9/11: A Boeing 757 Struck the Pentagon, page 283
Pages: <<  280    281    282    283    284    285    286  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 70 times


reply posted on 29-1-2009 @ 01:56 AM by crydixxx
Originally posted by waynedg i have not gone through all the posts but something that stood out for me was the pictures that were posted. why is there a NO PARKING sign there on the one picture it seems out of place as it seems there a marked parking bays on another side of the Pentagon and as that is on the grassy side i dont think people would have parked there anyway. why are there no windows on the picture where it shows the small hole in the wall. i cannot figure where this picture was taken as the penatgon shows many windows at the crash site. 64 dead people from that plane surely not on such a size plane? [edit on 25-1-2009 by waynedg]
I was thinking the EXACT same thing about that picture with the no parking sign...It's a fake! I don't even think that is the pentagon in the picture. A jetliner slams into it and the no parking sign is still there not even charred? LOL I think this "account" of the incident is just another corrupt government hoax designed to pull the wool over our eyes some more! I witness the pentagon live on CNN "although CNN is government controlled" I watched mesmerized for 36 hours straight...there was no debris there..the lawn on the way in was unblemished where the plane would be gorging a trench in it. Hani Hanjour could barely fly a single engine cessna as stated by his american floridian flight instructor, yet was empowered with the ability to fly a complex pattern with a 757 to the pentagon. What about general george takeya's statement about Cheney being informed about the incoming plane every 10 miles on it's approach, and in the final 10 minutes before impact, the person informing cheney asked if the orders still stand? This is a lovely ruse here, but i don't buy a lot of your "research" So if you so desire, delete this post so you can keep pulling the wool over peoples eyes, but for people who do their own independent research, they will see through this crap!


reply posted on 29-1-2009 @ 02:24 AM by Pilgrum
reply to post by crydixxx
I think you missed the post by Seymour Butz. That 'No Parking' sign is next to the exit hole within the Pentagon and it's photographed in a narrow roadway between the rings (the A-E drive). The entry hole is much larger than that.



reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 09:41 PM by bud316
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS where are the wings and the tail ? where are the marks on the wall that wings where present ? where are marks on the wall that a tail section was present ? how could a plane leave a perfectly round circle with no evedence of wing impact or tail impact ? why did the plane make such an effort to hit the side of the building that was already under construction at the pentagon ? why the pentagon and not the capitol or white house ? how could this plane get this close to the capital with out our 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 defense program stopping it ?????? can you be more spcific on the location of the wheels and engins ? can you tell me how a plane with a 122ft wing span went inside a 16 ft hole and vanished if i mesured from the center of the plane to center of each engine it seams like that would be at least 20 to 30 feet on each side a total of 60 feet max please show me impact points on the wall where these two 20,000 lb engins hit the pentagon ?????? the planes had to be flying at a desent speed of about 150 miles per hr otherwise impact couldnt be as persise do you think every one in this country is an idiot ????????? i dont expect to see this on your web site because i dont think you can honnestly answer my questions I AM AN AMERICAN
Good God.. Is page 283 the only page you have read? We appreciate your support for our country, but dude, you need to spell check before you hit POST! Just kidding.. Everything your asking is in these pages alone. You have the same questions we have all had in the beginning. Take a few days, read the whole thread... very very interesting..


reply posted on 11-2-2009 @ 08:21 PM by CameronFox
reply to post by persianpride
Dude... you are a few years behind here. But you look like a newbie... go to Screw Loose Change and LOL Loose Change... total debunking of their garbage.


reply posted on 11-2-2009 @ 08:23 PM by knowpeace
whats bad about loose change?



reply posted on 11-2-2009 @ 09:31 PM by GoldenFleece
reply to post by CameronFox
I've actually met Dylan Avery. A very low-key and unassuming guy who planned to make a conventional documentary about 9/11. Dylan told me he's spent more money producing and revising the various editions of Loose Change than he's made from sales. But like most of us who've spent any time researching the subject, the more he investigated the official "19 boxcutter-wielding Arabs" conspiracy theory, the more he realized there were serious problems with the government's story. Anyway Cameron, your emotional knee-jerk response to the mere mention of Loose Change reminds me of the Wicked Witch of the West's reaction to Dorothy throwing water on her.


reply posted on 11-2-2009 @ 09:34 PM by CameronFox
reply to post by GoldenFleece
You met Do-Over Dylan? The man who admitted during a debate that mistakes were intentionally left in his movies? THEN... handed out 50 thousand DVD's the next day? Hey Golden... this is the Pentagon thread. I tell you what. Start a Loose Change thread.... what you think they got right....and I will join in there.
Pages: <<  280    281    282    283    284    285    286  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 8 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 19 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 93 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 69 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies