9/11: A Boeing 757 Struck the Pentagon, page 142

the extensive use of physics, chemistry and engineering calculations seems not to convince the majority of official 9/11 explanation followers, that there is something ridiculously wrong with those official explanations. So, let's start to find the obvious signs of the times, without all the overly scientific complications and infinitely repeated data throwing. Pentagon Building Performance Report. fire.nist.gov... and click the pdf link : fire.nist.gov... Then proceed to page 16 of 45, and there you'll find the fatalities diagrams for the first and second stories. (Btw, in Europe, they would call that the ground and first floors). Anyone with a good eyesight will observe at first glance 2 things: 1. A circa 90° impact path for building occupants fatalities to the right of the impact hole on the West wall of the Pentagon. 2. A circa 45° to 55° spread impact path for building occupants fatalities to the far left of the impact hole. After scrutinage of the 2 diagrams, you could even devide that nr. 2 observation into : 2. A 45° impact path, and 3. A 52° to 55° impact path. Now, did you observe the remark from Fire at NIST on page 16 that : ""Impact of the fuselage was at column line 14, at or slightly below the secondfloor slab."" They want you to follow their impact angle of about 52°. However, the fatality debris path originating from that collumn line 14, is clearly under a 90° angle. And, moreover, in fact, it is obvious that the 90° angle fatalities impact path originates from collumn line 11. The very one which was the 20 minutes later than impact, implosion collapse front. At that expansion joints collumn line 11, the building collapsed. That expansion joint line had double collumns from the front to the back of all 3 rings E,D and C. But this report shows these doble collumns only clearly at the very left side of this diagram. And the 3D forms of these 2 diagrams are also clearly chosen to obfuscate the obvious 2 to 3 different debris flight pathes through the 3 rings. If a straight-on visualization was chosen, it would have been immediately obvious, that a few strange debris flight pathes would have been observable in such a 90° head-on visualization. Another strange fact: the scattered findings of the aircraft passengers fatalities. Those green and white blocks. The white ones are the front rows passengers. Remember : ""Impact of the fuselage was at column line 14, at or slightly below the secondfloor slab."" Well, that's strange. NOT A SINGLE passenger fatality found on the second story (EU : first floor). While we find the most remains of passengers in the last, C-ring's first story (EU : ground floor!) I'll make it clear for those who still don't understand the meaning of that remark : The passengers in any airplane are sitting on top of one of the strongest parts of an airplane: the floorbeams from nose to tail section. In fact the area they are seated in, is not much more than a flimsy aluminum can, compared to the luggage area. All the strength is situated around the luggage area with a few strong beams on top of that area, functioning also as the passenger cabine floor struts. And then you can observe another strange fact in one of my last pictures from my last post on page 141. You really need to open the hires picture, to be able to see clear that a substantial part of the floor slab's concrete is missing in that early Cpl. Ingersoll pre-collapse picture with the red hot burning entry hole clearly visible, and you can look inside of the entry hole. The thick concrete second floor slab has been evaporated for quite a substantial part of the E-ring's second floor area. So if that was a 757, most of the impact force must have been consumed by the impact of the planes floorbeams on the second floor slab. How the hell did it turn all passenger remains up at the ground floor level? They would have to end up, logically, at the first floor level, and logically somewhere in the first ring impacted, the E-ring. No, they find most of their remains at the back of the C-ring, on the GROUND floor. Which must lead us to conclude that bodies or body parts have more mass and more penetrating power than steel, titanium and highstrength aluminium plane parts. Sorry, pass that lie on to all those first and even second term Bush voters, they tend to believe anything when it is printed on government approved paper.

Pentagon struck by explosives laden row boat??!!