 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 07:32 AM by jthomas
|
See www.abovetopsecret.com...
If you continue trolling you'll get reported as such.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 07:45 AM by The Bear Man
|
Dont know if this will help
www.youtube.com...
Im not making my opinion, just somehing to study. The enhanced link they give didnt work sorry T.T
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 07:51 AM by The Bear Man
|
www.youtube.com...
Heres CGI and stuff, hope this helps a little as well, I am still keeping my opinion to myself for the time being
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 01:25 PM by shug7272
|
Starred and Flagged OP. Very nice work. I have believed for a good while that there was something up with 911 but your post makes alot of sense. I
have always tried to have an open mind and not just settle on one belief or the other. Building 7 still confuses me... Nice post none the less.
BTW I know Im late to the party but this is the first time I have seen this post.
[edit on 13-5-2008 by shug7272]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 01:54 PM by ULTIMA1
|
 Originally posted by jthomas
Obviously, it's easy when you are close. I see pilots of the Blue Angels in their F-18s all the time at air shows as they fly by low at high speed.
Well for 1 i have probably been to more airshows then you ever will.
Second, trying to compare seeing a pilot in a F-18 and seeing passengers in a airliners shows how little you know about planes.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 01:56 PM by ULTIMA1
|
Originally posted by jthomas
If you continue trolling you'll get reported as such.
I will repeat for the closed minded.
The FBI or NTSB has not released any photos or videos of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.
The FBI or NTSB has not released any reports matching the parts found to any of the the 9/11 planes.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 03:37 PM by ANOK
|
I know what the vid was trying to show and I addressed that. Maybe you should read better?
And no there is only lack of evidence...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 03:44 PM by ANOK
|
reply to post by jthomas
First off there seems to be a lot of folks in this thread with reading comprehension problems. Maybe you should try again and get back to us because
I'm tired of having to repeat myself to get you to understand what I'm saying.
No video is needed, yet there should be a few of them that the pentagoon refuses to release.
No I don't need a 'video', I need evidence of an AA757.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 04:32 PM by darkbluesky
|
Ultima,
Don't you suppose that if the FBI felt there was enough public doubt surrounding the events of 9/11 they would release such reports, even if they
needed to fabricate them?
I mean...after all, they were obviously capable of fabricating the story of a 757 striking the Pentagoon (that one's for Anok), along with all the
special effects. So what's the big deal about making up a silly little report with some pictures of airplane parts w/ SN's and all?
Doesn't add up. 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 05:01 PM by ThroatYogurt
|
reply to post by darkbluesky
The FBI and the Federal Government do not care what VERY few people accuse them of.
They have bigger fish to fry.
:TY:
[edit on 13-5-2008 by ThroatYogurt]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 06:48 PM by ANOK
|
reply to post by darkbluesky
Why should they? It seems they have fooled enough people without having to do anything more.
But regardless it doesn't change the facts, building don't globally fail from asymmetrical damage and office fires. Show me one that has...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 07:22 PM by darkbluesky
|
reply to post by ANOK
To satisfy the demands of certain individuals that doubt the "official story".
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 08:29 PM by jthomas
|
LOL.
Neither of which has anything to do with ALL the evidence you can't refute that AA77 hit the Pentagon. You're going nowhere with your irrationality,
Ultima1, but we'll give you an opportunity to go live with it:
 Press Release - For Immediate Release
Air America Radio: What Happened At The Pentagon?
05/13/08 - We hope you'll join us regarding the issues surrounding the Pentagon Attack this Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 9pm Eastern on Air America
Radio with your host Richard Greene, Co-Produced by Rob Balsamo, Co-Founder, Pilots For 9/11 Truth. The show will be streaming on the internet at
airamerica.com...
Guest will be:
Craig Ranke from Citizen Investigation Team thepentacon.com...
Rob Balsamo, Co-Founder, Pilots For 9/11 Truth pilotsfor911truth.org...
Kevin Barret www.mujca.com...
Individuals supporting the govt story - TBA
We have contacted others to represent the government story including James Meigs and David Coburn of Popular Mechnics. Their Secretary has advised us
that Meigs and Coburn are no longer accepting any offers to discuss topics on 9/11 Others are in the process of gathering possible representatives.
Please email us at pilots@pilotsfor911truth.org if you would be interested in representing the goverment position regarding the events at the
Pentagon.
Topics of Dicussion will include (but not limited to) -
Hani Hanjour
Flight Data Recorder
Witnesses - published and non-published
Other issues surrounding the Pentagon
We hope to see you there!
Rob Balsamo
Co-Founder
pilotsfor911truth.org
forums.randi.org...
Many of us will get a good laugh at 9/11 Truthers's expense.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 08:34 PM by jthomas
|
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by jthomas
First off there seems to be a lot of folks in this thread with reading comprehension problems.
Indeed. I am encouraging you to understand the written word.
Maybe you should try again and get back to us because I'm tired of having to repeat myself to get you to understand what I'm saying.
I did. The first time.
No video is needed, yet there should be a few of them that the pentagoon refuses to release.
And any videos, whether they exist or not, is irrelevant. You understand that now?
No I don't need a 'video', I need evidence of an AA757.
The evidence exists and is available to you, without a video. It is documented, overwhelming, and unrefuted. Why do you ignore it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 08:36 PM by jthomas
|
No, but that's what trolls do.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 09:17 PM by darkbluesky
|
Just curious, can you produce one NTSB, or FAA report that provides evicence, in the form of credited and indexed photos linking SN's etc. to the
alleged crashed airplane?
I won't even ask about FBI reports since the FBI only investigates crimes.
You might reference TWA 800 however all I've ever seen is pictures of what appears to be thousands of parts of a TWA 747 re-assembled in a hangar. No
serial numbers, no photo credits...how the hell do I know if that was TWA 800 or not?
Here's how I know, TWA 800 went missing, radar showed where it crashed, divers went down and brought up pieces including the DFDR. We saw pictures of
airplane pieces. We were told what information the DFDR contained.
I suppose you think TWA 800 was also a government conspiracy?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 01:31 AM by ULTIMA1
|
Originally posted by darkbluesky
To satisfy the demands of certain individuals that doubt the "official story".
NO something you don't seem to want to know, its called the TRUTH.
Some of us want to know the truth of what really happened that day not the BS that the media is trying to seel us.
If you want to know about flight 800 i suggest you do some research, i am not going to do it for you.
[edit on 14-5-2008 by ULTIMA1]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 01:34 AM by ULTIMA1
|
Originally posted by darkbluesky
I won't even ask about FBI reports since the FBI only investigates crimes.
Are you trying to say that the 9/11 crash sites are not crime scenes?
Do you know that by law if a aircraft crash is considered a crime the FBI becomes the main invetagating agency with the NTSB for technical help?
[edit on 14-5-2008 by ULTIMA1]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 06:28 AM by darkbluesky
|
No, I am not. Is your reading compehension really that poor?
Do you know that by law if a aircraft crash is considered a crime the FBI becomes the main invetagating agency with the NTSB for technical
help?
Yes, I do. My earlier statement conveyed the idea that you won't find FBI reports for MOST aviation inciidents beacuse most are not considered
crimes.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 06:44 AM by jthomas
|
Too bad all you have presented are strawman arguments and have been unable to refute the evidence.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
