Originally posted by johnlear
OK. Please know this. I have been a pilot for almost 50 years. No airman has more FAA certificates than I do. I had over 19,000 hours when I retired
in 2001, 16,000 in large jets. I have participated in many crash investigations.
I have built airplanes, I have flown them, I have instructed in them, I have raced them and I have crashed them. The hypothesis that the wings and
tail and fuel from a Boeing 757 disintegrated from the high kinectic energy of impact is pure, unadulterated, unmitigated B.S.
I do not profess to be a pilot, I do not profess to be certified by the FAA in any way shape or form. But, since you're a pilot, with a pile of FAA
certs, please explain to us what you think would have happened to the wings.
Anyone can pooh pooh about something somebody else posted, but it takes a real man to post something substiantial to counter it (as in some sort of
proof other than your statement about your expertise).
Surely you have seen the F4 tests when they flew two of them into concrete walls to test just how well a nuclear reactor shell would hold up against
such an "accident"? I've been looking for the video online, and finally found it on Sandia Labs website- I recall what was left, do you? Itty bitty
teenie weenie bits and peices of metal and little chunks of aluminum.
Video 1
Video 2
Video 3
Video 4
(click for larger images, click links for videos)

(Gosh darn it, that magic plane just up and disintegrated by running into a wall! What a load of unadulterated BS!!)
So, please if you'd be so kind. Tell me how in the heck THIS plane can disintegrate going 320MPH into a wall and the 757 couldn't also break up into
small chunks hitting the reinforced concrete/steel/kevlar wall of the Pentagon?
[edit on 13-9-2004 by CatHerder]