9/11: A Boeing 757 Struck the Pentagon, page 147

Originally posted by billybob
Originally posted by vandalizor I think what many conspiracy people fail to realize or understand is one simple truth.
there is no simple truth. this is what no-conspiracy people 'fail' to realise. (i put that in brackets because i think half of the people who even discuss this topic are 'in on it' ala cointelpro/majestic mind control) katrina was a manufactured storm, and a trial run for bigger disasters yet to come. sherman skolnick has sent supreme court judges to JAIL. he is no lightweight, and NOT a 'theorist'. he is a voracious researcher who has been watching and attacking(and wounding) the beast of the illuminati cabal(although HE doesn't call it that) for DECADES. if you can read that marc rich story, and merely hand waive it off as fiction, then you have no business making popish remarks about what can and cannot be true in the 'real world'. because this is a 'big thread', and i must 'stay on topic': the 'new' pentagon footage shows nothing new, and has been edited, and there is no reason that it could not have been shown in september of 2001. the 'it's evidence in a trial' excuse is just about as lame as they come. the fact is, is that the government is HIDING ALL THE RELEVENT EVIDENCE of 911. that ALONE 'indicates' complicity.

I disagree, I happen to subscribe to Occams Razor, so when I am presented with 2 or more competing theories, I tend to choose the less complex one with the least amount of assumptions. Mr. Skolnick's testimony has resulted in 40 lawyers, 20 local judges, and exactly 1 federal appeals court judge jailed for bribary and misconduct. All in the state of Illinois. His research and testimony has never resulted in a Supreme Court Judge ever being tried, let alone jailed. Please don't exagerate other peoples credentials, I will check. I think him and his alledged "meteorolgist" people are completely out of their tree with the hurricane theory, but it is entertaining. Conspiracy theorists can't be choosers I guess. I did not dismiss the article as "fiction", it may infact be partly, if not wholely true. When people start making assumptions without proof, that's where they lose me. When they make statements like "an apperatis for laundering CIA Drug money" like it's a known fact, when they have no proof, I start to question the authenticity of the whole argument. If you are going to make a statement like that, you should have to back it up. Maybe it's a known fact to the people in the "know" but that doesn't cut it in court. They hit you with statements like "our undisputed appeals record" and they quote official court documents, but the quotes amount to nothing more than who the case is between or what it is about. This is only proof that they filed a case, nothing more. Prison inmates file cases in court everyday, what's that prove? How about as proof, you show us the ruling on the case? I never said our government was full of boy scouts. There are crooks there, yes. They tend to execute self preservation and self wealth accumulation more than executing the will of the people. If this thread was corruption in government, I would be there right beside you screaming for justice. Our government is too inept to execute a clandestine operation of this scale and magnitude and ensuing cover up. Our politicians biggest skill is self preservation, that alone would preclude them from signing on to something like this. This thread is about whether or not a plane hit the pentagon and to a lesser extent, the events of 9/11. Of that I am convinced that one did, and our government had nothing to due with it, other than failing to protect some 3000 Americans. If there is a coverup, my guess is they are trying to hide the extent of their failure to protect Americans, that would be more plausable, but still without proof... [edit on 22-5-2006 by vandalizor] [edit on 22-5-2006 by vandalizor]