Originally posted by Reheat
reply to post by LaBTop
Hi, Labtop... Where have you been? Do you mind listing a source for the Lear Jet near AF 1 story? Why is it that you seem to be the only one who
has ever mentioned this encounter? I have never heard of that before....
Have you decided to abandon your other threads? Can't say that I can't blame you! 
Again, act as if it's the usual selective reading problem with all JREF-debunkers here.
(Oh dear, can't find a linky.)
However I don't think so, it's their latest technique to play dumb, to force you to do as much typing work as can be, to keep you off the real
research, which is still developing.
OMG, there are also numerous paper printed-only sources, you misinformed mis-argumentation-geniuses.
By the way, Reheat, I have completed a long rebuttal of your signature link, I'll post it shortly after, then add that post to my signature
(WISDOMwillWIN). So it will occur from then on also in my signature as a link, and thus also in this post.
And I answer posts in my own pace. And do research to counter your task-force its few-liner arguments with solid rebuttals, that make it clear to the
readers, that your task in this forum obviously is to post as many few-liners in as short a period as you all can manage in a 12 hours working day.
Without any proper argumentation, or backed by your own research.
I will answer all these posts that as usual have the bulk of disinformation in it, and drive that drivel into the ground, as usual.
Btw, it's showing lately a tad bit too clear, that none of you JREF-debunkers taskforce participants here, do ever address the real arguments in the
threads and posts, you try to derail. And flood with drivel with no substance AT ALL.
As is perfectly demonstrated again by your above posts. You all act as if you did not READ what I offered you on a plate :
Page 199,
this post :
This is not online, so I typed it out : F-16 Pilots Considered Ramming Flight 93 By William B. Scott /
Aviation Week & Space Technology September 9, 2002
Editor's Note: This is Part 3 of an ongoing special report on how the military responded to terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Earlier articles
appeared in the June 3 and June 10 issues.
Source :
Originally posted by LaBTop
In the afternoon, Sasseville and Lucky were flying their second mission of the day--armed with AIM-9 missiles now--when they were told to contact
an AWACS aircraft in the area and "expect special tasking." They were directed to fly a 280-deg. heading for 140 naut. mi.--almost due west of
Washington. Unable to communicate by secure or encrypted means, the AWACS controller lowered his voice and told Sasseville via radio they were going
to "escort Air Force One," President Bush's aircraft.
Two Langley F-15s offered to go along, and Sasseville concurred. Soon, an AWACS controller reported a fast-moving, unidentified aircraft southwest of
Air Force One, approximately 60 naut. mi. away, but on a "cutoff vector" to the President's Boeing 747. It was above 40,000 ft. and the 747 was
"in the 20,000-ft. range," but Sasseville sent the F-15s to intercept the unknown aircraft.
It was a Learjet that had not yet landed after aircraft nationwide had been ordered out of the air.
And a moderator should order you to stop spreading such obvious lies as you post multiple times lately. I DID NOT WRITE THAT LINE, NOR DID I INVENT A
LEARJET.
It's called SMEAR-TACTICS in my circles.
That red line is from that weekly issued Aviation Week & Space Technology publication, NOT from me!
You also did not read
this post about the myriad of identified helicopters and light aircraft who did not know yet what had happened in
the early morning. These intercepts were however a long time over already at the time of GWB return to Washington DC.
You, as identifying yourself as an experienced former jet fighter pilot, do know perfectly what is so strange in that remark. It was not identified
before it was in a 60 miles circle around Air Force One, by AWACS or FAA controllers at Reagan National, who were "BullsEye" for the Pentagon area
protection task.
Especially the remark that it had not yet landed after aircraft nationwide had been ordered out of the air. And that order was given around 09:30 in
the early morning.!
A Lear Jet can't fly around from before 09:30 a.m. up to 17:30 p.m. (8 hrs) without refueling in the air (since the article says: had not yet landed)
or carrying a huge extra tank on board. That was a hell of a strange encounter for Air Force One, and the AWACS operators knew it.
And they directly identified it as a thread to AF One.
You act dumb, or you are...whatever..?!
"The FAA controllers were doing their best to get us information [about unidentified aircraft], but we were used to working with AWACS and
their weapons directors and controllers," Rasmussen said. Eventually, Washington Reagan National Airport was designated "Bullseye," and fighters
were given range and bearing to targets from there. Possibly the highest ranking pilot in the area, Sasseville "essentially declared myself the CAP
[combat air patrol] commander and set up deconfliction altitudes so we didn't run into each other. There really wasn't time for niceties." For the
rest of the day, a dozen or so fighters rotated in and out of the region, running intercepts on myriad helicopters and light aircraft.
You probably also did not read anything else on page 199 of my extensive posts there, and missed this very interesting link :
www.oilempire.us...
It's quite a read, with
hundreds of questions about 9/11 which have never been answered by any US government to this date.
You probably also missed
this post about the then NEXCOM operated gas station
on a hill SOUTH of the Pentagon, with it's security camera that had an unhindered view on it's west wall, that contained
coverage of a 757 airliner slamming in the side of the Pentagon.
The gas station's crew who had first reviewed that footage, later handed the tape over to the FBI on their own initiative.
This is NOT the CITGO station, which
is located WEST of the Pentagon, and surely not on a hill. And where the FBI came within minutes to
confiscate their security camera tape.
That footage probably had a too sharp view at the attack path, and showed irrevocably that AA 77 came from a NoC flight path, and that's why this
footage was "disappeared".
Btw, strange ain't it? All my interesting links from those early years are for the most part defunct by now.
They certainly were not at the time of posting.
I again advice the readers, to re-read my page 199 and 200 posts.
There is a lot of extra good information in them.
Plane would only need to penetrate the outermost (E ring) and the debris after slidding through the building
to punch out the C ring wall
The Pentagon walls are made of brick with a facade of cut limestone on the outermost E Ring wall
So who is the IDIOT Now .....
