a fact. Proof is like art....you may not know much about it but you know what you like.................



reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 01:41 PM by SMR
Hey John,
I was just reading an article,among others,about you and who you are since I was not aware.
I came across one that seems very damaging and wanted to now if you had any opinions on it.
It can be found here
LEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS

I also came acroos your interview with Art Bell Found here and was wondering what your thoughts or claims are on the alien interview that have been talked about here on ATS found HERE

Thanks for your time.



reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 01:59 PM by johnlear
Originally posted by SMR
Hey John,
I was just reading an article,among others,about you and who you are since I was not aware.
I came across one that seems very damaging and wanted to now if you had any opinions on it.
It can be found here
LEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS

I also came acroos your interview with Art Bell Found here and was wondering what your thoughts or claims are on the alien interview that have been talked about here on ATS found HERE

Thanks for your time.



Lear and Loathing in Las Vegas was written by close friend Lars Hannsen. Or to be exact former close friend. Some of it is true, some of it isn't. Yes, it is damaging but I chose not to respond to the article. I would prefer to respond to specific questions, if any, relating to the article rather than make a blanket 'its all bs", because its not. Some of it is true.

I'm not sure what you mean by alien interview, but I stand behind everything I write on ATS, fantastic.forum, and said on the Art Bell show.


reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 03:54 PM by lacan
Originally posted by johnlear
Why don't I fill you in? First of all you wouldn't believe. Second of all I have already spoken about everything I know on Art Bell, fantasticforum.com and several threads of ATS. You might try typing my name on your favorite search engine. Unfortunately I do not have a website nor have I written any books. The main reason for this is to eliminate the argument, "You got to remember, John Lear is just trying to sell a book." Up to this point I have been able to get along without compensation for the material. An extra added bonus is that I get to change my mind as new facts become available without having to release a 'revised' book.

Why do I visit these sites? A few morons notwithstanding, there are people who are genuinely interested in whats really going on. While I don't know everything or even most everything I do know a little bit which I am happy to share. And it makes it easier for me when I don't have a book or website to peddle, I can say, "Hey, this is what I think, take it or leave it...I have nothing to gain." No, I don't enjoy watching anybody run around in circles. The only argument that really irritates me is when I get asked to "Prove it". I can't prove it, if I could it wouldn't be a secret. I can present facts, I can show pictures, I can speculate....but in most cases I cannot prove anything. And thats a fact. Proof is like art....you may not know much about it but you know what you like.................


Believe you? I don't think many people are believing you as it is.

I would for one would be interested in being "filled in" if you could take the time.. You don't have much to lose really. If you could point me in the direction of an interview or whatnot, or speak out here on this thread, I'd like to know the big secret.


reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 04:01 PM by SMR
lacan
Google is your friend
Google search for John Lear
I even provided a couple links in my posts above.
That search brings up some good stuff on john


reply posted on 13-9-2004 @ 04:16 PM by partykid
Originally posted by SMR
lacan
Google is your friend
Google search for John Lear
I even provided a couple links in my posts above.
That search brings up some good stuff on john


Well, let's not discriminate those who are less educated on UFO/ET subject. Besides that, I think that John's opinion is the most credible here on ATS concerning UFO/ET matter. Maybe im wrong, maybe im not.

FOR THOSE WHO SAY JOHN LEAR IS A HOAX ALL ALONG, PRESENT WHY.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 9 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 19 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags