9/11: A Boeing 757 Struck the Pentagon, page 85
Pages: <<  82    83    84    85    86    87    88  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 70 times


reply posted on 23-7-2005 @ 10:28 PM by vista
The world is running out of energy - within our lifetime no more automobiles. The government orchestrated these attacks as the justification for EVERYTHING. The War on Terror has conveniently been reborn by another false-flag terrorist operation on London These are the facts, let’s move on. The issue now is to plan for the looming energy transition and further government oppression... Patriot Act extension to give FBI sweeping powers: www.earthtimes.org... A missile hit the Pentagon - everyone knows this. Rumsfeld even said so. Dammit.


reply posted on 24-7-2005 @ 02:25 PM by flurryman
This article is a very great and busy work to begin with. However, it's utterly flawed. Did it occur to anybody that this photo is in absolute contradiction to this great piece of scientific work? Oh so scientific? If the LS-Dyna or whatever animation were right, both wings entered the building and were literally shreddered by the steel reinforced concrete columns. Could any kind sould please explain to me (I am just a poor Electronics Engineer, so bear with me) how the wings could possibly have tunneled or beamed through the outer walls of the building? They must have - the photo above is the evidence. There were no two large horizontal slots poked into the wall by the wings in order to be able to enter the building to begin with. Just a 16-20 ft. hole. Oh, the 757 is a sweepback wing plane. Aaah - this explains it. Sort of. And then, this 16-20 ft. hole is situated directly on the ground. The 757 is a low wing aeroplane with the engines below the wings. If this hole is from the 757 poking through the wall, the wings must have stayed outside, and so must the engines. Has anybody seen any RB211 remainders on the outside? No? Just the APU turbine? No two RB211s? Oooops. This is utter nonsense. And nowhere is any evidence when the animation was made. Before, or after the event. Next thing is the RB211 engines. We've seen a couple of photos what such an engine looks like after a plane crash. There were no big pieces of any such engine to be seen on any of the pictures. The only thing we see is shreddered metal, just as if the plane was detonated. Where have all the parts been taken to, and has any independent commission conducted a plane crash survey? Normally this is the FAA's job, right? Just curious. Utter nonsense. This article does not support any notion of a real plane crash. Whatever crashed there -- if it was a 757, it was brought to an explosion when hitting the building. Or it was something else carrying some parts of a crashed 757. Any maybe some bodies. The whole thing reminds me of Sept. 1, 1939. This whole 9/11 thing.


reply posted on 24-7-2005 @ 06:12 PM by Ernold Same
Great work, totally convinced me, thanks alot. What i cant understand is that when all the facts are laid out like this why people still wont agree. Yes there are still some facts that arent crystal clear, but surely you can understand theres not much previous data of passenger planes being flown into highly re-inforced concrete/steel structured buildings to work from. As someone in a very high position in the US intel once said "the simplest and most common sense answer is usually the correct one" How can you disregard the facts and say the wings cannot do this and cant possibley do that? what proof and previous knowledge of this sort of accident do you have? can you really comprehend the speed and force of the impact compared from an engineering point of view how weak an airliner is? the way some of you speak its as though planes are cut from a billet block of steel!!! the reason the hole is so small is because the only weight and strength in an airliner able to cause such damage is, as mentioned, due to the heavy structure being mostly around the lower fusalage, i'm no aircraft engineer but i do work with aluminium and even i can see why it just vapourised, its just glorified tin foil. what do you want? a 757 on the grass infront of the pentagon with a snubbed nose and a couple smoking engines?? get real, the impact would of been colosal, and is only down to the extraordinary strength of the building that you cant seem to grasp this.
Pages: <<  82    83    84    85    86    87    88  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags