9/11: A Boeing 757 Struck the Pentagon, page 19
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 70 times


reply posted on 1-10-2004 @ 12:31 AM by SomewhereinBetween
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween If anyone got my point at all, it was not about the light blue/grey since I went to the trouble of using "/" as the accepted indicator of either colour, such that one might use; him/her, to someone when gender is unknown. The issue I have on the colour I thought self-evident especially given the way I charted the colours of the 3 crafts. so I provide same again, and this time highlight what to me is the obvious dissimilarity.: AA 757- ………………..AA767………………….Video………………Debris ………………………….blue/grey……………………...................... Dark blue; ……...dark blue……………..dark blue……..light blue/grey white; ……………...white……………..……red…………......white red;……………….…red………....……………white……...……red grayish…………...grey………………..…..greyish……..….blue/grey
Sorry, I have been off the web a bit lately, and just got your post. I did not realize that your discrepancy with the paint was about the striping on the wreckage. I already posted that the scheme was:
Originally posted by Defcon5 757’s and 767’s Bare Stainless Steel Dark Blue Stripe White Stripe Dark Red Stripe Bare Stainless Steel Non-Metal parts Are Grey Tail is Grey Tail has one Red A and one Blue A with a Blue Eagle The word American is Red surrounded with White
It seemed so apparent to me that this piece of wreckage was part of the lettering that is Red Outlined in White, that it just flew right by me. Catherder put a nail in that coffin already, better then I could have. As far as the video goes, you cannot even see the stripes or lettering on that grainy, lo-res, piece of film.
No need to apologize. Now rather than concentrate on that piece of debris which I calim to not know how it fits, I refer both you and Catherder to the crux of my issue on the colouring scheme which by the way is not regarding the debris. My posts on this are clear particularly since I provided the AA colour scheme compared to the colour scheme of the craft in the clip. So I would appreciate that no attempt is made to divert from the fiacl point I present. I repeat; the focus of the colour scheme is between the AA scheme and the craft on the clip. That among other details I raise are conveniently ignored in deference to arguing innocuous and highly assumptive continuously morphing points.


reply posted on 1-10-2004 @ 11:34 PM by defcon5
are you reffuring to this picture? That is not an official AA paint scheme. It looks like someone just found a picture of any 757 that was about the right size to fit the video to show for comparison sake. If it is an AA plane then this is a special paintjob for some kind of promotional thing. In addition, I have seen a few planes in fleets that have special paint jobs because the employees bought it for the company, or that have advertising on them, and such. That is not the paint scheme on the plane that hit the building though. If I am still not understanding what you are saying, please clarify it for me. IF you need me to find out what that specific paint scheme is, I will try to find out for you.


reply posted on 2-10-2004 @ 01:37 AM by defcon5
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween 767 Instead of a dark blue upper area there is a lighter blue/grey followed by a dark blue stripe, then white then red, then a greyish underbelly. American is displayed as it is with the 757.
Just a note, but the lighter blue/gray area, is the area I was referring to where the buffer had been run down the side of the plane in this picture. That you stated that you could not see:
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween I see no such line.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween No! I am referring to the original CNN photo as I have provided, not that poor copy of same and especially not one whereby some artistic licence is used to placement an aircraft out of sync.
I guess that this is the photo that you are talking about, then:
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween The following are the 5 uncropped frames as produced by CNN and before anyone started fiddling with them. The picture in question is 569x347 and as you can see is quite clearer than the sample CH provided. 911research.wtc7.net... [img] www.911research.com...[/img] Now if I enlarge this AA picture in photoshop I can see a good outline of the craft. It appears dark blue, red stripe then white stripe then a lighter blue underbelly.Review the stripes then;
Unfortunately, I do not have Photoshop, if you can zoom in and crop the picture, then it might be clearer as to what exactly you are seeing. I just cannot make out much in this picture, even zooming in with paintbrush.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween I have provided the AA paint scheme, more than once. It is what it is, a defined corporate policy. I would expect that a corporation as large as American Airlines will not veer from corporate logo for any reason
Actually some airlines do very the paint scheme on certain planes, like I mentioned above, if it was donated, or bought for a special purpose, or any of 100 other reasons. Usually these paint schemes are very different from the standard though.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween I cannot make the above any clearer, and it appears to me that those arguing with me purposely either ignore this for obvious reasons or beat around the bush to detract from addressing what we know and can see in favour of what they wish to see.
I do not believe that anyone is purposely trying to ignore anything; you can always reattach the photo to clarify things. I have no problem with reviewing what you are stating, but really did not understand what in your original post you saw as a discrepancy. I still cannot make out much in this picture, I will try and check closer, but if you can crop and zoom in on the area you think the paint is out of whack, it would be clearer to the rest of us.


