........continued
Lets start with an image that in NO way,shape or form, be admisable in a court of law as proof.I will quote CatHerder,,,,
Below, another photo of a tire with the same pattern as ones used on a 757, found in the Pentagon wreckage.
Your kidding right?Same pattern,,,,WHAT PATTERN
If anyone can see a pattern,then they are a true to life super hero with super hero vision.I will give you the 'tire',but no way can anyone say they
can see a pattern.
Now lets goto the engine proof:
I will quote what CatHerder put and will let it be known that he did get this info off the net.So he did not make this quote up,but will also let it
be known it is not the WHOLE interview.
CatHerder said
What is seen in this photo is most likely the APU (Aux Power Unit) used in a 757 that is equipped with Rolls-Royce RB211 engines. The APU
(Honeywell GTCP331-200) is located in the tail section of the aircraft (that's what the large vent that looks like a 3rd jet engine is) as edvidenced
on this technical rescue reference aid from Boeing. Boeing 757 reference website. These small turbine engines are quite common on modern turbine &
turbofan passenger aircraft, and are used to furnish ground auxillary power while the main engines are shut down during ground operations. An online
training aid lets you Play around with the controls on a 757/767 instrument pannel.
There have been some people who claim that a Global Hawk was what hit the Pentagon. Here is what John W. Brown, spokesman for Rolls Royce
(Indianapolis), had to say about the part in the photo above “It is not a part from any Rolls Royce engine that I’m familiar with, and certainly not
the AE 3007H made here in Indy.” (Of course it wouldn't be anything he's familiar with, it's a powerplant made by Honeywell.)
Things left out:
AFP contacted Honeywell’s Aerospace division in Phoenix, Ariz., and sent high-resolution photos for their examination. “There’s no way that’s an
APU wheel,” an expert at Honeywell told AFP. The expert, who cannot be named, added: “That turbine disc—there’s no way in the world that came out of
an APU.”
American Free Press contacted Pratt & Whitney and Rolls Royce, manufacturers of the 757’s turbofan jet engines to try and identify the piece.
“If the aircraft that struck the Pentagon was a Boeing 757-200 owned by American Airlines, then it would have to be a Rolls Royce engine,” Mark
Sullivan, spokesman for Pratt & Whitney, told AFP.
John W. Brown, spokesman for Rolls Royce (Indianapolis), had previously told AFP: “It is not a part from any Rolls Royce engine that I’m familiar
with, and certainly not the AE 3007H made here in Indy.” <---- but he is just the spokesperson and Honeywell makes the APU anyway.
If the government version that an American Airlines 757-200 hit the Pentagon is accurate, then the object in the photo would have to be from a Rolls
Royce RB211-535 turbofan engine.
When AFP told Brown that it must be a piece of a Rolls Royce engine, Brown balked and asked who at Pratt & Whitney had provided the information.
Asked again if the disc in the photo is a piece of a Rolls Royce RB211-535, or from the AE 3007 series, Brown said he could not answer.
Rolls Royce produces the RB211-535 engines for American Airlines 757-200 aircraft at a plant in Derby, England. Martin Johnson, head of communications
at Rolls Royce in Derby, said he had followed the story closely in American Free Press and had also been notified in advance by Rolls Royce offices in
Seattle and Indianapolis.
However, rather than address the question of the unidentified disc, Johnson launched a verbal attack on this reporter for questioning the government
version of events at the Pentagon on 9-11. “You are the only person in the world who does not believe that a 757 hit the Pentagon,” Johnson said. “The
idea that we can have a reasonable conversation is beyond your wildest dreams,” Johnson said and hung up the phone.
READ IT ALL HERE...
So here is this mystery fan part that does not belong to the main engine,so it is suggested to be the APU.But then the makers of the APU say no it is
not.
Nobody wants to claim thier part here or what?
Then the debate that it is the Global Hawk engine,but is said to be too small.
Lets look at the images again.
Debris at Pentagon and
Global Hawk engine which for the record is NOT a detailed view as said by
CatHerder.If you ask me,the Global Hawk fan looks bigger,not smaller.But perspective is hard to judge at times.So lets say they are close in
size.After all,we are missing some vital parts here including the casing.
Now how about that Global Hawk theory.
Here we have the first frame of the security cam with what seems to be some sort of craft.Please take a look at the
SOURCE
Lets compare again with engine/fan This image shows the debris and the manufacturing of a Global Hawk Allison Turbofan engine
SOURCE
Maybe we need more images to show engine of Global Hawk.
Lets talk about the PLANE - IMPACT HOLE LEFT - HIEGHTS
Now this image is what have been given from security.
This clearly shows an object be it a 757 or Global Hawk going straight and perpendicular to the ground.Why is it said that the plane was coming DOWN
towards the building and made impact?That is FALSE and this image is proof.
Now.Since we can clearly see this object flying perpendicular to the ground and not heading in a downward angle,how does a 757 do this?It has already
been stated that a 757 due to size and speed (at full throttle) can not do this that close to the ground.CatHerder already said due to the air
pressure.
To add to that,the hole left in the Pentagon was from the ground up at around 16ft.This would indicate something flying low to the ground which has
been stated,cant be done with a 757.
If the object had been going down at an angel towards to building,then as shown in the image at the distance it shows,the 757 would have hit the
ground first.
All you have to do is look at the object and building in the image and see the distance between them.
........TO BE CONTINUED