reply posted on 2-10-2004 @ 01:16 PM by SomewhereinBetween
Defcon, this is the photo yes. I am sure others in here have photoshop and therefore have the ability to either enlarge or display this image as full view on their monitors. I do not know how to edit images and then post them here, but take a good look again: [img] www.911research.com...[/img] Find the craft by locating the tail wich is directly above the obstacle to the right. Then trace it to the left and you clearly see the craft with a red stripe and a much lighter underbelly than the top. 1) Note the fin shape. 2) Try and discern the stripe colours and their order 3) Try and locate the logo 4) Note the building visible beyond the front of the craft. 5) Also note that no part of the craft extends to the right of the obstacle. 6) Note this photo is not nearly as distorted as the one CatHerder uses for his graphics. Now if you can find some way to enlarge you would be able to discern the colouration better, perhaps CatHerder himself can do that and post it back. If he obliges then I suggest he lift a copy directly from the CNN site under EXTRA INFORMATION: www.cnn.com...


reply posted on 2-10-2004 @ 05:47 PM by CatHerder
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween Defcon, this is the photo yes. I am sure others in here have photoshop and therefore have the ability to either enlarge or display this image as full view on their monitors. I do not know how to edit images and then post them here, but take a good look again: [img] www.911research.com...[/img] Find the craft by locating the tail wich is directly above the obstacle to the right. Then trace it to the left and you clearly see the craft with a red stripe and a much lighter underbelly than the top. 1) Note the fin shape. 2) Try and discern the stripe colours and their order 3) Try and locate the logo 4) Note the building visible beyond the front of the craft. 5) Also note that no part of the craft extends to the right of the obstacle. 6) Note this photo is not nearly as distorted as the one CatHerder uses for his graphics. Now if you can find some way to enlarge you would be able to discern the colouration better, perhaps CatHerder himself can do that and post it back. If he obliges then I suggest he lift a copy directly from the CNN site under EXTRA INFORMATION: www.cnn.com...
THAT IS ONE OF MY GRAPHICS. You are using ONE OF THE GRAPHICS I POSTED HERE. I then zoomed in on that graphic - I am sorry you are unable to grasp that, but I've come to the conclusion that I've been responding to a brick wall to begin with. This is an utter waste of time. You don't read anything, you made up your mind on some delusional conspiracy theory before posting here, and there is nothing I can do to alleviate your desire to live in a world of makebelieve. You are right. A space ship hit the Pentagon. No 757 was involved. My last post in this thread to you. [edit on 4-10-2004 by CatHerder]


reply posted on 2-10-2004 @ 09:32 PM by defcon5
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween but take a good look again: [img] www.911research.com...[/img] Find the craft by locating the tail wich is directly above the obstacle to the right. Then trace it to the left and you clearly see the craft with a red stripe and a much lighter underbelly than the top. 1) Note the fin shape. 2) Try and discern the stripe colours and their order 3) Try and locate the logo 4) Note the building visible beyond the front of the craft. 5) Also note that no part of the craft extends to the right of the obstacle. 6) Note this photo is not nearly as distorted as the one CatHerder uses for his graphics.
I see what you are talking about where it appears that there are stripes forward of the aircraft tail. What worries me though, is if you notice the curb on the other side of the street from the security gate, it also appears to have stripes, so does the side walk that is beyond that. I am not a Photo analyst, and to me what you are calling strips, looks like it might just be another section of pavement even farther off in the distance, that has been similarly pixilated. Since I do not have the equipment to check on this, I will leave that up to someone else that does. [edit on 10/2/2004 by defcon5]
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags